Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,397 you're OK with accidentally killing normal kids

I oppose killing of all kids, That includes by accident by behaving responsibly any place children or pregnant women are present?

Here is my OK’s or not OK’s please read and refer to them not what you make up out of nothing I’ve ever written.

04620 dvng.22.08.10 #4,620 “you deny that after fertilization a new, genetically distinct human has come alive. Abortion is intended to kill that life.”​

04621 bvvgl.22.08.10 #4,621 “Well yes, but it's more like involuntary unborn baby slaughter”​

04622 nf.22.08.10 #4,622 My support for a woman to be able to choose to continue or end a pregnancy is based on my secular humanist respect for women as equals to men and no respect for what some Christians opine that sacred life begins at conception. I believe sacred life begins at viability and it should not be a matter that is to be determined by expecting politicians to vote on it. That is the most absurd idea I have ever heard.​
04739 dvng.22.08.10 #4,739 “the only correct way to see it is abortion ends a human life.”​
04761 nf.22.08.10 #4,761 Actually ding the scientifically correct way to say it, is abortion ends a not viable human life when the procedure is performed prior to 24 weeks after conception.”​
you deny that after fertilization a new, genetically distinct human has come alive.

involuntary unborn baby slaughter

killing normal kids


I AGREE WITH SAINT ding that after fertilization a new distinct human being has come alive..

Don’t know what his argument is after that.

nf.23.10.13 #11,401
 
" Caricatures Of Malevolence Against A Standard Of Required Personal Indifference "

* Prurience Of Self Edification For Licentious Projections *

O.m.g.
All neg eugenics minions are slavering, drooling, hand rubbing cretins. Caricatures of creepy evil.
The principles of individualism expect that individuals determine quality of life choices for themselves , which is understood as independence .

The actual freaks farmers in the elective abortion issue are the sanctimonious sacrosanct anthropocentric perspective with public policy intentions of delusion by abortion anti-choice marauders .
 
" Caricatures Of Malevolence Against A Standard Of Required Personal Indifference "

* Prurience Of Self Edification For Licentious Projections *


The principles of individualism expect that individuals determine quality of life choices for themselves , which is understood as independence .

The actual freaks farmers in the elective abortion issue are the sanctimonious sacrosanct anthropocentric perspective with public policy intentions of delusion by abortion anti-choice marauders .
Principles of indivualism is just negative eugenics-speak for "no rights for the weak, vulnerable or voiceless".
 
" Traitors To Principles Of Us Republic Easily Identifiable "

* Nit Twits Versus Knit Wits *

Principles of indivualism is just negative eugenics-speak for "no rights for the weak, vulnerable or voiceless".
The principles of non violence and individualism are the foundation of a us republic for a credo from a motto of e pluribus unum , which expects independence as individualism , with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals , and is delimited by safety and security .

The mental retardation for political science and civics in us republic has been facilitated by the liberal versus conservative paradigm - Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments .

* The We Are Fooling You Of We Are Ruling You *


* The Term Rights As Equivalent With Valid Or Correct Continues To Be Applied By Half Wits *

 
Last edited:
" Traitors To Principles Of Us Republic Easily Identifiable "

* Nit Twits Versus Knit Wits *


The principles of non violence and individualism are the foundation of us republic .

The mental retardation for political science and civics in us republic has been facilitated by the liberal versus conservative paradigm - Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments .

* The We Are Fooling You Of We Are Ruling You *


* The Term Rights As Equivalent With Valid Or Correct Continues To Be Applied By Half Wits *


" Traitors To Principles Of Us Republic Easily Identifiable "

* Nit Twits Versus Knit Wits *


The principles of non violence and individualism are the foundation of us republic .

The mental retardation for political science and civics in us republic has been facilitated by the liberal versus conservative paradigm - Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments .

* The We Are Fooling You Of We Are Ruling You *


* The Term Rights As Equivalent With Valid Or Correct Continues To Be Applied By Half Wits *

1697221632742.png
 
I believe what TrueAmerican Monkeye is trying to tell you Saint Koshergrl is that every woman who has met a live birth requirement has a full natural right to determine what goes on inside her body and that would include the 1 1/2 million eggs that she was born with.

You say the human being that might become needful of the use of her body is innocent, and has no voice. That is true, but that is nature. A human being that never had a brain and never had consciousness of course does not have a voice does not have a voice because it does not give a damn what happens to it half of all conceptions end up in a sewage treatment plant or in a landfill. Depending on your age, you may flush a few down the toilet yourself. You did not hear their voice or care.

Up to 21 weeks before consciousness/viability is possible in a fetus its mother is it voice. IF the mother decides she wants to give birth it has her voice and should be protected by society She can call that her kid, her baby, her fetus, her cashew, and that is none of your business.
 
I believe what TrueAmerican Monkeye is trying to tell you Saint Koshergrl is that every woman who has met a live birth requirement has a full natural right to determine what goes on inside her body and that would include the 1 1/2 million eggs that she was born with.

You say the human being that might become needful of the use of her body is innocent, and has no voice. That is true, but that is nature. A human being that never had a brain and never had consciousness of course does not have a voice does not have a voice because it does not give a damn what happens to it half of all conceptions end up in a sewage treatment plant or in a landfill. Depending on your age, you may flush a few down the toilet yourself. You did not hear their voice or care.

Up to 21 weeks before consciousness/viability is possible in a fetus its mother is it voice. IF the mother decides she wants to give birth it has her voice and should be protected by society She can call that her kid, her baby, her fetus, her cashew, and that is none of your business.
Eggs are not humans.
All humans begin their life at conception. Human rights adjure that we are capable of operating independent of nature and that each human has the responsibility to protect and not butcher their dependent offspring.
You either believe in Human rights for all humans, or you reject the notion of human rights.
All negative eugenics ghouls reject the notion of human rights.
PS I don't need an interpreter.. you all say exactly the same things. And we all recognize your script for what it is.
 
" Fealty Of Male Apex Predator Damned Dirty Apes "

* Anthropocentric Egoism For Natural Exception Through Delusions Of Grandeur *

Eggs are not humans.
All humans begin their life at conception.
The lives of all hue mammon began well before the conception of each .
 
" Which Is Worse Theistic Humanists Or Secular Humanists ? "

* Informed Consent Up To Speed Induction *

You either believe in Human rights for all humans, or you reject the notion of human rights.
Prior to entering into a social civil contract to be members of a collective state , an individual is subject to the moral relativism for event outcomes within nature , and to improve the odds for survival and quality of life , an individual exchanges natural freedoms for protected wrights according to a constitution , by which a collective state issues a retort for violations of legal pretexts .

The diversity of options available as public policy within collective states is not bound to epistemological absolutes , though not all perspectives are equally valid according to perspectivism .

The principles of non violence and individualism and antinomianism are considered to be a more valid than authoritarian dictates by a collective majority or by an affluent minority .

Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .

Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .

Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ?

 
" Apex Predator Damned Dirty Ape "

* Anthropocentric Egoism For Natural Exception Through Delusions Of Grandeur *


The lives of all hue mammon began well before conception .

" Which Is Worse Theistic Humanists Or Secular Humanists ? "

* Informed Consent Up To Speed Induction *


Prior to entering into a social civil contract to be members of a collective state , an individual is subject to the moral relativism for event outcomes within nature , and to improve the odds for survival and quality of life , an individual exchanges natural freedoms for protected wrights according to a constitution , by which a collective state issues a retort for violations of legal pretexts .

The diversity of options available as public policy within collective states is not bound to epistemological absolutes , though not all perspectives are equally valid according to perspectivism .

The principles of non violence and individualism and antinomianism are considered to be a more valid than authoritarian dictates by a collective majority or by an affluent minority .

Negative liberties represent protections , independence and individualism .

Positive liberties represent endowments , dependence and collectivism .

Does any agree or disagree that " equal wrights " advocates must make a distinction between negative and positive wrights ?

"Bla bla bla I am a negative eugenics minion. I spout lies meant to trick vulnerable women into killing their offspring". I told you, I already know your shtick.
 
" No Morbid Baby Dolls In Pickle Puss Collection While She Wantonly Dictates Others To Include Them "

* Willfully Ignorant And Delusional Preferring To Remain Detached From Reality *

"Bla bla bla I am a negative eugenics minion. I spout lies meant to trick vulnerable women into killing their offspring". I told you, I already know your shtick.
YOU ARE LYING by depicting all pregnancies as perfect and " without cause " .

About 3% of all conceptions are associated with major congenital malformations, many of them are lethal developmental defect and genetic in origin or teratogenic (adverse effects of the envi- ronment during gametogenesis or early embryogenesis).

Major congenital anomalies affect 2-3% of all pregnancies (1).
 
" No Morbid Baby Dolls In Pickle Puss Collection While She Wantonly Dictates Others To Include Them "

* Willfully Ignorant And Delusional Preferring To Remain Detached From Reality *


YOU ARE LYING by depicting all pregnancies as perfect and " without cause " .

About 3% of all conceptions are associated with major congenital malformations, many of them are lethal developmental defect and genetic in origin or teratogenic (adverse effects of the envi- ronment during gametogenesis or early embryogenesis).

Major congenital anomalies affect 2-3% of all pregnancies (1).
You must hate disabled ppl a lot.
 
That's what all murderers say.
cncrndmrcn.23.10.13 “I DGAF about what she does or if she has sex. She just needs to accept responsibility for the consequences and not murder another human.”​

There is no murder in the first 23 weeks based upon the number of brains in a pregnant woman’s body. There is only one brain. A fetus never develops brain life prior to 20 week limit of natural miscarriage and natural abortion.

Do you argue there is more than one brain in a pregnant woman’s body through the first 23 weeks?

No woman is obligated to accept the beliefs of dead Phyllis Schlafly, Archbishop Vigano, James Dobson or you that a fetus that never experiences consciousness is equal in value to her or equal to a born conscious infant. Why do yo think she owes you anything? You are nobody in her life?

nf.23.10,13

nf.23.20 #11,414
 
cncrndmrcn.23.10.13 “I DGAF about what she does or if she has sex. She just needs to accept responsibility for the consequences and not murder another human.”​

There is no murder in the first 23 weeks based upon the number of brains in a pregnant woman’s body. There is only one brain. A fetus never develops brain life prior to 20 week limit of natural miscarriage and natural abortion.

Do you argue there is more than one brain in a pregnant woman’s body through the first 23 weeks?

No woman is obligated to accept the beliefs of dead Phyllis Schlafly, Archbishop Vigano, James Dobson or you that a fetus that never experiences consciousness is equal in value to her or equal to a born conscious infant. Why do yo think she owes you anything? You are nobody in her life?

nf.23.10,13

nf.23.20 #11,414
Human rights aren't based on brains, you negative eugenics goon you...
 
kshrgrl.23.10.13
#11,415
Human rights aren't based on brains,
Being a conscious human being is based on having one’s own brain.

Human rights are not based upon what you think Saint Koshergrl when the living organism you want to be a proxy for is inside a person’s body whose inalienable rights are already firmly established and not questionable. You are nobody and you cannot cite one iota of the harm to you if a woman terminates the living human organism inside her body. You cannot be harmed and the woman is no threat to public safety just for having an abortion.

nf.23.10.13 #11,416 hvrn

see nf.23.09.27 #1 hvrm

see tddstrptrt.23.09.27 #6 hvrm

See nf.23.09.27 #7 to tddstrptrt.23.09.27 #6 hvrm

see nf.23.09.30 #41 hvrm
 
Last edited:
kshrgrl.23.10.13
#11,415

Being a conscious human being is based on having one’s own brain.

Human rights are not based upon what you think Saint Koshergrl when the living organism you want to be a proxy for is inside a person’s body whose inalienable rights are already firmly established and not questionable. You are nobody and you cannot cite one iota of the harm to you if a woman terminates the living human organism inside her body. You cannot be harmed and the woman is no threat to public safety just for having an abortion.

nf.23.10.13 #11,416 hvrn

see nf.23.09.27 #1 hvrm

see tddstrptrt.23.09.27 #6 hvrm

See nf.23.09.27 #7 to tddstrptrt.23.09.27 #6 hvrm

see nf.23.09.30 #41 hvrm
Yes, human rights are for humans regardless of age. You are anti human rights. The whole purpose of human rights is to protect us from killers who think weak ppl have no value and should be eradicated. To deny that is to deny human rights.
 
Yes, human rights are for humans regardless of age.
Individual rights starts at birth - an act of independence. - prior to birth all rights belong to the mother. - oinxluding the right to terminate her own child - USSC made it clear - The right of the fetus to be granted full term gestation is not in the Constitution and the mother violated no person’s rights if she terminates her pregnancy as her choice.
 
Individual rights starts at birth - an act of independence. - prior to birth all rights belong to the mother. - oinxluding the right to terminate her own child - USSC made it clear - The right of the fetus to be granted full term gestation is not in the Constitution and the mother violated no person’s rights if she terminates her pregnancy as her choice.
Nope rights are for all humans.
 
Again... that's not what the science shows. The science shows a human being in its early stages of the human life cycle.
Nope rights are for all humans.
Just never has it been a right to force full term gestation on potential momma for human fetuses in the early stages of it’s development in the human life cycle per Saint Ding in post dvng.23.10.13 #503
until RvW gave fetuses a right at a reasonable stage considered viable outside the womb if necessary.

Stupid human Republican women beings came along like Republican Phyllis Schlafly *now deceased and struck that settled law right for fetuses down after fifty years which has politically pissed off every single woman in America who believe women are as a minimum equal to men or far superior to the white idiot males who want obedience and submission to white male JudeoChristian God designed dominion over earthly existence.

I’d like to see you drop your obsession with labeling 2/3 of the US Population “murderers” and nourish your mind with a dose of Catholic rational American style theism:


So far from despairing at the injustices and cruelties of human existence, both men recognized the goodness of life and sought to create ways to better understand their fellow men, to provide the intellectual architecture for a just and decent society, and to pass this on to future generations. They would have rejected, albeit not without reasoned argument, the nihilism and relativism that pervade our culture. If it turned on these issues, their conversation would surely have been a lively one.​
J. Augustine Di Noia, O.P. is the Archbishop Secretary of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.​

Saint Thomas Aquinas wouid be part of the baby killer cult if he were to live in Ameruca today

nf.23.19.14 #11,420
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top