The point of Bill Clinton's affair was not that Bill Clinton had an affair. Sadly that is very common, so much so that when we had a president who was squeaky clean in that regard, it was seen as unusual.
What put the right in an uproar was that Bill Clinton had taken advantage of a very young intern, literally ejaculated into her mouth, when he was president of the United States. This at a time when the Feminist movement and the Democrats who supported it was in constant moral outrage over the things like a boss complimenting his secretary on her appearance or a manager asking an assistant manager on a date. Yet they loved Bill Clinton and never criticized him. They ridiculed anyone who did.
The Democrat's answer was "but look how well the economy is doing!" and they had a very good point. We could argue about how, but the economy was strong under the Clinton presidency, and we don't know if it would have been if Bush the Elder had gotten a second term.
So, the Democrats lost any firm ground from which to launch an attack based on "your guy doesn't follow your morals!"
What has Trump done for the religious commmunity? How about recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel by moving the U.S. embassy there? Something previous presidents of both parties had promised, but on which Trump delivered.
He made it possible for states to restrict abortion.
He opposes the movement to let males in women and girls' sports, locker rooms and bathrooms.
I'm not positive, but I imagine he opposes giving hormones and surgeries to underage children in an attempt to change or confirm or whatever the lastest phrase is, their gender.
Would I rather he be a very moral man in his private life? Sure. I'd wish that of any man, including Joe and Hunter Biden. But given how few men can truly be called moral, I'll take the immoral one who puts America first.