Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They don't care. I see a trend at USMB where discussion of voter fraud gets moved to other forums but if you attack President Trump no matter how ridiculous the accusation, it stays front and center. I have tried to do something about it, but I am only one person.Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.
Do you people ever get tired of looking dumb?
Do you get tired of violating the forum rules as a USMB mod? This is now the second time, I will quite possibly be moving this forward.
There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election. It's the most fraudulent election in history, done through means that we would never accept anywhere else as legitimate.
"Michigan panel"? Not in court, under oath?Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.
I think she's a bit of a flake, but she used to be a federal prosecutor, so she might have some compelling evidence. I'll see if OAN is covering it.
I was watching Hannity yesterday, and he had two of the witnesses on the show that testified in front of the Michigan panel. One was a truck driver who said he hauled 22 pallets of ballots from NY to Michigan. The other was a kid that works at the post office where he said he was instructed to back date thousands of ballots so they could be counted in the election. Both signed affidavits under oath and penalty of perjury.
Both said they really had no party, and it seemed little interest in politics. They didn't know what was in the ballot envelops and of course, couldn't open them up. As a truck driver, I know for a fact that log books, shipping documents, receiving documents are all kept on file. The person receiving the freight has to sign for it.
In what court?Speaking of Rudy, he is also presenting today, at 6 Eastern.
They don't care. I see a trend at USMB where discussion of voter fraud gets moved to other forums but if you attack President Trump no matter how ridiculous the accusation, it stays front and center. I have tried to do something about it, but I am only one person.Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.
Do you people ever get tired of looking dumb?
Do you get tired of violating the forum rules as a USMB mod? This is now the second time, I will quite possibly be moving this forward.
There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election. It's the most fraudulent election in history, done through means that we would never accept anywhere else as legitimate.
There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election.
I was watching Hannity yesterday, and he had two of the witnesses on the show that testified in front of the Michigan panel. One was a truck driver who said he hauled 22 pallets of ballots from NY to Michigan.
There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election.
There is when none exist or been proven. Might as well be chasing unicorns.
When The Great Reset comes and you have no privacy, and no private property and you are standing in line to punch your ticket to Hell by accepting your Covi Pass 666 Quantum Dot Matrix Tattoo aka Mark of The Beast, you will say to yourself, "yah this is just a fairy tale, those guys were a bunch of loons" and then you will find yourself going through The Tribulation caught between The Wrath of God, and The Tyranny of Satan and his puppet AntiChrist, and then Judgment and Hell.God laughs at the wicked who make a mockery of justice and defraud the poor and the widow of their voice. He laughs at you because He knows your end, and knows the end of your schemes.
God doesn't pick loons who think there's a global conspiracy to wipe out 6 billion people on earth to speak for Him.
You have it backwards. You report your whole case to the court, and give the public just the highlights. Not the other way around.That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.
The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.
God laughs at the wicked who make a mockery of justice and defraud the poor and the widow of their voice. He laughs at you because He knows your end, and knows the end of your schemes.
Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.
Unless she is presenting it in a court of law, it is meaningless.
No, I will not watch the video. Provide a summary as the rules state.
Are the media articles also meaningless unless they are presented in a court of law?
Kind of, if they claim they have overwhelming evidence and then can't prove it in court or really even try.
What is this new bullshit standard? Stop spreading the CNN nonsense, UNLESS you first show that there is evidence for it by presenting it front of a judge.
Taking your facts to court and winning your argument is not a new standard, especially when it comes to our elections.
Sorta like Adam Shitface, and Russian Collusion?
The Democrats tried to present evidence at Trump's trial but the Republicans wouldn't let them. Why is it Republicans don't like evidence? Now or back then.
But, you're defending a guy who lost the popular vote twice, was impeached and couldn't win his reelection. All of those things have never happened to a single president before.
Uhm, in the Russian Collusion, Adam Shitface lair extraordinaire kept saying he had evidence that Russia had colluded but when asked to present it, the shitface never presented any. Also that fucker spent millions of dollars on investigations again finding out it was Hislery Campaign that paid for it..
Present it where? He tried to present evidence where it rightfully should be, at trial and the Republicans voted down evidence and witnesses. Why?
But fuck you demoncrap slaves anyway, you allow your crooked political masters to lie to you all the time, and when they are caught in that lie, you actually believe them , not the evidence presented in your face...Slaves of the progs, will be slaves of the progs...
I see, so your excuse about buying into Trump's lies is to claim that other people do it to? Good argument, I'm sure it will go far in overturning the election.
Not for the Russian Collusion you fucking retard, there wasnt any evidence, other than some bogus Fake Dossier that the Clinton Campaign concocted...fuck it must really suck to be as stupid as you, slave..
You have it backwards. You report your whole case to the court, and give the public just the highlights. Not the other way around.That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.
The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.
There is nothing dumb about going after fraud and contesting the election.
There is when none exist or been proven. Might as well be chasing unicorns.
Nothing proven?
Like the lady who never voted but voted anyway?
Plenty has been proven with painstaking detail.
Sidney Powell will be presenting evidence on election fraud today. Starts in a few hours.
Unless she is presenting it in a court of law, it is meaningless.
No, I will not watch the video. Provide a summary as the rules state.
Are the media articles also meaningless unless they are presented in a court of law?
Kind of, if they claim they have overwhelming evidence and then can't prove it in court or really even try.
What is this new bullshit standard? Stop spreading the CNN nonsense, UNLESS you first show that there is evidence for it by presenting it front of a judge.
Taking your facts to court and winning your argument is not a new standard, especially when it comes to our elections.
Sorta like Adam Shitface, and Russian Collusion?
The Democrats tried to present evidence at Trump's trial but the Republicans wouldn't let them. Why is it Republicans don't like evidence? Now or back then.
But, you're defending a guy who lost the popular vote twice, was impeached and couldn't win his reelection. All of those things have never happened to a single president before.
Uhm, in the Russian Collusion, Adam Shitface lair extraordinaire kept saying he had evidence that Russia had colluded but when asked to present it, the shitface never presented any. Also that fucker spent millions of dollars on investigations again finding out it was Hislery Campaign that paid for it..
Present it where? He tried to present evidence where it rightfully should be, at trial and the Republicans voted down evidence and witnesses. Why?
But fuck you demoncrap slaves anyway, you allow your crooked political masters to lie to you all the time, and when they are caught in that lie, you actually believe them , not the evidence presented in your face...Slaves of the progs, will be slaves of the progs...
I see, so your excuse about buying into Trump's lies is to claim that other people do it to? Good argument, I'm sure it will go far in overturning the election.
Not for the Russian Collusion you fucking retard, there wasnt any evidence, other than some bogus Fake Dossier that the Clinton Campaign concocted...fuck it must really suck to be as stupid as you, slave..
There was plenty of evidence of contact between Russia and the Trump campaign, to include sharing polling data which allowed Russia to micro target ads to specific demographics like people in the upper mid west. The Trump White House again, didn't cooperate with evidence. I don't remember the Democrats trying to overturn an election for it.
Where is the evidence in a court of law? Why is Trump asking for money yet you have to give him $5000 dollars before a single cent goes to this idiotic fraud?
politicalwire.com
You have it backwards. You report your whole case to the court, and give the public just the highlights. Not the other way around.That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.
The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.
In courts they should present only what they can prove. In public there is no harm in presenting the "bombshell" claims, which still need a lot more investigation to determine whether they are correct or not. Those claims only drag the cases down.
We will see what happens...
You have it backwards. You report your whole case to the court, and give the public just the highlights. Not the other way around.That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.
The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.
In courts they should present only what they can prove. In public there is no harm in presenting the "bombshell" claims, which still need a lot more investigation to determine whether they are correct or not. Those claims only drag the cases down.
We will see what happens...
Yes, there's a lot of harm.
There are death threats against people because Trump's supporters are being ginned up by false claims of fraud by the liars, thieves and grifters in the White House and enablers.
There is tremendous harm.You have it backwards. You report your whole case to the court, and give the public just the highlights. Not the other way around.That is stupid, he was only referring to that one claim.
The Trump campaign lawsuit was a bit poorly crafted though. As is the Powell case, they should only run with what they can prove with 100% certainty. Indeed, the lawsuit SHOULD be different from what they present to the public.
In courts they should present only what they can prove. In public there is no harm in presenting the "bombshell" claims, which still need a lot more investigation to determine whether they are correct or not. Those claims only drag the cases down.
We will see what happens...
When The Great Reset comes and you have no privacy, and no private property and you are standing in line to punch your ticket to Hell by accepting your Covi Pass 666 Quantum Dot Matrix Tattoo aka Mark of The Beast, you will say to yourself, "yah this is just a fairy tale, those guys were a bunch of loons" and then you will find yourself going through The Tribulation caught between The Wrath of God, and The Tyranny of Satan and his puppet AntiChrist, and then Judgment and Hell.God laughs at the wicked who make a mockery of justice and defraud the poor and the widow of their voice. He laughs at you because He knows your end, and knows the end of your schemes.
God doesn't pick loons who think there's a global conspiracy to wipe out 6 billion people on earth to speak for Him.
Then you will spend an eternity in Hell suffering and in torment asking yourself why you refused to listen to anyone that really was just trying to pull your wicked ass out of the fire. Mark it down. That is your future.
Yes, these events will take out 5 Billion People. And AntiChrist probably kills a Billion Himself.
These are the curses poured out on The Earth during the 7 year reign of Anti Christ and New World Order during The Tribulation or in the book of Daniel, called The Time of Jacob's Trouble.View attachment 424299
View attachment 424300
View attachment 424298
Have fun with all that, or avoid it by turning your life over to Messiah.
I hope somebody told you that the postmaster DeJoy gave a standard SOP for handling out of state ballotsExactly, there had to be a paper trail. Should be easy to prove or disprove.Both said they really had no party, and it seemed little interest in politics. They didn't know what was in the ballot envelops and of course, couldn't open them up. As a truck driver, I know for a fact that log books, shipping documents, receiving documents are all kept on file. The person receiving the freight has to sign for it.
Same with back dating at the post office. A simple audit will tell if mail was or wasn't processed at the times indicated. Seems like a big risk for little reward.
