Seems like in the last few mass shootings, armed police officers were shot and killed.
So tell me again, if you arm more people, fewer people will die?
Or is it, more armed police and fewer people will die?
To me, it's seems obvious that if there were fewer guns, fewer people would be shot.
But Republican logic says that's not true. Course, their idea of "safe" is arm everyone in a crowded and dark theater. Now that's safety.
Only morons think that. Smart people know reality.
The reality is, only some people should be armed, and it's important that a potential attacker not know who they are.
Another reality is, the simple mantra that "fewer guns means fewer people get shot" falls upon simple examination. Since there are so many guns in existence, the only way to fewer is to forcibly remove them. When you forcibly remove guns, guess who will hold onto them and who will give them up? There are two categories of people, the law abiding and the law breaking.