The Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision

[BackAgain]

Let’s just be honest:

Justice Alito only spoke the truth. There was never any valid judicial line of reasoning supporting the Roe v. Wade edict. Overruling that irrational and essentially dishonest decision was nothing but completely proper.

Plessy v. Ferguson was “settled law” for a longer period of time than was Roe. And just as “separate but equal” was a bullshit decision, so too the make-believe “Constitutional right to have an abortion” was bullshit, too. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas properly overruled Plessy. So too, Dobbs properly overruled Roe.

 

[BackAgain]

Justice Alito spoke brilliantly. Honesty is a great recipe for brilliance.

 

[Rogue AI]

The problem is there has been a concerted effort to confuse the idea of privileges and rights. Most people cannot differentiate between them. Privileges can be altered with a vote or ruling, this has become common. Then insidious parties attempt to apply alterations to our rights and most of the population thinks it's just fine.

 

[night_son]

The problem is there has been a concerted effort to confuse the idea of privileges and rights. Most people cannot differentiate between them. Privileges can be altered with a vote or ruling, this has become common. Then insidious parties attempt to apply alterations to our rights and most of the population thinks it's just fine.

Well you know as long as everyone can keep their cell phone powered up, functioning and welded to an ear they don't really care about much else. Take away their cell phones and buddy you'd get people to start caring, at least caring about something.

 

[SweetSue92]

Let’s just be honest:

Justice Alito only spoke the truth. There was never any valid judicial line of reasoning supporting the Roe v. Wade edict. Overruling that irrational and essentially dishonest decision was nothing but completely proper.

Plessy v. Ferguson was “settled law” for a longer period of time than was Roe. And just as “separate but equal” was a bullshit decision, so too the make-believe “Constitutional right to have an abortion” was bullshit, too. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas properly overruled Plessy. So too, Dobbs properly overruled Roe.

And people do not understand federalism, nor the 10th Amendment. Not shocking here in the Stupid Century

 

[schmidlap]

Authoritarian ideologues are giddy over the extremists on the Supreme Court legislating from the bench and abrogating long-established personal freedoms. Freedom-loving American are, understandably, losing respect for the institution as a result.

The radical shift to the right on everything from the Second Amendment and abortion, to the separation of church and state, is opposed by the People.

Poll: Confidence in Supreme Court collapses​

Just 33% agree with decision to overturn Roe v. Wade​

 

[Burgermeister]

Authoritarian ideologues are giddy over the extremists on the Supreme Court legislating from the bench and abrogating long-established personal freedoms. Freedom-loving American are, understandably, losing respect for the institution as a result.

The radical shift to the right on everything from the Second Amendment and abortion, to the separation of church and state, is opposed by the People.

Poll: Confidence in Supreme Court collapses​

Just 33% agree with decision to overturn Roe v. Wade​

LOL. They think putting the power back to the legislative branch is legislating from the bench, then bleat about personal freedoms while they cry about Second Amendment - an actual constitutional right. They are so confused.

 

[schmidlap]

They think putting the power back to the legislative branch is legislating from the bench

Allowing states to enslave people if their politicians decided they should be able to, despite the U.S. Constitution, is not an acceptable retrogression in freedom for the majority of Americans. The rampant statist authoritarianism is repugnant to most folks.

Majority of Americans disapprove of Supreme Court’s abortion ruling

Supreme Court Overturning Roe Met With 67% Disapproval Among Women

Public Opinion for Supreme Court Drops Below Biden Approval Rating​

 

[schmidlap]

Let’s just be honest:

Justice Alito only spoke the truth. There was never any valid judicial line of reasoning supporting the Roe v. Wade edict. Overruling that irrational and essentially dishonest decision was nothing but completely proper.

Plessy v. Ferguson was “settled law” for a longer period of time than was Roe. And just as “separate but equal” was a bullshit decision, so too the make-believe “Constitutional right to have an abortion” was bullshit, too. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas properly overruled Plessy. So too, Dobbs properly overruled Roe.

The abrogation of personal freedom in the striking down of Roe v Wade is a retrogression in human rights.

Adopting the authoritarian policies of an Iraq, a Nicaragua, or an El Salvador concerning abortion and abandoning those of advanced democracies is not a good thing, no matter how statist ideologues try to spin it.

 

[Burgermeister]

Allowing states to enslave people if their politicians decided they should be able to, despite the U.S. Constitution, is not an acceptable retrogression in freedom for the majority of Americans. The rampant statist authoritarianism is repugnant to most folks.

Unsurprisingly irrelevant statement.

 

[schmidlap]

Unsurprisingly irrelevant statement.

If you support statist authoritarianism, that is what you will claim, of course.

 

[BackAgain]

The abrogation of personal freedom in the striking down of Roe v Wade is a retrogression in human rights.

Adopting the authoritarian policies of an Iraq, a Nicaragua, or an El Salvador concerning abortion and abandoning those of advanced democracies is not a good thing, no matter how statist ideologues try to spin it.

Abrogation? How about the triumph of the right to life itself? Oh yeah. You keep forgetting that.

 

[schmidlap]

Abrogation? How about the triumph of the right to life itself? Oh yeah. You keep forgetting that.

If you need to pretend that adopting the authoritarian policies of an Iraq, a Nicaragua, or an El Salvador concerning abortion, and abandoning those of advanced democracies, is a good thing, that is what you will do.

 

[BackAgain]

If you need to pretend that adopting the authoritarian policies of an Iraq, a Nicaragua, or an El Salvador concerning abortion, and abandoning those of advanced democracies, is a good thing, that is what you will do.

If you need to pretend that the right to life itself is the subordinate right to “choice,” then not only are you illogical and stupid but you are also clearly a modern “liberal.”

Schmidhead, you are beyond help and beyond hope. Let’s see if you can ever be brought to your senses. Take a one question test:

“Without life itself, what other rights can you enjoy?”

 

[schmidlap]

If you need to pretend that the right to life itself is the subordinate right to “choice,” then not only are you illogical and stupid but you are also clearly a modern “liberal.”

Your insistence that control over wombs should be arrogated by your politicians and bureaucrats aligns you with Iraq, Nicaragua, and El Salvador.

I share the respect for personal liberty and other values of advanced democratic nations.

When the People surrender reproductive freedom to an authoritarian regime, that State then has the power to proscribe or order abortion.

The People must not surrender their liberty to the State.

 

[busybee01]

Let’s just be honest:

Justice Alito only spoke the truth. There was never any valid judicial line of reasoning supporting the Roe v. Wade edict. Overruling that irrational and essentially dishonest decision was nothing but completely proper.

Plessy v. Ferguson was “settled law” for a longer period of time than was Roe. And just as “separate but equal” was a bullshit decision, so too the make-believe “Constitutional right to have an abortion” was bullshit, too. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas properly overruled Plessy. So too, Dobbs properly overruled Roe.

Overturning Plessy v Ferguson expanded the rights of Americans or more specifically black Americans. Roe v Wade expanded the rights of women to make the decision rather than politicians on whether to have a baby. Dobbs improperly overrules Roe.

 

[busybee01]

Justice Alito spoke brilliantly. Honesty is a great recipe for brilliance.

He is not brilliant. He misquotes other court precedents. He relies on 18th and 19th century science. He out and out calls women who have abortion as murderers. That is clearly his personal belief. In addition, he ignores the 9th Amendment which states that rights do not have to be enumerated to be rights. Judicial review is not enumerated in the Constitution either.

 

[busybee01]

LOL. They think putting the power back to the legislative branch is legislating from the bench, then bleat about personal freedoms while they cry about Second Amendment - an actual constitutional right. They are so confused.

The second Amendment does not prohibit regulation of guns.

 

[busybee01]

LOL. They think putting the power back to the legislative branch is legislating from the bench, then bleat about personal freedoms while they cry about Second Amendment - an actual constitutional right. They are so confused.

Taking the rights of women to make the decision and giving it to politicians to decide is legislating from the bench. The 9th Amendment does not require that a right be enumerated to be valid.

 

[busybee01]

If you need to pretend that the right to life itself is the subordinate right to “choice,” then not only are you illogical and stupid but you are also clearly a modern “liberal.”

Schmidhead, you are beyond help and beyond hope. Let’s see if you can ever be brought to your senses. Take a one question test:

“Without life itself, what other rights can you enjoy?”

You are the big-government liberal. You believe the state should make the decision on abortion over the individual. You are a threat to this country. This is the question. When does it become a life?