jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 151,027
- 34,844
- 2,180
What about it?Oooops!
What about the earth as itself 'reecent] history 'model.'
Ooops.
`
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What about it?Oooops!
What about the earth as itself 'reecent] history 'model.'
Ooops.
`
Still waiting for evidencejc456 is just another one line Ding minus a few irrelevant smoke-and-mirror graphs.
`
And when it cooled, CO2 levels dropped, didn't they. Why don't you see if you can find a span of time over which temperature and CO2 moved in opposite directions. That'd really make your name.The Last Time Earth had >500 ppm of Atmospheric CO2...
...It cooled.![]()
After it cooled yes. Lagging temperature by 800 to 1000 years. The mechanism is the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature.And when it cooled, CO2 levels dropped, didn't they. Why don't you see if you can find a span of time over which temperature and CO2 moved in opposite directions. That'd really make your name.
Sure, that would be after the industrial revolution when atmospheric CO2 levels became a function of CO2 emissions. They haven't really moved in opposite directions because the planet was still warming up naturally but the correlation was broken. Prior to that atmospheric CO2 was a function of temperature, lagging temperature by 800 to 1000 years.Why don't you see if you can find a span of time over which temperature and CO2 moved in opposite directions.
Isn’t that a cycle? HahahaAnd when it cooled, CO2 levels dropped, didn't they. Why don't you see if you can find a span of time over which temperature and CO2 moved in opposite directions. That'd really make your name.
I have no interest in that. I'm only interested in the truth.That'd really make your name.
No shit?After it cooled yes. Lagging temperature by 800 to 1000 years. The mechanism is the solubility of CO2 in water versus temperature.
The data show two different correlations between CO2 and temperature. You want to pretend that one of them doesn't really exist.Why you would think CO2 lagging temperature by 800 to 1000 years is a sign of the atmosphere controlling the climate is beyond me.
The solubility of CO2 in water is inversely proportional to temperature. That was understood a lo-o-o-o-o-ng time ago.This is clearly a sign of the ocean controlling climate and atmospheric CO2 levels dropping in response to the climate change because the ocean was able to absorb more CO2 at lower temperatures.
It's PRECISELY as if you have no ability to think, period.It's almost as if you have no ability to think about this things outside of your unfounded dogmatic beliefs.
Did you actually think I was serious?I have no interest in that. I'm only interested in the truth.
You are only interested in politics.
If you can't type a coherent paragraph explaining your beliefs then I see no reason to respond to your criticism of my beliefs. I'll just keep repeating what I believe.No shit?
The data show two different correlations between CO2 and temperature. You want to pretend that one of them doesn't really exist.
The solubility of CO2 in water is inversely proportional to temperature. That was understood a lo-o-o-o-o-ng time ago.
It's PRECISELY as if you have no ability to think, period.
I think you are fraudulent.Did you actually think I was serious?
Let's see the graph you've been using for these points. Let's see if it adds anything to the conversation.
Let's see the graph you've been using for these points. Let's see if it adds anything to the conversation.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and temperatures have fluctuated over the last 50 million years, with periods of high CO2 levels and high temperatures, and periods of lower CO2 levels and lower temperatures:
Temperature and CO2 both rose. What's wrong with you?