What does the sentencing ruling say about trump's SC?

[22lcidw]

The four conservatives in Dotard's back pocket were prepared to use the "weak immunity claim" to protect their Dear Leader. That's a foreshadowing of what is to come.

The Progs in California that caused the Hiroshima like destruction are the same as the AG and District Attorneys and judges in New York.

 

[berg80]

The Progs in California that caused the Hiroshima like destruction

Liar.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The Stalinberg Struggle is REAL!!!!!!!
Really PATHETIC

 

[kyzr]

The four conservatives in Dotard's back pocket were prepared to use the "weak immunity claim" to protect their Dear Leader. That's a foreshadowing of what is to come.

The "foreshadowing" is that "Lawfare" will not be allowed to interfere in the political process.

I can't wait for Pam Bondi to indict Letitia and Bragg for "prosecutorial misconduct", or "election interference", and/or "violations of Trump's civil rights".

 

[WorldWatcher]

The "foreshadowing" is that "Lawfare" will not be allowed to interfere in the political process.

I can't wait for Pam Bondi to indict Letitia and Bragg for "prosecutorial misconduct", or "election interference", and/or "violations of Trump's civil rights".

I support this.

That would allow James and Bragg to present all the evidence AGAIN in the media as to Trump's crimes and make headlines for months showing Trump's criminal activities as part of showing that their actions were measured and appropriate in response to illegal activities.

So YES!!! Please do.

WW

 

[kyzr]

/—-/ There’s a catch. If Merchan reneges on his promise and sends Trump to jail, the USSC may step in after all.
“Nevertheless, the Supreme Court majority’s conclusion that the sentencing poses minimal burden on Trump’s presidential transition hinges on Merchan’s assurance that he was leaning toward a no-jail, no-probation sentence. If Merchan were to change his mind at this point and impose a term of incarceration, the High Court would regard it as a betrayal. Practically speaking, then, Merchan has no choice but to do what he indicated he would do.
ANDREW McCARTHY: Supreme Court allows Trump to be tainted as a felon. But there's a catch
ANDREW McCARTHY: Supreme Court allows Trump to be tainted as a felon. But there's a catch

True. But since Trump will not be there in person, but only by ZOOM Merchan's sentence really doesn't matter. There is NFW that Merchan could get Trump behind bars before the inauguration.

 

[Blaster]

The sentencing is not a big deal.

 

[WorldWatcher]

True. But since Trump will not be there in person, but only by ZOOM Merchan's sentence really doesn't matter. There is NFW that Merchan could get Trump behind bars before the inauguration.

Justice Merchan, in his order last weak, already said jail wasn't on the table.

WW

 

[kyzr]

I support this.
That would allow James and Bragg to present all the evidence AGAIN in the media as to Trump's crimes and make headlines for months showing Trump's criminal activities as part of showing that their actions were measured and appropriate in response to illegal activities.
So YES!!! Please do. WW

WE AGREE!! But this time the real judge will follow the real law, more like Turley explains it...instead of the legally tortured interpretation by Merchan...

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…

jonathanturley.org

 

[kyzr]

Justice Merchan, in his order last weak, already said jail wasn't on the table.

WW

True. But the issue was, what if Merchan changes his mind?

 

[WorldWatcher]

WE AGREE!! But this time the real judge will follow the real law, more like Turley explains it...instead of the legally tortured interpretation by Merchan...

Buzz Kill: The Trump Conviction Presents a Target-Rich Environment for Appeal

Below is my column in the Hill on the most compelling grounds for an appeal in the Trump case after his conviction on 34 counts in Manhattan. There has been considerable criticism of the defense te…

jonathanturley.org

Turley?



WW

 

[TNHarley]

The SC is biased! They are a trump supreme court! Democracy! Insurrection!
Fuckin idiots.

 

[WorldWatcher]

True. But the issue was, what if Merchan changes his mind?

Then there would be a Constitutional crisis if confinement were to go past 01/06/2025 at Noon.

Not gonna happen though.

Justice Merchan is to measured and responsible and skill a judge to create that situation.

WW

 

[kyzr]

Turley?

WW

Laugh all you want, my point being that the NYC version won't stand up on appeal, which means "Lawfare", which means Trump's rights were violated. Soros backed DAs are always sucking for shekels...running on "getting Trump".

Alvin Bragg’s intentions back in spotlight after Trump verdict - Washington Examiner

Critics accuse Alvin Bragg of targeting former President Donald Trump. Supporters say he was fair and played it down the middle.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Alvin Bragg’s intentions back in spotlight after Trump verdict​

Letitia James vows to continue targeting Trump after years in the courtroom: 'Trump derangement syndrome'

New York Attorney General Letitia James vowed to continue legally pursuing President-elect Donald Trump after his massive victory last week.

www.foxnews.com

Letitia James vows to continue targeting Trump after years in the courtroom: 'Trump derangement syndrome'​

 

[WorldWatcher]

Laugh all you want, my point being that the NYC version won't stand up on appeal, which means "Lawfare", which means Trump's rights were violated. Soros backed DAs are always sucking for shekels...

Alvin Bragg’s intentions back in spotlight after Trump verdict - Washington Examiner

Critics accuse Alvin Bragg of targeting former President Donald Trump. Supporters say he was fair and played it down the middle.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Alvin Bragg’s intentions back in spotlight after Trump verdict​

Letitia James vows to continue targeting Trump after years in the courtroom: 'Trump derangement syndrome'

New York Attorney General Letitia James vowed to continue legally pursuing President-elect Donald Trump after his massive victory last week.

www.foxnews.com

Letitia James vows to continue targeting Trump after years in the courtroom: 'Trump derangement syndrome'​

It's not a violation of right for prosecutors to go after criminals and hold them responsible under the law.

WW

 

[Harry Dresden]

As it turns out it was shoved up Dotard's and his attorney's asses. His lead counsel's rationale being so weak he could get a majority of radical conservatives to rule in his favor. That guy is going to be the next Deputy AG as a reward for representing trump............poorly.

who is dotard?....

 

[kyzr]

It's not a violation of right for prosecutors to go after criminals and hold them responsible under the law.

WW

True. But if prosecutors run on promising to "get Trump", and then the weak legal cases they bring get overturned on appeal, one can make a case for "deliberate malicious prosecution", and a violation of Trump's civil rights, plus election interference, plus whatever the DOJ wants to charge them with.
Even if the DOJ's "reverse Lawfare" charges are total bullshit, the point being that Letitia and Bragg will need to spend time and money defending themselves. "turnabout is fair play"

 

[WorldWatcher]

True. But if prosecutors run on promising to "get Trump", and then the weak legal cases they bring get overturned on appeal, one can make a case for "deliberate malicious prosecution", and a violation of Trump's civil rights, plus election interference, plus whatever the DOJ wants to charge them with.
Even if the DOJ's "reverse Lawfare" charges are total bullshit, the point being that Letitia and Bragg will need to spend time and money defending themselves. "turnabout is fair play"

Prosecutors say they are going to "get" criminal all the time, holding them resonsible for the law. BTW - I think such a "Get Trump" thing was a James thing. Bragg never did that.

Also, they were doing their jobs. "Time and Money" defending themselves? Ahhh - no. Not really. There were performing their official duties therefore the lawyer time and the lawyer money will be on the taxpayer dime.

WW

 

[kyzr]

Prosecutors say they are going to "get" criminals all the time, holding them responsible for the law. BTW - I think such a "Get Trump" thing was a James thing. Bragg never did that.
Also, they were doing their jobs. "Time and Money" defending themselves? Ahhh - no. Not really. There were performing their official duties therefore the lawyer time and the lawyer money will be on the taxpayer dime. WW

OK, so the NY taxpayers can pay to defend them. At least the will be sitting in court defending their bullshit/Lawfare cases.

 

[WorldWatcher]

OK, so the NY taxpayers can pay to defend them. At least the will be sitting in court defending their bullshit/Lawfare cases.

Why would they be sitting in court? It would never get to trail. LOL

Since New York Taxpayers are getting to tap into about $600,000,000 of Trump's dollars they can afford it.

WW