PA law makers move to end illegal no-excuse mail in voting which poisoned 2020 election

That was not a very clever deflection from the question.

How about requiring states like Georgia to abide by Florida's VOTE BY MAIL RULES? You got a problem with that bro?
How about letting the each State make their own election laws, like it says in the Constitution my brother. Feel free to advocate changing the Constitution .....
 
That was not a very clever deflection from the question.

How about requiring states like Georgia to abide by Florida's VOTE BY MAIL RULES? You got a problem with that bro?
How about letting the each State make their own election laws, like it says in the Constitution my brother. Feel free to advocate changing the Constitution .....

So, once again instead of answering an innocuous question, you deflect.

JWK
 
So, once again instead of answering an innocuous question, you deflect.

JWK
Right I live in Texas and I don't care how the legislature in Fla or Ga. decide who can vote by mail or how they vote by mail.
 
Right I live in Texas and I don't care how the legislature in Fla or Ga. decide who can vote by mail or how they vote by mail.

1643650682869.png


And yet another deflection to avoid the question.
 
For those interested in discussing the rule of law as opposed to engaging in a political partisan food fight, see Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down Mail-In Voting Law As Unconstitutional,

.
JANUARY 31, 2022,

“With Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices elected on a partisan ticket and Democrats currently holding a 5-2 majority on the state’s high court, Democrats are predicting the no-excuse mail-in voting law will be upheld. That forecast seems accurate given the hyper-partisan approach to legal analysis seen since the 2020 election. It’s unfortunate because yesterday’s opinion in McLinko v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania reached the proper conclusion as a matter of constitutional analysis and controlling precedent”.

Aside from the author providing historical documentation confirming why no-excuse mail-in voting violates Article VII, Section 14 of Pennsylvania’s Constitution, the indication that a political partisan court may ignore the rule of law and inject its feelings as the rule of law is very scary indeed.

With that in mind, and to determine the true meaning of Article VII, Section 14 of PA’s Constitution, the Judge, in striking down no-excuse mail in ballots as being unconstitutional in his WRITTEN OPINION, takes the time to fully document the entire legislative history with regard to Article VII, Section 14.

If you follow the above link and scroll down to page 21, and read forward, it seems crystal clear the very purpose of the constitutional provision [Article VII, Section 14] is to explicitly limit the use of mail-in absentee ballot as provided in the section.

Incidentally, the historical documentation is very, very interesting, especially how absentee voting was introduced into the Pennsylvania Constitution and why!

JWK

What makes a Supreme Court opinion legitimate is when it is in harmony with the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent which gives context to its text.
 

PA Supreme Court set to hear unconstitutional no-excuse mail-in voting case​


See Mail-in voting: Pennsylvania Supreme Court will hear arguments (wtae.com)

Feb 2, 2022


"HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) —
Pennsylvania’s highest court said Wednesday that it will hear arguments on the constitutionality of Pennsylvania’s expansive 2-year-old mail-in voting law, whose fate is in doubt after a lower court ruled the law violates the state constitution.


The state Supreme Court said it will hear oral arguments at its March 8 session in Harrisburg. Written briefs are due before then."


The fact is, the Pennsylvania Legislature had no authority to do what it did, nor does PA’s Supreme Court have the authority to make the constitution mean what it believes it should mean.


The PA Constitution is very clear on how the Constitution may be amended, CLICK HERE



The qualified electors of the Commonwealth have the final say on agreeing or rejecting proposed amendments to their Constitution.



As Justice Hugo L. Black emphatically stated: “The public welfare demands that constitutional cases must be decided according to the terms of the Constitution itself, and not according to judges’ views of fairness, reasonableness, or justice.” ___ ( U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1886 - 1971) Source: Lecture, Columbia University, 1968


JWK

The whole aim of construction, as applied to a provision of the Constitution, is to discover the meaning, to ascertain and give effect to the intent of its framers and the people who adopted it.
_____HOME BLDG. & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. BLAISDELL, 290 U.S. 398 (1934)
 
In the mean time, there have been no instances of people illegally voting in any large numbers. We did have that trump ass hole trying to mooch votes from the Secretary of State in Georgia which is both stupid and illegal. This was after the votes being counted. Seems like a huge number of republicans don't seem to give a damn either.
 
In the mean time, there have been no instances of people illegally voting in any large numbers.

That is not true. Over a million illegal no-excuse mail-in ballots were counted in PA's last election.

JWK
 

Forum List

Back
Top