bianco
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #81
False.
It is not "most certain" (it is not "certain" at all, in fact) and it is far from a matter of "should." Once again, you offer a complete lack of a coherent or rational "argument."
I could make a better argument against the death penalty than the trite amateur hour clap trap you have posted, and I am not even firmly opposed to or committed to the death penalty. Unlike you, my position allows for exceptions. Your rigid thinking is simply shallow.
True.
The Innocence Project - Home
Government Misconduct
Some wrongful convictions are caused by honest mistakes. But in far too many cases, the very people who are responsible for ensuring truth and justice law enforcement officials and prosecutors lose sight of these obligations and instead focus solely on securing convictions.
The cases of wrongful convictions uncovered by DNA testing are filled with evidence of negligence, fraud or misconduct by prosecutors or police departments.
Unreliable or Improper Forensic Science
Since the late 1980s, DNA analysis has helped identify the guilty and exonerate the innocent nationwide. While DNA testing was developed through extensive scientific research at top academic centers, many other forensic techniques such as hair microscopy, bite mark comparisons, firearm tool mark analysis and shoe print comparisons have never been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation. Meanwhile, forensics techniques that have been properly validated such as serology, commonly known as blood typing are sometimes improperly conducted or inaccurately conveyed in trial testimony.
In some cases, forensic analysts have fabricated results or engaged in other misconduct.
Poor blanco can't fathom that the fact that human affairs are imperfect does not translate into the proposition that the death penalty must be abolished.
The fact that human affairs are imperfect is the best reason why the death penalty must be abolished...leaving aside the fraud, misconduct and fabrications etc in the justice system.