Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,432
- 58,458
- 3,565
For the youngest adults that seems trueDogs can replace kids roles in people's lives.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the youngest adults that seems trueDogs can replace kids roles in people's lives.
Easier and less expensive to take care of. Can't fault any young person for going that route. It's nobody's duty to have offspring.For the youngest adults that seems true
I dont know about 4-legged animals being cheaper to ownEasier and less expensive to take care of. Can't fault any young person for going that route. It's nobody's duty to have offspring.
Feeding it Costs less. Clothing? That alone is alot less expensive. Not even comparable. If one isn't making well over six figures it might just be a solid choice.I dont know about 4-legged animals being cheaper to own
Taking them to vet can be expensive
And I am noticing pet insurance advertised on national tv
When a dog gets 10 years old it has healthcare needs like a 70 year old human
Another meaningless nastygram from Ft. Angry.An idiotic talking point, of course.
What matters is the number of women denied abortions.
This is low IQ garbage.
it seems that abortion, contraception, drugs, reproduction in general have been reserved not for the people, but for the states.I disagree that individuals have no rights. What rights are you referring to?
What happens when the dog gets cancer?Feeding it Costs less. Clothing? That alone is alot less expensive. Not even comparable. If one isn't making well over six figures it might just be a solid choice.
Except for the point I made that you are too much of a crybaby to deal with. So we get the baby tantrum. Again.Another meaningless nastygram from Ft. Angry.![]()
Run along troll boy. go pump up your reaction score somewhere else.Except for the point I made that you are too much of a crybaby to deal with. So we get the baby tantrum. Again.
Oh look, another crybaby tantrum.Run along troll boy. go pump up your reaction score somewhere else.![]()
Won't happen. But I am a proponent of being able to keep your kids on your policy until 26.What happens when the dog gets cancer?
I can imagine some politician pushing to add 4-legged members of the family under 25 to everyones obamacare policy
True, but what it did was to force a much higher percentage of people to take a stand, one way or another on the topic, which helps root out the folks who were clandestine abortion supporters for ridicule (and possibly more).One could also note how overturning RvW did absolutely nothing to curtail abortions
You mean "choice supporters".True, but what it did was to force a much higher percentage of people to take a stand, one way or another on the topic, which helps root out the folks who were clandestine abortion supporters for ridicule (and possibly more).
No, I don’t. I’m not anti-choice, I’m anti-abortion. I believe the CHOICE occurred when the banana met the peach.You mean "choice supporters".
I shouldn't have to give basic English lessons to an old fart.
Yes you do. People wo are pro choice are not pro abortion. Get it through your head.No, I don’t. I’m not anti-choice, I’m anti-abortion. I believe the CHOICE occurred when the banana met the peach.
No. I am anti-abortion. The ONLY circumstance where I believe it’s even questionable is in the case of PROVABLE (and legally actionable) RAPE. Other than that I believe it should be a capital offense to knowingly attempt to terminate a pregnancy.Yes you do. People wo are pro choice are not pro abortion. Get it through your head.
But good to hear that you agree it should be legal. A right, even
Then don't get an abortion and shut the fuck up.No. I am anti-abortion.
Not at all. The CHOICE occurs when the impregnating act occurs. BOTH parties consent to an act that could create a child, therefore they are consenting to parenthood in such a case.But your lying. You're anti choice. Not the same thing
This weaselly, low IQ equivocation won't work for you.Not at all. The CHOICE occurs when the impregnating act occurs. BOTH parties consent to an act that could create a child, therefore they are consenting to parenthood in such a case.
That’s why my ONE and ONLY exception would be for a woman who did not consent to the act and has reported the act to the authorities in a timely manner… not six weeks later after peeing on a stick.
No. I just believe that only ONE choice should be allowed. Consent to Sex is Consent to Parenthood. You don’t get a do-over because your birth control didn’t work.You're anti choice