Trump's Gauntlet

[Marener]

I agree there. But if the election was indeed stolen, life imprisonment for the thieves would be in order.

That's not going to happen.

If the election had been stolen, I'd be more than happy to see those responsible prosecuted once you find any evidence to suppor the prosectuion.

That's didn't happen. Trump talks about evidence but never produces anything.

Yet you believe it anyway. Again, believing without evidence. MAGA is a lot like a religion.

 

[daveman]

Are Trump's watches worth $100k?

Let me know what law you think is relevant here.

Bidens Used Web of Shell Companies to Conceal Foreign Cash, Bank Records Obtained by House GOP Reveal​

Is influence peddling legal?

 

[Rawley]

When did Biden get a subpoena and then obstruct justice by claiming to have complied with it while keeping documents that should have been turned over?

"intellectual honesty?" LOL

 

[Concerned American]

When did Biden get a subpoena and then obstruct justice by claiming to have complied with it while keeping documents that should have been turned over?

Trump didn't get a LEGAL subpoena. Jack Smith had no authority to issue it.

 

[Marener]

Is influence peddling legal?

Influence peddling is not a legal term. You need something more specific.

 

[Marener]

Trump didn't get a LEGAL subpoena. Jack Smith had no authority to issue it.

Trump did not challenge the legality of the subpoena. He certainly could have. He didn't.

So Trump's choice to defy the subpoena was a willful violation of the law from someone who clearly doesn't see themselves as beholden to it.

And why would they with garbage people like you who agree with him?

 

[daveman]

When did Biden get a subpoena and then obstruct justice by claiming to have complied with it while keeping documents that should have been turned over?

He didn't have to do any of that. DoJ concluded Biden broke the law, but didn't mean to, it was just an ooopsie because he's a doddering old man.

Democrats are above the law.

 

[daveman]

If the election had been stolen, I'd be more than happy to see those responsible prosecuted once you find any evidence to suppor the prosectuion.

That's didn't happen. Trump talks about evidence but never produces anything.

Yet you believe it anyway. Again, believing without evidence. MAGA is a lot like a religion.

I don't believe I've ever said the 2020 election was stolen. In my post to which you're replying, I said, "...if the election was indeed stolen..."

Do you know what the word "if" means?

 

[daveman]

Influence peddling is not a legal term. You need something more specific.

Okay. How about bribery? Is that legal?

 

[Marener]

He didn't have to do any of that. DoJ concluded Biden broke the law, but didn't mean to, it was just an ooopsie because he's a doddering old man.

Democrats are above the law.

Your statement is self contradictory.

If he didn’t intend to break the law, then he didn’t break the law. The law requires willfulness.

Trump certainly could have easily had this defense had he complied with the subpoena. After it was discovered he kept documents after getting the subpoena, he really couldn’t claim such a thing.

 

[Marener]

Okay. How about bribery? Is that legal?

Bribery is a legal term and it’s definitely not legal.

But you have to have evidence of a bribe. That means money or something or value in exchange for an official act.

What would that be?

 

[Concerned American]

And why would they with garbage people like you who agree with him?

Gee, ^^^^ this and you wonder why the majority voted against the democrats. You really should get a handle on your hypocrisy. Biden had NO authority to possess those docs. He stored them insecurely. Trump had authority to possess them and they were secured according to National Archives instructions. It was LAWFARE, pure and simple. Why do you support people who use manipulated law to punish their opponents?

 

[daveman]

Your statement is self contradictory.

If he didn’t intend to break the law, then he didn’t break the law. The law requires willfulness.

Trump certainly could have easily had this defense had he complied with the subpoena. After it was discovered he kept documents after getting the subpoena, he really couldn’t claim such a thing.

You misunderstand. Biden and his lawyer SAID it was an ooopsie.

That doesn't mean it was. And it probably wasn't.

But Democrats are above the law.

 

[daveman]

Bribery is a legal term and it’s definitely not legal.

But you have to have evidence of a bribe. That means money or something or value in exchange for an official act.

What would that be?

I don't know. Wray never released the documentation, in violation of a subpoena. (I've heard that's a bad thing, by the way.)

Comer says Wray confirmed existence of record reporting alleged Biden bribery scheme, which the White House strongly refutes​

Once again -- proof that Democrats are above the law, and three-letter agencies protect Democrats.

 

[Marener]

Gee, ^^^^ this and you wonder why the majority voted against the democrats. You really should get a handle on your hypocrisy. Biden had NO authority to possess those docs. He stored them insecurely. Trump had authority to possess them and they were secured according to National Archives instructions. It was LAWFARE, pure and simple. Why do you support people who use manipulated law to punish their opponents?

Garbage like you aren’t the majority.

Trump had no authority to keep classified documents.
They weren’t not stored in accordance with any rules.

You believe false information.

 

[Marener]

You misunderstand. Biden and his lawyer SAID it was an ooopsie.

That doesn't mean it was. And it probably wasn't.

But Democrats are above the law.

Hur didn’t think he could convince a jury that it was intentional.

It would have been extremely easy to convince a jury Trump did it intentionally. Hell, Trump himself said so.

 

[Concerned American]

You believe false information.

Back at you hypocrite. Enjoy the next four years. ROTFLMFAO, LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

 

[Marener]

I don't know. Wray never released the documentation, in violation of a subpoena. (I've heard that's a bad thing, by the way.)

Comer says Wray confirmed existence of record reporting alleged Biden bribery scheme, which the White House strongly refutes​

Once again -- proof that Democrats are above the law, and three-letter agencies protect Democrats.

You do know that the guy who tried to report the bribery scheme is being prosecuted for making it up, right?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Everyone understands that an unethical administration targeted their political opponent with a highly partisan misuse of the DOJ.

Kangagruesome

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

DoJ concluded Biden broke the law, but didn't mean to, it was just an ooopsie because he's a doddering old man.

The Doddercrat Potty