First they complained about the makeup of the commission.........

Awesome, that is the best and most thoughtful answer you have ever given
Good job.

Now, this ^^^^^. is you spinning the words and accusing me of spinning, when in FACT I quoted trump word for word.
You ^^^^^ are doing the typical, this is what he meant to say.
Yes you quoted Trump’s words but tried to tell us he meant the opposite. You’re getting pretty desperate.
 
Yes you quoted Trump’s words but tried to tell us he meant the opposite. You’re getting pretty desperate.
I NEVER tried to tell you what trump meant.
That's obviously your job.
I told you what trump said, Im not repeating it again, it won't change.
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
Someone’s not getting through, and they know it….lol
 
187 minutes he sat on his ass watching FNC while these MAGATS rooted in our nation's Capitol Building and he never lifted a finger to send them any kind of message to disperse.

"Peacefully and patriotically"
WINK, WINK

He knew he was inciting violence.
And you know it too.
Just stop apologizing for this idiot and admit it.
You don't care!
Oh God you and Winnie have become mind readers!:cuckoo:
 
I NEVER tried to tell you what trump meant.
That's obviously your job.
I told you what trump said, Im not repeating it again, it won't change.
You won’t post his exact words again because I outed you for lying and spinning like a top.
 
Democrats told police to stand down for an entire summer of 2020 while rioters destroyed businesses of hard-working citizens. Fuck you.
Nice (but disingenuous) bait and switch distraction techniques you are using here.
Childish.
As soon as anyone starts talking about DJ Trump's
Oh God you and Winnie have become mind readers!:cuckoo:
It is part of the factual, indisputable, historic record now.
What exactly (specifically) is it you are trying to argue with now?
You DO know that arguing with FACTS that are self-evident and indisputable is as foolish as pissing into the wind don't you?
 
Nice (but disingenuous) bait and switch distraction techniques you are using here.
Childish.
As soon as anyone starts talking about DJ Trump's

It sis part of the factual, indisputable, historic record now.
What exactly (specifically) is it you are trying to argue with now?
You DO know that arguing with FACTS that are self-evident and indisputable is as foolish as pissing into the wind don't you?
Saying that you know what Trump was thinking is not presenting facts. Trump said he knew they would be peaceful. You got nothing.
 
You won’t post his exact words again because I outed you for lying and spinning like a top.
You truly are a fucking idiot
It’s you doing the spinning
It’s what most RWI’s excel at.
Which is blame others for your own failures
 
Saying that you know what Trump was thinking is not presenting facts. Trump said he knew they would be peaceful. You got nothing.
"Trump said" are two of the most automatically disqualifying words you can use in any argument trying to defend this mutant train-wreck of an amoral, grifting, toddler-turd, twice-impeached failure of an ex POTUS.

If "Trump said" it.....then it is most likely a LIE!

Again, the EVIDENCE proves it.

 
"Trump said" are two of the most automatically disqualifying words you can use in any argument trying to defend this mutant train-wreck of an amoral, grifting, toddler-turd, twice-impeached failure of an ex POTUS.

If "Trump said" it.....then it is most likely a LIE!

Again, the EVIDENCE proves it.

Trump said: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,"
Now, you and the bleating lefty sheeple are trying to tell US that statement is somehow tantamount to a call for violence. You guys should be ashamed of your lies but, I fear, you have no shame at all.
 
"Trump said" are two of the most automatically disqualifying words you can use in any argument trying to defend this mutant train-wreck of an amoral, grifting, toddler-turd, twice-impeached failure of an ex POTUS.

If "Trump said" it.....then it is most likely a LIE!

Again, the EVIDENCE proves it.

Not even the commenters on the article in your link believe that shit: "This is laughable. Imagine how politically corrupt you must be to believe that Trump lied that often, let alone publish it. The corruption by the establishment bureaucrats who relentlessly attack Trump is the biggest threat to the planet. On the big issues, Trump had a much better record than the American socialists and the globalists. He embarrassed them, and they hated him for that. "
 
Not even the commenters on the article in your link believe that shit: "This is laughable. Imagine how politically corrupt you must be to believe that Trump lied that often, let alone publish it. The corruption by the establishment bureaucrats who relentlessly attack Trump is the biggest threat to the planet. On the big issues, Trump had a much better record than the American socialists and the globalists. He embarrassed them, and they hated him for that. "


 
Trump said: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard,"
Now, you and the bleating lefty sheeple are trying to tell US that statement is somehow tantamount to a call for violence. You guys should be ashamed of your lies but, I fear, you have no shame at all.
Oh
Ok.
So what you are actually saying is that Mr. Trump is blameless.
The blame lies solely on the type of inbred gaggle of red-capped MAGAT mutants who are inclined to follow him.
Now THAT makes sense!
These idiots just misunderstood him right?
He didn't ACTUALLY MEAN to give them the impression that the election was illigitimate and "stolen" and that Mike Pence was "a traitor" and that the only way they were going to be able to "take back their country" was to March to The Capitol and "Fight like hell!"
I get it now.
The guy who "says what he means and means what he says" didn't really MEAN what he said.
Right?
His cultist worshippers (being dumber than a box of doorknobs) just misunderstood him and took it all too far.

And then of course, once he got back to The West Wing he was so paralyzed with shock and disgust watching these low-life miscreants desecrate our nation's Capitol in his name on national TV he was unable to act decisively and effectively for a full 187 minutes.

Now it all makes sense.
He's innocent!

No wonder he's trying to throw them all under the bus and distance himself from this incursion and attempted coup.

 
Oh
Ok.
So what you are actually saying is that Mr. Trump is blameless.
The blame lies solely on the type of inbred gaggle of red-capped MAGAT mutants who are inclined to follow him.
Now THAT makes sense!
These idiots just misunderstood him right?
He didn't ACTUALLY MEAN to give them the impression that the election was illigitimate and "stolen" and that Mike Pence was "a traitor" and that the only way they were going to be able to "take back their country" was to March to The Capitol and "Fight like hell!"
I get it now.
The guy who "says what he means and means what he says" didn't really MEAN what he said.
Right?
His cultist worshippers (being dumber than a box of doorknobs) just misunderstood him and took it all too far.

And then of course, once he got back to The West Wing he was so paralyzed with shock and disgust watching these low-life miscreants desecrate our nation's Capitol in his name on national TV he was unable to act decisively and effectively for a full 187 minutes.

Now it all makes sense.
He's innocent!

No wonder he's trying to throw them all under the bus and distance himself from this incursion and attempted coup.


You are just spouting nonsense.
 
Nice (but disingenuous) bait and switch distraction techniques you are using here.
Childish.
As soon as anyone starts talking about DJ Trump's

It is part of the factual, indisputable, historic record now.
What exactly (specifically) is it you are trying to argue with now?
You DO know that arguing with FACTS that are self-evident and indisputable is as foolish as pissing into the wind don't you?
Facts are such a nuisance, huh.
 
You are just spouting nonsense.
What specifically are you disagreeing with here?
Only one of two things can be true here.

Either Trump is guilty of inciting a riot and a failed coup....
OR
The people who invaded The Capitol were just a bunch of miscreant idiots who just misunderstood what he was trying to tell them.

So, which is it?
 
Saying that you know what Trump was thinking is not presenting facts. Trump said he knew they would be peaceful. You got nothing.
Quote me, from this thread
Saying what you claim

I can’t tell if you’re trolling or a blithering idiot. I’m leaning idiot.

I present facts, word for word, what trump said

You’re the one trying desperately to say what you think trump meant.
 
Quote me, from this thread
Saying what you claim

I can’t tell if you’re trolling or a blithering idiot. I’m leaning idiot.

I present facts, word for word, what trump said

You’re the one trying desperately to say what you think trump meant.
Trumps words, that you presented, did not tell anyone to commit violence. Those are the facts, moron.
 
What specifically are you disagreeing with here?
Only one of two things can be true here.

Either Trump is guilty of inciting a riot and a failed coup....
OR
The people who invaded The Capitol were just a bunch of miscreant idiots who just misunderstood what he was trying to tell them.

So, which is it?
Neither, just fevered 'logic' from your highly estimable intellect. We know that some of those who invaded were Feds trying to instigate. I already posted a video showing the protestors calling out Epps as a Fed for telling people for 2 days to invade the Capitol. Why is he not in jail? Answer, because because he was there to instigate.
 
Trumps words, that you presented, did not tell anyone to commit violence. Those are the facts, moron.
And that, moron, was NEVER part of this thread.

Trump NEVER told them to march Peacefully and Patriotically.
He said he knew they would, which turned out to be FALSE.
That omission certainly does't mean he told them to be violent.

But his other words that day ( also NOT part of this thread) certainly did, and you know it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top