reality check

[Siete]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

 

[owebo]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

 

[candycorn]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Stable and unbreakable at this point.

Maybe in 2020, the GOP will understand how to run a campaign. Didn't happen this time. Thank goodness because HRC was beatable. They just happened to pick the one person incapable of doing it.

 

[PurpleOwl]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Thank goodness because HRC was beatable.

no she wasn't.... that's why they let trump run

 

[owebo]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Stable and unbreakable at this point.

Maybe in 2020, the GOP will understand how to run a campaign. Didn't happen this time. Thank goodness because HRC was beatable. They just happened to pick the one person incapable of doing it.

I wonder if Trump will even win DC this time.......

 

[owebo]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Thank goodness because HRC was beatable.

no she wasn't.... that's why they let trump run

Trump was the only one that could beat her....and it looks like he will crush her handily....

 

[PurpleOwl]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

 

[007]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

 

[owebo]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

Yep...we love America....jump on the Trump train with us!!!!

 

[PurpleOwl]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

I think you might be in the wrong thread

 

[PurpleOwl]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

Yep...we love America....jump on the Trump train with us!!!!

you love white America maybe

 

[Siete]

I read where Donnie is begging voters to change their early ballot from Clinton to him ..

grovel baby ..

 

[007]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

I think you might be in the wrong thread

I think you've taken one too many hits off the bong tonight.

 

[owebo]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

Yep...we love America....jump on the Trump train with us!!!!

you love white America maybe

We don't see color in America....hopefully you can get over your racism before you jump on the train!

 

[PurpleOwl]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

I think you might be in the wrong thread

I think you've taken one too many hits off the bong tonight.

how does your first post relate to the OP in any way?

 

[PurpleOwl]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

Yep...we love America....jump on the Trump train with us!!!!

you love white America maybe

We don't see color in America....

since when?

 

[007]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

I think you might be in the wrong thread

I think you've taken one too many hits off the bong tonight.

how does your first post relate to the OP in any way?

So you have taken one too many hits...

 

[owebo]

I read where Donnie is begging voters to change their early ballot from Clinton to him ..

grovel baby ..

It actually spiked on Google.....its ******* hilarious how hard people are abandoning your hitlery....

 

[owebo]

How sad....I am actually starting to feel bad for you liberals....

is every day opposite day in Trumpland?

Yep...we love America....jump on the Trump train with us!!!!

you love white America maybe

We don't see color in America....

since when?

Since we freed your slaves....

 

[PurpleOwl]

But the reality is that Clinton's chances of winning 270 electoral votes have hardly changed from last week. While Democrats' agitation is palpable, it's driven more by anger than panic at what they see as unprecedented and appalling meddling by outside forces in the election.

FiveThirtyEight's election forecast still gives Clinton a 71 percent chance of winning, while the New York Times' Upshot model gives her an 88 percent chance, and Princeton University's model pegs her likelihood at 97 percent.


Analysis: Reality Check Shows Clinton's Path to 270 Is Stable

Doesn't it suck when people start calling you leftards out on your cheating and corruption?

Poor progs...

I think you might be in the wrong thread

I think you've taken one too many hits off the bong tonight.

how does your first post relate to the OP in any way?

So you have taken one too many hits...

I thought libertarians liked marijuana?