Sidney Powell Presentation Today.

[bodecea]

Are the media articles also meaningless unless they are presented in a court of law?

There is no obligation for Wood or Powell to be honest with the media.

On the other than, they have repercussions for lying to the court.

There is no obligation for CNN to be honest with you.

Yet you slurp it up like a dog.

We are thankfully smarter and can asses the credibility of the evidence ourselves, without a judge deciding for us.

Obviously you can't and without at least winning some of these court cases your personal opinion doesn't mean shit to overturn an election.

Cool story.

It will be interesting to see what she has.

Indeed....send money.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

I think she's a bit of a flake, but she used to be a federal prosecutor, so she might have some compelling evidence. I'll see if OAN is covering it.

I was watching Hannity yesterday, and he had two of the witnesses on the show that testified in front of the Michigan panel. One was a truck driver who said he hauled 22 pallets of ballots from NY to Michigan. The other was a kid that works at the post office where he said he was instructed to back date thousands of ballots so they could be counted in the election. Both signed affidavits under oath and penalty of perjury.

Both said they really had no party, and it seemed little interest in politics. They didn't know what was in the ballot envelops and of course, couldn't open them up. As a truck driver, I know for a fact that log books, shipping documents, receiving documents are all kept on file. The person receiving the freight has to sign for it.

 

[HappyJoy]

Are the media articles also meaningless unless they are presented in a court of law?

There is no obligation for Wood or Powell to be honest with the media.

On the other than, they have repercussions for lying to the court.

There is no obligation for CNN to be honest with you.

Yet you slurp it up like a dog.

We are thankfully smarter and can asses the credibility of the evidence ourselves, without a judge deciding for us.

Obviously you can't and without at least winning some of these court cases your personal opinion doesn't mean shit to overturn an election.

Cool story.

It will be interesting to see what she has.

Indeed....send money.

Send all the money, STAT.

 

[Obejoekenobe]

We are thankfully smarter.....

Well.... y'all are at least as smart as what the rightwing media echo chamber wants you to be.

LOL

 

[Obejoekenobe]

I'll see if OAN is covering it.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

Unless she is presenting it in a court of law, it is meaningless.

No, I will not watch the video. Provide a summary as the rules state.

Are the media articles also meaningless unless they are presented in a court of law?

Kind of, if they claim they have overwhelming evidence and then can't prove it in court or really even try.

What is this new bullshit standard? Stop spreading the CNN nonsense, UNLESS you first show that there is evidence for it by presenting it front of a judge.

Taking your facts to court and winning your argument is not a new standard, especially when it comes to our elections.

Sorta like Adam Shitface, and Russian Collusion?

The Democrats tried to present evidence at Trump's trial but the Republicans wouldn't let them. Why is it Republicans don't like evidence? Now or back then.

But, you're defending a guy who lost the popular vote twice, was impeached and couldn't win his reelection. All of those things have never happened to a single president before.

Uhm, in the Russian Collusion, Adam Shitface lair extraordinaire kept saying he had evidence that Russia had colluded but when asked to present it, the shitface never presented any. Also that fucker spent millions of dollars on investigations again finding out it was Hislery Campaign that paid for it..

Present it where? He tried to present evidence where it rightfully should be, at trial and the Republicans voted down evidence and witnesses. Why?

But fuck you demoncrap slaves anyway, you allow your crooked political masters to lie to you all the time, and when they are caught in that lie, you actually believe them , not the evidence presented in your face...Slaves of the progs, will be slaves of the progs...

I see, so your excuse about buying into Trump's lies is to claim that other people do it to? Good argument, I'm sure it will go far in overturning the election.

Not for the Russian Collusion you fucking retard, there wasnt any evidence, other than some bogus Fake Dossier that the Clinton Campaign concocted...fuck it must really suck to be as stupid as you, slave..

 

[Norman]

What is this new bullshit standard? Stop spreading the CNN nonsense, UNLESS you first show that there is evidence for it by presenting it front of a judge.

Anyway, she is presenting the same stuff in court, that makes the trolling and whining particularly stupid.

Actually we've seen too often where the case they present on the courthouse steps is completely different than what they present to the judge.
Rudy Giuliani famously said his case would show massive election fraud, yet when in front of the judge he famously told him, "This is NOT a fraud case!"

That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.

The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.

However, there is plenty of fraud in Powell's case, I have made a threat going through it here before.

 

[Faun]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

Excellent, I can't wait! I want to see her fumble again by erroneously conflating Dominion with Smartmatic.

 

[Norman]

Speaking of Rudy, he is also presenting today, at 6 Eastern.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

Do you people ever get tired of looking dumb?

 

[Obejoekenobe]

OAN

OMG

LOLOL

 

[Norman]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

Excellent, I can't wait! I want to see her fumble again by erroneously conflating Dominion with Smartmatic.

Good to see you will be watching. Then there is no need to scream "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE", any longer.

 

[The Original Tree]

The reasons these hearings and presentations are being done like this are so they can record testimonies and have evidence.

Consider this just practice for the real thing. I worked for a law firm and they used to do things like this all the time, and then go back and do mock trials in the law firm to pick apart the presentations or evidence so that when the actual case came before a judge they have tweaked their case and mitigated all the weak points out of it.

The elections in these states that shut down the counting and did massive ballot dumps, and vote swapping and other kinds of fraud are invalid elections, so all 5-6 state elections will eventually end up in front of SCOTUS before Jan 20.

If the states refuse to mitigate the fraud, it has to go to SCOTUS.
Better that the states recognize the fraud, eliminate it and handle the electoral process in a fair way, than go to SCOTUS and let them sort it out.

Joe Biden will not be sworn in as President because you cannot certify elections that have this degree of fraud.

 

[Obejoekenobe]

Speaking of Rudy, he is also presenting today, at 6 Eastern.

Going to show his ass again?

 

[Faun]

Excellent, what state and jurisdiction did she file the lawsuit in? What judge will be hearing the case?
Nobody??? Then it's just keeping this bullshit in the news trying to get closer to December 14.
If this ambulance chaser had evidence whatsoever, it would have been presented weeks ago..in front of a judge...so it could be ruled upon.
But the minute that happens, the game is over and Sidney could be in some hot water.

Sidney and the rest of the D-Team are getting close to making a good case for charges of sedition brought against them.
Something I'm starting to hope a new DOJ will pursue.

Wut?? She's NOT presenting her case in court?

Damn!

That's what I wanted to see.

 

[Norman]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

Do you people ever get tired of looking dumb?

Do you get tired of violating the forum rules as a USMB mod? This is now the second time in a very short time span, I will quite possibly be moving this forward.

There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election. It's the most fraudulent election in history, done through means we would never accept as legitimate anywhere else.

 

[The Original Tree]

OAN

OMG

LOLOL

God laughs at the wicked who make a mockery of justice and defraud the poor and the widow of their voice. He laughs at you because He knows your end, and knows the end of your schemes.

 

[Rogue AI]

Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.

I think she's a bit of a flake, but she used to be a federal prosecutor, so she might have some compelling evidence. I'll see if OAN is covering it.

I was watching Hannity yesterday, and he had two of the witnesses on the show that testified in front of the Michigan panel. One was a truck driver who said he hauled 22 pallets of ballots from NY to Michigan. The other was a kid that works at the post office where he said he was instructed to back date thousands of ballots so they could be counted in the election. Both signed affidavits under oath and penalty of perjury.

Both said they really had no party, and it seemed little interest in politics. They didn't know what was in the ballot envelops and of course, couldn't open them up. As a truck driver, I know for a fact that log books, shipping documents, receiving documents are all kept on file. The person receiving the freight has to sign for it.

Exactly, there had to be a paper trail. Should be easy to prove or disprove.

Same with back dating at the post office. A simple audit will tell if mail was or wasn't processed at the times indicated. Seems like a big risk for little reward.

 

[Toro]

God laughs at the wicked who make a mockery of justice and defraud the poor and the widow of their voice. He laughs at you because He knows your end, and knows the end of your schemes.

God doesn't pick loons who think there's a global conspiracy to wipe out 6 billion people on earth to speak for Him.

 

[Obejoekenobe]

You Trumpies are some seriously damaged folk.

Seriously.... damaged folk.