Didn't say it was but it does showcase the dubious lengths Trump attempted to overturn an election he had no proof of, according to the courts.
No, because the GOP did not attempt to criminalize disagreement.
So? He doesn’t control every word that comes out of their mouths.
Al Gore is grateful for that.
I don’t. I just said I have a problem with it.
Same for Al Gore.
What do you think Gore did in regards to the election that was dubious?
Nor indictments for actual crimes. The indictments are fake, the fakery motivated by politics.
He did not control them.
Gore more so than others.
No way to know, but I thank you for saying “would have” instead of “would of,” which is like nails on a chalkboard to me.
Desperately tried to overturn the results after he conceded.
That isn't dubious.
I am not interested in debating your conspiracies.
I’ve read them carefully multiple times, and none of them list the criminal statute Trump supposedly violated nor what specific actions violated it.
In light of what I said above, which do you think is?
Tried to sue his way to the White House when the vote counts went against him. Asked for rules to be changed in his favor
We all believe what we want. Progs started that a long time before Deplorables. It would help if the Prog dominated media/entertainment wing of the power elite took their foot of the endless propaganda spiels.
Jesus, Faun!To pepper your post with some perspective -- you also b'lieve the assailant who broke into the Pelosi home and assaulted Paul Pelosi with a hammer was really Paul Pelosi's lover.
So you're not exactly playing with a full deck, if ya know what I mean.
Nah, Frannie doesn't believe any of that nonsense. This is how he gets attention.To pepper your post with some perspective -- you also b'lieve the assailant who broke into the Pelosi home and assaulted Paul Pelosi with a hammer was really Paul Pelosi's lover.
So you're not exactly playing with a full deck, if ya know what I mean.
apnews.com
Links please.
Thanks for cutting and pasting something I’ve already read. Just saying “its all illegal” wont stand up.A small portion of the indictments are pasted below.
I am not sure how you could miss this after reading it carefully multiple times...?
Read the indictment
Read the indictment against Donald Trump in the 2020 Election investigation
The Defendant and co-conspirators used knowingly false claims of election fraud to get state legislators and election officials to subvert the legitimate election results and change electoral votes for the Defendant's opponent, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., to electoral votes for the Defendant. That is, on the pretext of baseless fraud claims, the Defendant pushed officials in certain states to ignore the popular vote; disenfranchise millions of voters; dismiss legitimate electors; and ultimately, cause the ascertainment of and voting by illegitimate electors in favor of the Defendant.
The Defendant and co-conspirators organized fraudulent slates of electors in seven targeted states (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin), attempting to mimic the procedures that the legitimate electors were supposed to follow under the Constitution and other federal and state laws. This included causing the fraudulent electors to meet on the day appointed by federal law on which legitimate electors were to gather and cast their votes; cast fraudulent votes for the Defendant; and sign certificates falsely representing that they were legitimate clectors. Some fraudulent electors were tricked into participating based on the understanding that their votes would be used only if the Defendant succeeded in outcome-determinative lawsuits within their state, which the Defendant never did. The Defendant and co-conspirators then caused these fraudulent electors to transmit their false certificates to the....
Vice President and other government officials to be counted at the certification proceeding on January 6.
The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to use the power and authority of the Justice Department to conduct sham election crime investigations and to send a letter to the targeted states that falsely claimed that the Justice Department had identified significant concerns that may have impacted the election outcome; that sought to advance the Defendant's fraudulent elector plan by using the Justice Department's authority to falsely present the fraudulent electors as a valid alternative to the legitimate electors; and that urged, on behalf of the Justice Department, the targeted states legislatures to convene to create the opportunity to choose the fraudulent electors over the legitimate electors.
The Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to enlist the Vice President to use his ceremonial role at the January 6 certification proceeding to fraudulently alter the election results. First, using knowingly false claims of election fraud, the Defendant and co-conspirators attempted to convince the Vice President to use the Defendant's fraudulent electors, reject legitimate electoral votes, or send legitimate electoral votes to state legislatures for review rather than counting them. When that failed, on the morning of January 6, the Defendant and co-conspirators repeated knowingly false claims of election fraud to gathered supporters, falsely told them that the Vice President had the authority to and might alter the election results, and directed them to the Capitol to obstruct the certification proceeding and exert pressure on the Vice President to take the fraudulent actions he had previously refused.
After it became public on the afternoon of January 6 that the Vice President would not fraudulently alter the election results, a large and angry crowd- including many individuals whom the Defendant had deceived into believing the Vice President could and might change the election results- violently attacked the Capitol and halted the proceeding. As violence ensued, the Defendant and co-conspirators exploited the disruption by redoubling efforts to levy false claims of election fraud and convince Members of Congress to further delay the certification based on those claims.
All of the above is illegal. You really missed it?
See above.
Research it yourself, it’s old news.
I am starting to think you are a disengenius poster.
The four statutes are described here
If I’m a disingenuous poster, you are more than welcome not to read my post. It seems like you want to talk about everything in the world except name in the actions by Trump that violated specific criminal statues.
Just naming the statues isn’t enough. What part of the statute did what action of Trump violate?
