No-excuse mail-in voting makes election fraud as easy as pie and invites one-party rule

[my2¢]

It has been my experience that mail-in voting has proven to be more reliable.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Silly statement below. No evidence of systemic fraud.

No-excuse mail-in voting makes election fraud as easy as pie and invites one-party rule

 

[johnwk]

Silly statement below. No evidence of systemic fraud.

No-excuse mail-in voting makes election fraud as easy as pie and invites one-party rule

I'm still waiting for you to explain how a mail-in ballot, when counted, is scrutinized to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.

With in-person voting, and the use of appropriate ID before one is allowed into the voting booth, there is an extremely high certainty that the one voting in the booth and checking the choices on the ballot, is the legitimate voter making such choices.

See: MAIL-IN VOTING IN 2020 INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT

Under "KEY FINDINGS" we learn:

Integrity attacks on voter registration data and systems represent a comparatively higher risk in a mail-in voting environment when compared to an in-person voting environment. This is because the voter is not present at the time of casting the ballot and cannot help to answer questions regarding their eligibility or identity verification.

So, tell us, fountain of all knowledge, how is a mail-in ballot, when counted, scrutinized to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No one has to explain anything to the goof balls.

They have to show there is a verifiable problem, which they can't.