whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,260
- 6,106
- 245
kshrgrl.23.10.13 #11,397 you're OK with accidentally killing normal kids
I oppose killing of all kids, That includes by accident by behaving responsibly any place children or pregnant women are present?
Here is my OK’s or not OK’s please read and refer to them not what you make up out of nothing I’ve ever written.
I AGREE WITH SAINT ding that after fertilization a new distinct human being has come alive..
Don’t know what his argument is after that.
nf.23.10.13 #11,401
I oppose killing of all kids, That includes by accident by behaving responsibly any place children or pregnant women are present?
Here is my OK’s or not OK’s please read and refer to them not what you make up out of nothing I’ve ever written.
04620 dvng.22.08.10 #4,620 “you deny that after fertilization a new, genetically distinct human has come alive. Abortion is intended to kill that life.”
04621 bvvgl.22.08.10 #4,621 “Well yes, but it's more like involuntary unborn baby slaughter”
04622 nf.22.08.10 #4,622 My support for a woman to be able to choose to continue or end a pregnancy is based on my secular humanist respect for women as equals to men and no respect for what some Christians opine that sacred life begins at conception. I believe sacred life begins at viability and it should not be a matter that is to be determined by expecting politicians to vote on it. That is the most absurd idea I have ever heard.
04739 dvng.22.08.10 #4,739 “the only correct way to see it is abortion ends a human life.”
04761 nf.22.08.10 #4,761 Actually ding the scientifically correct way to say it, is abortion ends a not viable human life when the procedure is performed prior to 24 weeks after conception.”
you deny that after fertilization a new, genetically distinct human has come alive.
involuntary unborn baby slaughter
killing normal kids
I AGREE WITH SAINT ding that after fertilization a new distinct human being has come alive..
Don’t know what his argument is after that.
nf.23.10.13 #11,401