Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[koshergrl]

" Quality Of Infinitude Yielding Magnanimous Volumes Of Anxiety And Paranoia "

* Hung Up On Rites Of Behavior Emulating Being And Becoming Through Some Transition *

There goes the abortion anti-choice trope again lying that women are seeking " without cause abortion " , when women are only seeking " with cause abortion " , the abortion anti-choice trope refers to the lie with an " abortion on demand " tag .

* Oh My A Very High Pile Of Hubris *

The roe v wade decision concluded that states interest could begin post natural viability and that states could proscribe abortion in the third trimester with exceptions to save the life of the mother , which means that roe v wade allowed states to proscribe " without cause " abortion , but the traitors to principles of us republic did not seek to apply it .

In lieu of live birth requirement for equal protection with a citizen , given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth , roe v wade ruled that state interests in protecting a " potential ( wright ) to life " could begin post natural viability .

The abortion anti-choice remains guided with willful ignorance .

* Proclaiming The Clause Of Santa *

Does it help to lie about the meaning of an after life as anything other than passing on ones genetic identity , one haploid at a a time , so than another , both figuratively and literally as themselves , through a sophisticated physical state , may have an opportunity to experience the sentience , sapience and introspection afforded as life ?

Stop confusing the success criteria of nature with the means by which to satisfy its subjective altruism .

Sorry, the decent ppl believe in and uphold human rights.

 

[beagle9]

Why do you think the children of victims have less value than, say, your children?
BTW, abortion doesn't cure rape. That lie that you tell and the pressure brought against victims telling them they "must" kill their offspring is a form of coercion and victim shaming.

If a pregnancy happens in result of a rape or incest, then the victim should absolutely have the option to end that pregnancy immediately, and not after weeks or months of the pregnancy somehow maturing.

It must be "Immediately" !!!!!!!!

If the child is under age, then the parents should be able to make the decision for the child "immediately" after the act is found out about early enough, and not weeks or months later.

Otherwise a DNC can be performed and not what is referred to as an abortion in such an early stage.

Now if the parent's don't believe in the stopping of a pregnancy for say their under aged daughter, then they should be ready to help her in her trials of pregnancy, and even take responsibility for the child if their daughter rejects the child after birth.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" We The People Understand The Nature Of Nature And Legal Positivism Of Law "

* Imbecilic Public Policy Fanatics Traitors To A Us Republican Party *

Sorry, the decent ppl believe in and uphold human rights.

This moniker represents the abortion choice republicans of us republic , while the abortion anti-choice clucks are stopping progress and even exacerbating the north american problem of illegal immigration .

Desantis Is A Knights Of Columbus Tool

" Desantis Is A Knights Of Columbus Tool " * Government Moochers Promoting Inundation Of US With Illegal Immigrants And State Funded Sectarianism In Violation of Establishment Claus * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_of_Columbus Membership is limited to practicing Catholic men.[3] It...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[koshergrl]

If a pregnancy happens in result of a rape or incest, then the victim should absolutely have the option to end that pregnancy immediately, and not after weeks or months of the pregnancy somehow maturing.

It must be "Immediately" !!!!!!!!

If the child is under age, then the parents should be able to make the decision for the child "immediately" after the act is found out about early enough, and not weeks or months later.

Otherwise a DNC can be performed and not what is referred to as an abortion in such an early stage.

Now if the parent's don't believe in the stopping of a pregnancy for say their under aged daughter, then they should be ready to help her in her trials of pregnancy, and even take responsibility for the child if their daughter rejects the child after birth.

So you believe in the coercion of victims and the butchery of their children.

You are anti human rights, and pro coercion. Got it.

Meanwhile.. abortion adds to trauma. It does not cure sa.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Jainism Without The Rigor "

* Miss Placed Sky Is Falling Arcane Logic *

Pregnancy is a biological function..not a crime. It
Wrong. Pregnancy is a right. It is also a biological function and "consent" is not part of the picture.

Yearn perspectives , while adhering with a deontology for puritanism , yearn perspective are lacking in more advantageous options available through consequentialism and utilitarianism .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pleas To Be Taken Serious While Evidently Disingenuous "

* Small Lies Leading Fools Into Greater Problems *

So you believe in the coercion of victims and the butchery of their children.

Yearn writings include false equivalences and suggestions that killing children is occurring , while the definition of a child is between birth and adolescence .

* Philosopher King Ship Of Conceited Dictators *

Meanwhile.. abortion adds to trauma. It does not cure sa.

Yeah , cause you know everything .

 

[beagle9]

So you believe in the coercion of victims and the butchery of their children.

You are anti human rights, and pro coercion. Got it.

Meanwhile.. abortion adds to trauma. It does not cure sa.

You are an emotional wreck, how about talking to me when you gain back your common sense on the issue.

 

[koshergrl]

" Pleas To Be Taken Serious While Evidently Disingenuous "

* Small Lies Leading Fools Into Greater Problems *

Yearn writings include false equivalences and suggestions that killing children is occurring , while the definition of a child is between birth and adolescence .

* Philosopher King Ship Of Conceited Dictators *

Yeah , cause you know everything .

Human rights are universal.

 

[koshergrl]

You are an emotional wreck, how about talking to me when you gain back your common sense on the issue.

You're just another anti human rights hysteric who targets victims.

 

[beagle9]

You're just another anti human rights hysteric who targets victims.

Thank goodness your bull shite is the definition of delusional, because my feelings might be hurt if they weren't.

 

[koshergrl]

Thank goodness your bull shite is the definition of delusional, because my feelings might be hurt if they weren't.

It's generally accepted that baby killing abortion ghouls that target, gaslight and coerce women into killing their offspring don't have human emotions aside from greed, jealousy and hatred.

 

[koshergrl]

You are an emotional wreck, how about talking to me when you gain back your common sense on the issue.

More gaslighting, the hallmark of abusers and human traffickers who coerce vulnerable women into participating in negative eugenics. . You're in good company.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Japhetic Ash Kin Nazi Affecting Demarcations For Eponymous Patriarchal Rites Thorough Gas Lighting Of Phoenix Fire Temples "

* Propaganda Day Won Is To Accuse Adversaries Of Crimes For Which One Is Also Guilty *

More gaslighting, the hallmark of abusers and human traffickers who coerce vulnerable women into participating in negative eugenics. . You're in good company.

Where is the empirical evidence from natural events where vulnerably women are being coerced into negative eugenics ?

What is yearn intended or normative meaning expected to be associated with terms " negative eugenics " ?

Does " negative eugenics " include a connotation that non elective , coerced , abortion is being implemented against an other clad that is based on Racemization - Wikipedia differences ?

Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles For Within Ones Own Race

" Non Aggression Principles For Other Races Towards Ones Own Race And Non Violence Principles Within Ones Own Race " * Hypocrisy Or Not Hypocrisy ? * * Racist Or Not Racist ? *

www.usmessageboard.com

Does " negative eugenics " include a connotation that non elective , coerced , live birth is being implemented against an other clad that is based on Racemization - Wikipedia differences ?

Are Europe And The US Expected To Reflect Proportions Of The Global Demographic When The Left Wing Is Through With Them ?

" Are Europe And The US Expected To Reflect Proportions Of The Global Demographic When The Left Wing Is Through With Them ? " * Motivations For Reverse Racism * Add up the total number of individuals around the world according to race and which proportion of the global demographic does each...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Pregnant-human’s rights protected by a “potato” as individual liberty warrants and American voters will to have it NFBW.23.10.14 #11,426

That's what all murderers say.

murder

cncrndmrcn.23.10.13 “I DGAF about what she does or if she has sex. She just needs to accept responsibility for the consequences and not murder another human.”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,414 There is no murder in the first 23 weeks based upon the number of brains in a pregnant woman’s body. There is only one brain. A fetus never develops brain life prior to 20 week limit of natural miscarriage and natural abortion.​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,415 “Human rights aren't based on brains”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,416 “Being a conscious human being is based on having one’s own brain.”​

​

Kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,417 “human rights are for humans regardless of age.”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,418 “Individual rights start at birth - an act of independence.” THE FIRST act OF INDEPENDENCE​

​

Kshrgrl.23.10.13. #11,419 “Nope rights are for all humans”​

​

nf.23.19.14 #11,420 “Just never has it been a right to force full term gestation on potential momma for human fetuses in the early stages of it’s development in the human life cycle per Saint Ding in post dvng.23.10.13 #503 “​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,421 “Pregnancy is a biological function..not a crime.”​

AbortIon, like pregnancy, is a biological function not a crime agains an individual or the state. It causes no harm.​

​

nf.23.10.14 #11,426 “AbortIon, like pregnancy, is a biological function not a crime against an individual or the state. It causes no harm.​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427 (shot or perp & victim argvment) to nf.23.10.14 #11,426 “No, elective abortion isn't a biological function any more than being shot is a biological function.”​

​

In the (perp & victim argvment kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427) There must be at least two individual living functional brains involved. Abortion whether elective or natural involves only ONE and only one stream of human consciousness. Abortion has no victim or public consciousness of loss because end of life natural or by choice is a private matter as in nobody else’s fucking business.

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427 “No, human rights are not assigned in according to brain function.. “​

​

Never having developed a brain or individual consciousness the living human organism with unique DNA living in a womb has no rights except the rights granted by the human consciousness of the person that has the body that supports it. nf.23.10.14 #11,454

 

[koshergrl]

Pregnant-human’s rights protected by a “potato” as individual liberty warrants and American voters will to have it NFBW.23.10.14 #11,426

cncrndmrcn.23.10.13 “I DGAF about what she does or if she has sex. She just needs to accept responsibility for the consequences and not murder another human.”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,414 There is no murder in the first 23 weeks based upon the number of brains in a pregnant woman’s body. There is only one brain. A fetus never develops brain life prior to 20 week limit of natural miscarriage and natural abortion.​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,415 “Human rights aren't based on brains”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,416 “Being a conscious human being is based on having one’s own brain.”​

​

Kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,417 “human rights are for humans regardless of age.”​

​

nf.23.10.13 #11,418 “Individual rights start at birth - an act of independence.” THE FIRST act OF INDEPENDENCE​

​

Kshrgrl.23.10.13. #11,419 “Nope rights are for all humans”​

​

nf.23.19.14 #11,420 “Just never has it been a right to force full term gestation on potential momma for human fetuses in the early stages of it’s development in the human life cycle per Saint Ding in post dvng.23.10.13 #503 “​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,421 “Pregnancy is a biological function..not a crime.”​

AbortIon, like pregnancy, is a biological function not a crime agains an individual or the state. It causes no harm.​

​

nf.23.10.14 #11,426 “AbortIon, like pregnancy, is a biological function not a crime against an individual or the state. It causes no harm.​

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427 (shot or perp & victim argvment) to nf.23.10.14 #11,426 “No, elective abortion isn't a biological function any more than being shot is a biological function.”​

​

In the (perp & victim argvment kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427) There must be at least two individual living functional brains involved. Abortion whether elective or natural involves only ONE and only one stream of human consciousness. Abortion has no victim or public consciousness of loss because end of life natural or by choice is a private matter as in nobody else’s fucking business.

​

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427 “No, human rights are not assigned in according to brain function.. “​

​

Never having developed a brain or individual consciousness the living human organism with unique DNA living in a womb has no rights except the rights granted by the human consciousness of the person that has the body that supports it. nf.23.10.14 #11,454

Are you trying to communicate something? Or are you on acid?

 

[beagle9]

It's generally accepted that baby killing abortion ghouls that target, gaslight and coerce women into killing their offspring don't have human emotions aside from greed, jealousy and hatred.

Are you stupid or something ? I'm against abortion except with the exception of stopping a potential pregnancy before it becomes a baby developing in the womb, otherwise if the woman or minor is the victim of a rape or incest at hand.

You requiring a minor or a women to go forth with a potential pregnancy against her will, otherwise after being raped or the victim of incest is as monstrous as it gets. Get help please, and join the common sense crowd after getting that help.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Are you trying to communicate something? Or are you on acid?

I just skip over his posts dont even try to read that drival.

 

[koshergrl]

Are you stupid or something ? I'm against abortion except with the exception of stopping a potential pregnancy before it becomes a baby developing in the womb, otherwise if the woman or minor is the victim of a rape or incest at hand.

You requiring a minor or a women to go forth with a potential pregnancy against her will, otherwise after being raped or the victim of incest is as monstrous as it gets. Get help please, and join the common sense crowd after getting that help.

There are only two sides to human rights. You either endorse them for all humanity.. or you don't endorse them at all.

Sorry there is no "I believe in human rights except for ppl who were created in a particular circumstance...those don't count".
So do you believe ALL victims of crimes should be relieved of their human rights? Or just the dumb ones/poor ones/small ones?

 

[koshergrl]

I just skip over his posts dont even try to read that drival.

Yikes

 

[whutTHEYsay]

communicate

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,455 Are you trying to communicate something?


Yes. I am doing my best to communicate with all Christians who believe they have a right or justification to force all American women of all religious beliefs or non-belief to full term gestation against their will.

Here is the latest pearl on the string of our argument that is being documented for future reference.

kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427 (shot or perp & victim argvment) to nf.23.10.14 #11,426 “No, elective abortion isn't a biological function any more than being shot is a biological function.”​

​

In the (perp & victim argvment see kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,427) There must be at least two individual living functional brains involved. Abortion whether elective or natural involves only ONE {brain} and only one stream of human consciousness. Abortion has no victim or public consciousness of loss because end of {fetal} life natural or by choice is a private matter as in nobody else’s fucking business.​

I’ve asked but you won’t respond in a communicative way whether you agree that a 24 week pregnancy involves more than one brain and one human consciousness.

I must assume you agree that my point is factual.

nf.23.10.14 #11,460 to kshrgrl.23.10.14 #11,455