First they complained about the makeup of the commission.........

berg80

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2017
20,776
17,396
2,320
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.

When they denied the Republicans their choice of who sits on the panel, they removed any legitimacy the panel had.

The Dems didn't agree to shit, they dictated their terms.
 
When they denied the Republicans their choice of who sits on the panel, they removed any legitimacy the panel had.

The Dems didn't agree to shit, they dictated their terms.

McCarthy proposed members who were potential witnesses and compromised

There were 212 other Republican Congress members available to serve. McCarthy forbid them to serve on the panel.
 
The Dems didn't agree to shit
That is a demonstrable lie. McCarthy assigned Rep. John Katko to negotiate terms with the Dems. After an agreement was reached Kevin sabotaged the compromise. His plan all along was to create the conditions by which he could claim the committee wasn't fair.

The thing is if you look at the way the committee has conducted itself there is no legitimate claim of a lack of fairness. Their work has been exemplary.
 
That is a demonstrable lie. McCarthy assigned Rep. John Katko to negotiate terms with the Dems. After an agreement was reached Kevin sabotaged the compromise. His plan all along was to create the conditions by which he could claim the committee wasn't fair.

The thing is if you look at the way the committee has conducted itself there is no legitimate claim of a lack of fairness. Their work has been exemplary.

They denied seats to the people the Republicans picked.

Their work has been a partisan dog and pony show.
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
65218r.jpg
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
So let's see, McCarthy wanted to negotiate terms, the demofks said no, And your point is?

We know that demofks don't play fairly. That's why we know the election was stolen, no way 80 million sane humans voted for xiden when that many didn't vote for the first black man. So silly.
 
When they denied the Republicans their choice of who sits on the panel, they removed any legitimacy the panel had.

The Dems didn't agree to shit, they dictated their terms.

Bullshit. Two of the people they wanted to seat on the panel were involved in the planning of the insurrection. It's like inviting the arsonists to investigate the causes of the fire. They're not going to stand up and say "I did it", now are they?

They also indicated that they had made up their minds about the causes of the violence. It was Nancy Pelosi's fault.

The purpose of the Commission isn't to provide cover for the criminals, it's to find out what happened. McCarthy's picks were to be seated for the sole purpose of derailing the investigation. No fucking way!
 
So let's see, McCarthy wanted to negotiate terms, the demofks said no, And your point is?

We know that demofks don't play fairly. That's why we know the election was stolen, no way 80 million sane humans voted for xiden when that many didn't vote for the first black man. So silly.

Democrats negotiated with McCarthy's rep and gave him everything he asked for. Then McCarthy talked to Donald Trump, and suddenly McCarthy said "No" to everything he wanted and walked away.

It seems Trump now regrets that mistake, but like every bad decision Trump has made since he was elected, it's too late to change things now.
 
Bullshit. Two of the people they wanted to seat on the panel were involved in the planning of the insurrection. It's like inviting the arsonists to investigate the causes of the fire. They're not going to stand up and say "I did it", now are they?

They also indicated that they had made up their minds about the causes of the violence. It was Nancy Pelosi's fault.

The purpose of the Commission isn't to provide cover for the criminals, it's to find out what happened. McCarthy's picks were to be seated for the sole purpose of derailing the investigation. No fucking way!
and everyone in the panel was the victim. so you have the victims controlling the kangaroo court. Cause that's within the demofk guidelines right?
 
.........which was BS since Dems agreed to a 9/11 style commission.

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., on Tuesday voiced opposition to legislation to create a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

In a lengthy statement a day before the House is set to vote on the measure, McCarthy complained about the negotiations, argued that multiple investigations into the riot already exist and said he wants the panel to also look into other instances of violence.

The legislation is the product of a compromise announced Friday by the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, Reps. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and John Katko, R-N.Y., who reached a deal on the guidelines for the panel to model it after the 9/11 Commission.


Then they claimed no one was paying attention, which is self-evidently absurd since the revelations from the hearings have consistently been stunning front page news and the talk of the board.

Then they claimed the hearings were one sided despite the fact that the witnesses who theoretically would be presenting the Trumpian point of view refused to testify for fear of self incrimination and or to protect the Orange Insurrectionist.

Then they claimed the hearings lacked due process. Well, yeah, they are hearings, not a legal proceeding. The evidentiary standards are not the same as in a court case. Anyone who is indicted will have an opportunity to defend themselves in court. Everyone understands that except Trumpleton's.

Then they claimed it was all hearsay even though the irrefutable fact is that witness testimony has corroborated the evidence, and the testimony of other witnesses, not disputed it.

What next? How about Liz Cheney wears Army boots. Yeah but.........Hillary. Inflation! Hey......squirrel.
Their little demigod is losing his shit, and so they are too.

Meh. We'll see. I'm just glad the story is getting out.
 
Democrats negotiated with McCarthy's rep and gave him everything he asked for. Then McCarthy talked to Donald Trump, and suddenly McCarthy said "No" to everything he wanted and walked away.

It seems Trump now regrets that mistake, but like every bad decision Trump has made since he was elected, it's too late to change things now.
then why did he not get his choice of questioner? So you think those two were his choice? you must stick needles in your eyes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top