ALL 11 Alternate (Fake) Electors, Including GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Indicted In Arizona!

[j-mac]

A pity you're incapable of presenting a cogent rebuttal.

I don’t wrestle with pigs

 

[j-mac]

It’s illegal to pretend to be an elector when you aren’t.

Lynchings used to be a part of the system. Is that your next revival?

Would you like that?

 

[cnm]

I don’t wrestle with pigs

You enjoy it too much?

 

[j-mac]

Falsely affirming in a federal election is considered legal on your planet?

Questioning election results illegal in yours?

 

[Marener]

Would you like that?

According to you, since it's our history it's fair game.

But that just shows how absolutely absurd your argument is. Just because we had fake electors in the 19th century doesn't mean it's okay. Those elections were incredibly corrupt. We aren't going back to the corrupt system. Just like we aren't going back to lynchings or any of the other illegal and corrupt practices from the dredges of our history.

 

[OldFlame]

The electors were not certified by an ascertaining certifier.

Who was the 'ascertaining certifier'?

 

[j-mac]

According to you, since it's our history it's fair game.

But that just shows how absolutely absurd your argument is. Just because we had fake electors in the 19th century doesn't mean it's okay. Those elections were incredibly corrupt. We aren't going back to the corrupt system. Just like we aren't going back to lynchings or any of the other illegal and corrupt practices from the dredges of our history.

How many were jailed?

 

[Faun]

It is what it is…Good, Bad, and the ugly….still doesn’t mean that anything illegal was done…So, am I to green from your posts in here, that you think it’s illegal to question the result of an election? Or just ones where dems are the stated winner?

Of course something illegal was done. Legitimate slates of electors must be certified by their state to be legitimate electors...

Roles and Responsibilities in the Electoral College Process | National Archives

www.archives.gov

• list the names of the electors chosen by the voters and the number of votes received.

• list the names of all other candidates for elector and the number of votes received.

• be signed by the Executive and carry the seal of the State.

• contain at least one security feature, as determined by the State, for purposes of verifying the authenticity of the certificate.

 

[Faun]

Who was the 'ascertaining certifier'?

In Arizona, it's the Secretary of State.

 

[Marener]

How many were jailed?

It was just part of the system back then.

 

[j-mac]

Of course something illegal was done. Legitimate slates of electors must be certified by their state to be legitimate electors...

Roles and Responsibilities in the Electoral College Process | National Archives

www.archives.gov

​

• list the names of the electors chosen by the voters and the number of votes received.

• list the names of all other candidates for elector and the number of votes received.

• be signed by the Executive and carry the seal of the State.

• contain at least one security feature, as determined by the State, for purposes of verifying the authenticity of the certificate.

How long before you say voting for anyone other than democrats is illegal?

 

[OldFlame]

These were not alternate electors, they were fake electors. Alternate electors are certified as genuine electors by their state. Fake electors are not.

So tell us how these 'fake electors' were going to be accepted by Pence and counted?

 

[j-mac]

It was just part of the system back then.

So, none?

 

[Faun]

I don’t wrestle with pigs

That's because you know even a pig can beat you.

 

[OldFlame]

It’s absolutely not our system. The system is that the states certify the electors and Congress counts them.

A bunch of political hacks pretending to be electors is not part of the system.

No one gives a shit about the super corrupt elections from the 1850s.

Tell us how congress counts electors that aren't certified?

Thought elections couldn't be corrupt, let alone 'super' corrupt?

 

[Marener]

So, none?

No idea, and also not relevant.

Fake electors being a part of corrupt elections in the 19th century has no bearing on their legality today.

 

[Faun]

Questioning election results illegal in yours?

Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.

 

[OldFlame]

Our history is incredibly corrupt. Is that your attempt to claim precedent?

Another who hates her country and wants it fundamentally transformed... via the corruption that she claims to hate.

If you think we were corrupt in the past, ain't nothing like today's corruption, that you support.

 

[OldFlame]

Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.

Tell us how congress counts uncertified electors?

 

[Marener]

Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.

These losers love the bait and switch.

Yeah, they introduced fraudulent electors and tried to disrupt the electoral vote counting to deprive states of their actual electoral votes.

But that's just "questioning the election".