Screw You Harry Reid

[kwc57]

"We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president’s constitutional duty to pick nominees.

Republicans should not insult the American people’s intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not."

Reid to GOP: For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction

Remember Harry Reid? The guy who singlehandedly brought the government to a grinding halt for 2 years by killing almost 400 bipartisan bills. The guy who cost the Democrats control of the Senate because of killing almost 400 bills and no one running for reelection could point to any accomplishment made as a result. Yeah, that Harry Reid, partisan obstructionist extraordinaire. He has the gall to once again project his actions on Republicans and say that their actions are unprecedented. The guy who killed 400 bills and gridlocked the government for 2 years. Fuck you Harry Reid and that old nag Pelosi that you rode in on. The lying sack of shit needs to take his drool bucket and go home and vegetate.

In addition to his own partisan obstructionism, he's lying about no precedent. The Senate Dems in 1960 passed a resolution against election year supreme court appointments.

Blog: Dems in Senate passed a resolution in1960 against election year Supreme Court appointments

 

[konradv]

Quit living in the past. If the Republicans hold up this nomination, it will only solidify their position as the party of obstruction going into the general. The percentage of people who remember 1960 is small and the number that care is even smaller.

 

[Kosh]

Quit living in the past. If the Republicans hold up this nomination, it will only solidify their position as the party of obstruction going into the general. The percentage of people who remember 1960 is small and the number that care is even smaller.

Oh poor left drones have to ignore the hypocrisy of Reid!

Go Figure that one!

 

[konradv]

Quit living in the past. If the Republicans hold up this nomination, it will only solidify their position as the party of obstruction going into the general. The percentage of people who remember 1960 is small and the number that care is even smaller.

Oh poor left drones have to ignore the hypocrisy of Reid! Go Figure that one!

Like I said, NOBODY cares. Proof: you just responded.

 

[Kosh]

Quit living in the past. If the Republicans hold up this nomination, it will only solidify their position as the party of obstruction going into the general. The percentage of people who remember 1960 is small and the number that care is even smaller.

Oh poor left drones have to ignore the hypocrisy of Reid! Go Figure that one!

Like I said, NOBODY cares. Proof: you just responded.

My the irony impaired far left drones are at it again today!

 

[Camp]

"We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president’s constitutional duty to pick nominees.

Republicans should not insult the American people’s intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not."

Reid to GOP: For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction

Remember Harry Reid? The guy who singlehandedly brought the government to a grinding halt for 2 years by killing almost 400 bipartisan bills. The guy who cost the Democrats control of the Senate because of killing almost 400 bills and no one running for reelection could point to any accomplishment made as a result. Yeah, that Harry Reid, partisan obstructionist extraordinaire. He has the gall to once again project his actions on Republicans and say that their actions are unprecedented. The guy who killed 400 bills and gridlocked the government for 2 years. Fuck you Harry Reid and that old nag Pelosi that you rode in on. The lying sack of shit needs to take his drool bucket and go home and vegetate.

In addition to his own partisan obstructionism, he's lying about no precedent. The Senate Dems in 1960 passed a resolution against election year supreme court appointments.

Blog: Dems in Senate passed a resolution in1960 against election year Supreme Court appointments

Republicans seem to be relying on a lot of distortions on this issue. Distortions only give tempory talking points and are usually easily debunked. In this case, the resolution was non-binding, but more importantly, only dealt with recess appointments. Two pretty major factors to be ignored and left out.

www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415

 

[DGS49]

Is this the same Harry Reid that claimed a few years ago to have "proof" that Mitt Romney didn't pay any income taxes?

The one that killed our 45Billion investment in Yucca Mountain for no reason?

Oh yeah, lots of people are listening to him!

 

[Kosh]

"We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president’s constitutional duty to pick nominees.

Republicans should not insult the American people’s intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not."

Reid to GOP: For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction

Remember Harry Reid? The guy who singlehandedly brought the government to a grinding halt for 2 years by killing almost 400 bipartisan bills. The guy who cost the Democrats control of the Senate because of killing almost 400 bills and no one running for reelection could point to any accomplishment made as a result. Yeah, that Harry Reid, partisan obstructionist extraordinaire. He has the gall to once again project his actions on Republicans and say that their actions are unprecedented. The guy who killed 400 bills and gridlocked the government for 2 years. Fuck you Harry Reid and that old nag Pelosi that you rode in on. The lying sack of shit needs to take his drool bucket and go home and vegetate.

In addition to his own partisan obstructionism, he's lying about no precedent. The Senate Dems in 1960 passed a resolution against election year supreme court appointments.

Blog: Dems in Senate passed a resolution in1960 against election year Supreme Court appointments

Republicans seem to be relying on a lot of distortions on this issue. Distortions only give tempory talking points and are usually easily debunked. In this case, the resolution was non-binding, but more importantly, only dealt with recess appointments. Two pretty major factors to be ignored and left out.

Oh my the irony impaired far left drones are at it again!

I bet if Obama could nominate himself he would!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

A 55 year old resolution is neither law nor binding; Reid and the president are correct, Obama is at liberty to put forward the nomination, the Senate will respond as it sees fit.

 

[Kosh]

A 55 year old resolution is neither law nor binding; Reid and the president are correct, Obama is at liberty to put forward the nomination, the Senate will respond as it sees fit.

See how the far left drones claim something to be irrelevant, but to them the Constitution (a 200 year old resolution) is irrelevant to them as well..

 

[turzovka]

"We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president’s constitutional duty to pick nominees.

Republicans should not insult the American people’s intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not."

Reid to GOP: For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction

Remember Harry Reid? The guy who singlehandedly brought the government to a grinding halt for 2 years by killing almost 400 bipartisan bills. The guy who cost the Democrats control of the Senate because of killing almost 400 bills and no one running for reelection could point to any accomplishment made as a result. Yeah, that Harry Reid, partisan obstructionist extraordinaire. He has the gall to once again project his actions on Republicans and say that their actions are unprecedented. The guy who killed 400 bills and gridlocked the government for 2 years. Fuck you Harry Reid and that old nag Pelosi that you rode in on. The lying sack of shit needs to take his drool bucket and go home and vegetate.

In addition to his own partisan obstructionism, he's lying about no precedent. The Senate Dems in 1960 passed a resolution against election year supreme court appointments.

Blog: Dems in Senate passed a resolution in1960 against election year Supreme Court appointments

Thanks for pointing out the obvious. Too bad the mainstream media does not have the honor or courage to do the same.

Harry Reid. If anyone could give Barack a run for his money for being the most odious and despicable person in Washington the last 7 years.

 

[tinydancer]

Didn't someone have up a thread about Schumer vowing to block any potential appointments by President Bush?

 

[ogibillm]

Quit living in the past. If the Republicans hold up this nomination, it will only solidify their position as the party of obstruction going into the general. The percentage of people who remember 1960 is small and the number that care is even smaller.

Oh poor left drones have to ignore the hypocrisy of Reid!

Go Figure that one!

you want to address the hypocrisy of the "constitutional option"

 

[tinydancer]

Found the link. Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.



http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/FLASHBACK: In 2007, Schumer Called For Blocking All Bush Supreme Court Nominations

 

[turzovka]

Found the link. Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.



http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/FLASHBACK: In 2007, Schumer Called For Blocking All Bush Supreme Court Nominations

Link not really working. But thanks for the effort. Too bad die hard liberals have their ears and eyes covered.

 

[Camp]

Found the link. Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.



http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/FLASHBACK: In 2007, Schumer Called For Blocking All Bush Supreme Court Nominations

It is an inaccurate and distorted talking point that is being debunked. He did not call for "no vote" or "no hearings", nor did he call for no consideration of anyone. He proposed not confirming extremist right wing judges and his comments referred to a theoretical situaltion, not an actual occuring situation.

 

[Camp]

Found the link. Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.



http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/FLASHBACK: In 2007, Schumer Called For Blocking All Bush Supreme Court Nominations

Link not really working. But thanks for the effort. Too bad die hard liberals have their ears and eyes covered.

It is easy to find, they even have it on youtube.

 

[jillian]

"We are entering uncharted waters in the history of the U.S. system of checks and balances, with potentially momentous consequences. Having gridlocked the Senate for years, Republicans now want to gridlock the Supreme Court with a campaign of partisan sabotage aimed at denying the president’s constitutional duty to pick nominees.

Republicans should not insult the American people’s intelligence by pretending there is historical precedent for what they are about to do. There is not."

Reid to GOP: For the good of the country, stop your nakedly partisan obstruction

Remember Harry Reid? The guy who singlehandedly brought the government to a grinding halt for 2 years by killing almost 400 bipartisan bills. The guy who cost the Democrats control of the Senate because of killing almost 400 bills and no one running for reelection could point to any accomplishment made as a result. Yeah, that Harry Reid, partisan obstructionist extraordinaire. He has the gall to once again project his actions on Republicans and say that their actions are unprecedented. The guy who killed 400 bills and gridlocked the government for 2 years. Fuck you Harry Reid and that old nag Pelosi that you rode in on. The lying sack of shit needs to take his drool bucket and go home and vegetate.

In addition to his own partisan obstructionism, he's lying about no precedent. The Senate Dems in 1960 passed a resolution against election year supreme court appointments.

Blog: Dems in Senate passed a resolution in1960 against election year Supreme Court appointments

poor winger.... you really should stop stamping your feet. why should the next president have four nominations just so you wingers can do what you've tried to do to this president for seven years?

you should probably get over it.

me? I think you're going to be so sorry when record numbers of dems come out to vote in November over this just to kick your obstructive butts.

 

[rightwinger]

Harry is correct

It is unprecedented to suggest that a sitting President does not have a right to select a Supreme Court nominee in his last year of office

 

[jillian]

Found the link. Hypocrisy thy name is liberal.



http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/14/f...-all-bush-supreme-court-nominations/FLASHBACK: In 2007, Schumer Called For Blocking All Bush Supreme Court Nominations

It is an inaccurate and distorted talking point that is being debunked. He did not call for "no vote" or "no hearings", nor did he call for no consideration of anyone. He proposed not confirming extremist right wing judges and his comments referred to a theoretical situaltion, not an actual occuring situation.

why would it post anything different from what it always posts?

I have also already posted schumer's complete post which was UNLESS THE APPOINTEE IS MAINSTREAM, the senate should filibuster. it was not a blanket refusal. it was just a refusal to appoint a psycho. there was a justice confirmed unanimously to the D.C. circuit.... clearly not a psycho and clearly qualified.

that's what the hacks are leaving out. but then again, she's never posted anything that wasn't a lie in her life.