McConnell Wants the Filibuster Nuked

It meant he was suspected of murdering two people.
Sure, he was suspected, but there's no murder on his legal record. The standard is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty because we suspect you're guilty.
 
Sure, he was suspected, but there's no murder on his legal record. The standard is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty because we suspect you're guilty.
That's correct, like Clinton and Trump, he was found not guilty for the charge of which he was accused. Still, much of the evidence points to his guilt and most people think he committed the crime but got away with it.
 
That's correct, like Clinton and Trump, he was found not guilty for the charge of which he was accused. Still, much of the evidence points to his guilt and most people think he committed the crime but got away with it.
What crime? Cite the specific crime they charged Trump with.
 
Except Slick was charged with actual crimes, unlike Trump

Slick was fined $750,000 and disbarred for his crimes.
Nutcase, soliciting a foreign national to provide a service to one's campaign is a crime. Like Clinton, Trump was charged with that in an article of impeachment.

Clinton was not disbarred and he was fined $25,000, not $750,000. :cuckoo:
 
What crime? Cite the specific crime they charged Trump with.
They impeached him for soliciting a foreign national to help him with his re-election campaign.

Seriously, dumbfuck, I've already educated you on this subject. How many more lessons do you need?

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Nutcase, soliciting a foreign national to provide a service to one's campaign is a crime. Like Clinton, Trump was charged with that in an article of impeachment.

Clinton was not disbarred and he was fined $25,000, not $750,000. :cuckoo:
List the statute that was in the articles of impeachment Trump supposedly violated.

Actually, it was a $90,000 fine and Slick had to give Jones $850,000.


...and he was disbarred.

 
They impeached him for soliciting a foreign national to help him with his re-election campaign.

Seriously, dumbfuck, I've already educated you on this subject. How many more lessons do you need?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Statute? Do you have the crime he was charged with?
 
List the statute that was in the articles of impeachment Trump supposedly violated.

Actually, it was a $90,000 fine and Slick had to give Jones $850,000.


...and he was disbarred.

Dumbfuck, there were no statutes listed in Clinton's articles of impeachment either. Like Trump, just a description of the crime.

If that was your idea of winning this debate, in order to claim Clinton was charged with a crime but Trump wasn't, that just blew up in your face again.

rotfl-gif.288736



And again, no, he wasn't disbarred. You're beyond brain-dead, dumbfuck. :cuckoo:

Clinton's license to practice law in Arkansas was suspended for 5 years. Then the U.S. Supreme Court suspended him and gave him 40 days to contest being disbarred but he opted to resign instead and the SCOTUS accepted his resignation in lieu of disbarring him.

This is all old news. How'd you get to be sooo fucked in the head to not know any of this??
 
List the statute that was in the articles of impeachment Trump supposedly violated.

Actually, it was a $90,000 fine and Slick had to give Jones $850,000.


...and he was disbarred.

Oops, missed one ... The $850,000 was a settlement with Jones and not in regard to his impeachment. Yet another fail for you. Hopefully, you're accustomed to failing by now.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 

Forum List

Back
Top