Like you?
Yes. You have.
Keep that in mind every time you do it.
Like the shit you think you’re being slick and pulling off?
You certainly aren’t.
Stop whining. You can peddle it, but object to taking it. Hypocrisy is strong in you.
Holy crap. You whine like a real little *****. You whine long time. But you’re still just a hypocrite.
Apply that advice liberally to yourself.
Try writing complete English sentences.
Bullshit. Lying doesn’t help you. What you wrote remains posted. Heck, I even quoted it.
No,you *****. I’m not a moderator. And unlike you I haven’t given directions.
What, you no know how to ask questions? Yes. You’ve been trying to engage in a pissing contest. Don’t like it? Good. Then don’t do it yourself.
Huh?
I’ve noticed that from your posts.
You’re just another fool then
No. I see you doing something and I call you on it. That’s how it works.
So what. Run away. I don’t care.
I don’t think I’m superior. I just think you’re full of shit. Of course, in fairness? I am almost certainly better than you. But, tough luck on you.
That’s not a fact. It’s all but completely established. You are a pant load.
I know you went on and on for a few more paragraphs, but you’re too boring to chat with at this point.
If you ever wish to man up and have an actual discussion, I’ll deign to help you out. But you’re first going to have to practice what you verbosely preach. Here’s one last parting gift.
It helps if you at least try to post on topic. The topic is the Soros funding of Bragg which has resulted in this disgraceful prosecutorial abuse by Bragg against Trump.
My, what a lofty perch you occupy. "man up' he says. Just listen to you!
Any moron can sling mud, and you have slung a lot of it.
As for 'discussion', I've got plenty of it on this forum, take a look around.
and when I do, then you cop out with TLDR. The truth is, you're lazy and you have an overinflated opinion of yourself.
You actually think posturing/dehumanizing/patronizing, ad nauseum, makes you a good debater.
No, it makes you small.
As for soros, I doubt Bragg is going to dignify the implication of that accusation, it's beneath him. By that measure, it's a such a weak position i don't even see the point of discussing it. Soros, like many super rich folks who donate to both dems and repubs, are vulture capitalists, so what else is new? But to impugn someone's integrity to suggest they are beholden to one of their donors is a weak argument, unless you have something beyond the mere fact that is real evidence. Everytime I hear someone from the right mention Bragg, they don't just mention his name, they preface with 'radical liberal soros funded DA Bragg', this kind of pettiness is so common with Trump, and his followers and defenders.
