Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where women are denied the right to privacy, as r baby factory is concerned, in several states already by means of Trigger laws. Some States feel like they should own the women I guess.
www.dailysignal.com
And they can still do that. Many states will allow it up until then, and beyond. They might just have the inconvenience of a bus ride and an overnight motel room, which I’m sure PP and pro-abortion groups will fund.That is absurd since some women will not know they are pregnant and should allow for incest and rape.
I strongly dislike the Mandatory Motherhood ideology the republicans are.
I favor the 16-week line because most women who aborts do so at the 93% rate by week 16.
It concerned individual rights, both times.
.
women can still avoid having childrenWhere women are denied the right to privacy, as far as their baby factory is concerned, in several states already by means of Trigger laws. Some States feel like they should own the women I guess.
Psssft, the Neo-GOP and the Great Pussy Grab. Thanks Donnie.
Never trust the Neo-GOP, ladies. Better vote them out while you still can!
As proven today. The problem you folks have moving forward is time works against you. The limitations set by the states will be fully understood or changed. There will be no reason to take abortion back to the national stage. It will likely be decades before the Court changes enough to even consider trying to get a case to the Supreme Court. This is likely a dead issue within a year.
Or she can say no. Or she can limit her partners to those that are desirable as father to her children and that she and her partner are willing to make a commitment to raising them should their recreational activity result in the creation of a human child.The stupid bitch can protect herself and demand her partner does as well
Their problem was that there was never any constitutional basis to support Roe in the first place. It was invented law based upon the liberal biases of the majority of the court back then..
Thanks for the Dissenting Opinion ...
They should be careful when they are a Supreme Court Justices and try to avoid all the caterwauling and hyperbole.
It might have served them better if they had attempted to find some Constitutional or legal grounds for their dissent.
It's what happens when Justices think they are politicians ...
.
Doesn't look like you're right.If the SC says it is Constitutional then it is
Not sure who "you folks" are since I am against abortion...but that aside.
It will be a dead issue as far as the courts are concerned, not sure so much for the voters. The more states that pass more and more restrictive laws will keep it an issue for the voters.
Sooner than later a state will make it murder and go after doctors and mothers. It is only a matter of time.
The fourth amendment is not applicable to abortion."The right of the people to be secure in their persons"
I hope so. It is murder.
A baby would take 9 months in her baby factory. Ops, did I say her baby factory? Now I must say the State owned Baby Factory, inside of her.Why grab a pussy when you can fuck it and murder the baby?
Interstate only. Oklahoma could declare you can't leave the county you live in.
ACB is a member of a small radical Catholic sect and was completely unqualified to be a SC justice. Her church is currently under investigation for sexual abuse of women and it only has 1500 members. I don't think cult members make good court members.So ACB is a woman hating man? ROFLMFAO
.
I wonder how many people will move to a pro life state just to live in a pro life environment?May God prosper those who live for their children--even the inconvenient ones--forever. I'm so grateful the current Supreme Court Justices did the right thing by turning this issue over to the individual states. That doesn't necessarily save a lot of children, but states that support life will be the ones bringing about tomorrow's America. And states that trouble loving people by rubberstamping irresponsible practices such as killing little human biengs in their developmental stages, which will bring everybody down and kill off founder dna.
Then I assume you are contacting your elected state Reps to push for murder charges against the doctor and the mother...
Not likely. The states are limited by their constituents. They get what the people allow. As it should be and always should have been. Either way, this is a dead issue on the federal level moving forward.Not sure who "you folks" are since I am against abortion...but that aside.
It will be a dead issue as far as the courts are concerned, not sure so much for the voters. The more states that pass more and more restrictive laws will keep it an issue for the voters.
Sooner than later a state will make it murder and go after doctors and mothers. It is only a matter of time.
That would put search and seizure in a whole new context.The fourth amendment is not applicable to abortion.
It is unreasonable search and seizure.
What do you think the government's gonna do? Show up with a portable ultrasound machine to routinely enforce a woman's pregnancy? Your penchant for drama and overstatement is precisely what's wrong with discourse on this issue.
