Post the Experiment

It would be a lot easier for the skeptical side to post up the dozens of fake/ or faulty video experiments that serve only as propaganda for CAGW. Eg Mythbusters or the ludicrously fake Gore/Bye fiasco.
nice idea Ian. I'll see if I can find them in the other threads and post them.
 
So, jc, you believe the Mythbusters video is fraudulent? Given the confirmation the Lawrence Berkely in situ experiments have provided, why would fraud be necessary?
 
Last edited:
So, jc, you believe the Mythbusters video is fraudulent? Given the confirmation the Lawrence Berkely in situ experiments have provided, why would fraud be necessary?


The fraud (eg. 200 times atmospheric CO2) is necessary to get a visual response. A 120 ppm change would not make a noticeable change.
 
The fraud would be claiming the experiment used 7% CO2.

Deniers, why do you all keep pushing that fraud?

Why do clueless morons post drivel that they can not support with facts? The Spectrophotometer clearly showed they were placing 7.23% of total atmosphere into the boxes. That is 200 times current atmospheric levels and would represent 72,300ppm. Any fool could throw up a light and aim it at those boxes and get warming, and they did.
 
The narrative clearly said they were reproducing atmospheric conditions and never said "this is a shot of the gauge is a measure of the CO2 level in the boxes. There were other shots that showed a level of zero. Perhaps that was what was in the boxes. Your view would be termed "cherry picking.

You clueless moron.
 
Last edited:
The narrative clearly said they were reproducing atmospheric conditions and never said "this is a shot of the gauge is a measure of the CO2 level in the boxes. There were other shots that showed a level of zero. Perhaps that was what was in the boxes. Your view would be termed "cherry picking.

You clueless moron.

LOL.. Even their web site says 7% of atmosphere.... Epic FAIL...
 
The narrative clearly said they were reproducing atmospheric conditions and never said "this is a shot of the gauge is a measure of the CO2 level in the boxes. There were other shots that showed a level of zero. Perhaps that was what was in the boxes. Your view would be termed "cherry picking.

You clueless moron.

LOL.. Even their web site says 7% of atmosphere.... Epic FAIL...

Let's see a link
 
someone should ask M Gupta on facebook about the mythbusters experiment.
 
Crick and Mantooth, you're the ones who don't believe the 7%, go ask M. Gupta on Facebook and post back here.
 
another week and still no experiment. The new forum tact by the warmers is create new threads with nothing in them except to explain their denials. Sweet.
 
The one and only tactic of this particular denier is to simply continue to lie.
 
The one and only tactic of this particular denier is to simply continue to lie.
yep, prove that you and yours lie. Like the lack of an experiment. yessiree bob.
 
jc, stop spamming. That's against the board rules.

And while lying is not against board rules, you should stop doing that as well, just out of decency.
 
jc, stop spamming. That's against the board rules.

And while lying is not against board rules, you should stop doing that as well, just out of decency.

Mamfool still hasn't posted the experiment and the relevant data and methods... Where is the experiment? Yet you call other people stupid when it is you that is stupid and a fool...
 

Forum List

Back
Top