Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

[sparky]

critical thinking and logic and common sense sparky.

It would seem elements that are painted dissident these days La Ram

The actual meaning of conspiracy does not impute being a tin foil hat wearing imbecile.

I do thank you for that BA..... ~S~

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It would seem elements that are painted dissident these days La Ram




I do thank you for that BA..... ~S~

The tin foil hat people the ones he are referring to are theofficial conspiracy theory apologists who say the towers and bld 7 collapsed due to fires and ignore the mountains of evidence we have posted here thst says otherwise and screams coverup.

 

[sparky]

The tin foil hat people the ones he are referring to are theofficial conspiracy theory apologists who say the towers and bld 7 collapsed due to fires and ignore the mountains of evidence we have posted here thst says otherwise and screams coverup.

I don't trust our government LaRam.

I trust the word of those that are on scene, in the mix , boots on the ground

like the two FF's i posted outside it all

fwiw, i wore the maltese cross as a young buck, we had each other's back, cut one of us and we all bled........when we were 'in' ,facing the dragon, we know what went down

our government could care less about us, our opinion, or otherwise any expression of our experience , while patronizing us all

we are all to be seen and not heard

~S~

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I don't trust our government LaRam.

I trust the word of those that are on scene, in the mix , boots on the ground

like the two FF's i posted outside it all

fwiw, i wore the maltese cross as a young buck, we had each other's back, cut one of us and we all bled........when we were 'in' ,facing the dragon, we know what went down

our government could care less about us, our opinion, or otherwise any expression of our experience , while patronizing us all

we are all to be seen and not heard

~S~

Damn I could not have said it any better myself word for word,you nailed it. there are some paid shills from the NSA thst have penetrated this site as I pointed out earlier but sadly,some of them are not paid shills,they are just braindead octas who believe everything their government and the media tells them incapable of critical thinking outside of the box.

As I mentioned before,it’s easy as taking candy from a baby to get the OCTAS to shut up when you give them evidence explosives brought down the towers because anytime they go on with their babble thst the fires brought them down,when you point out the facts the other buildings much closer to the towers than bld 7 sustained far greater damage to their structures and had far more extensive serious fires than bld 7 and mention their structures remained standing and did not collapse,their only comeback is you are a tin foil hatter cause they are too proud to admit being checkmated.

Also as I said,it’s always comical watching them dissapear from the thread or pretend not to see my post when I point out to them witnesses said they heard explosives go off in the basement ten seconds or so prior to hearing the plane strike above.the one person in the hundreds who actually DID try to prove me wrong,was an obvious shill from Langley or the NSA saying that the witnesses lied.

Yeah like they really have anything to gain by lying on the spot,matter of fact.thst would put them in prison if anything,lying to authorities obstructing an official police investigation,such an obvious plant thst guy was.

 

[candycorn]

I don't trust our government LaRam.

I trust the word of those that are on scene, in the mix , boots on the ground


~S~

And they work for the government....

I win.

 

[ranfunck]

And they work for the government....

I win.

You have never won an argument,

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You have never won an argument,

The UNDERSTATEMENT of the century. The shill from Langley thst has penetrated this site I was talking about,is another one who also wants to tell us the witnesses were lying. Langley shill here has had his ass handed to him on a platter every single time checkmated everytime.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You have never won an argument,

He just did

 

[Soupnazi630]

The UNDERSTATEMENT of the century. The shill from Langley thst has penetrated this site I was talking about,is another one who also wants to tell us the witnesses were lying. Langley shill here has had his ass handed to him on a platter every single time checkmated everytime.

You keep getting it backwards

You are the one constantly defeated and checkmated like a whiny bitch

 

[Skylar]

Read the official report i posted Sky

we are told the buildings 'pancaked' due to jet fuel weakening the structures , save for WT7, which also pancaked sans the jet fuel

~S~

Sans the jet fuel....but with massive fires caused by falling debris from WTC 1 and 2 that caused structural damage.

And again, there is no such thing as silent explosive demolition. Any explosion sufficient to sever structural steel beams is sufficient to make noise.

WTC 7's collapse began in silence. Excluding explosive demolition as the cause.

You can't get around that.

 

[Skylar]

Who knows?



Apparently that information is not important. The establishment destroyed those records.

SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options​

SEC: Government Destroyed Documents Regarding Pre-9/11 Put Options - Washington's Blog

web.archive.org

View attachment 1094139

Wayback Machine

So you don't have evidence that the Bush relatives shorted stock right before 911.

 

[Skylar]

which makes anyone a conspirator, just for asking BA

but i digress, the 'official story' being jet fuel weakened WTC1 & WTC2 , resulting in the 'pancake collapse' ......

WTC7 suffered the exact same pancake collapse ,and we're told it did so due to seismic activity?

Then why didn't all the WTC buildings even closer go down the same way?

View attachment 1094286

WTC 6 was 7 stories tall. WTC 1 was 110 stories tall. WTC 7 was 47 stories tall.

You already know all of this. You just hope we don't.

How is a seven story building supposed to 'shield' a 47 story building from tthe falling debris of the collapse of a 110 story building?

Explain it to us.

And while you're at it, explain how WTC 7 collapse began in silence?

 

[MisterBeale]

So you don't have evidence that the Bush relatives shorted stock right before 911.

. . . and you have no evidence that they didn't.

 

[Skylar]

. . . and you have no evidence that they didn't.

Laughing........so we're back to the Truther baseline of 'disprove my imagination'?

Yeah, there's a reason the Truther narrative is just an awful explanation of events.

 

[MisterBeale]

Laughing........so we're back to the Truther baseline of 'disprove my imagination'?

Yeah, there's a reason the Truther narrative is just an awful explanation of events.

Oh wow.

Ad hom followed by False equivalence.

 

[Skylar]

Oh wow.

Ad hom followed by False equivalence.

I didn't attack you personally. I attacked the 'disprove my imagination' argument.

Arguments and explanations are always fair game for criticism.

Try again. Maybe with evidence that the Bush relatives shorted stock immediately before 911? As there's been nothing presented to back that claim up.

 

[Skylar]

these guys???>>>



~S~

yes, those guys. Tell them that THEY were the one's that demolished WTC 7. Because that's who Larry Silverstein was talking to when he said 'pull it'. The FDNY.

So riddle me this, Sparky. In its entire 159 year history, how many high rises has the FDNY explosively demolished?

Round up.

 

[PeterPilot]

Sans the jet fuel....but with massive fires caused by falling debris from WTC 1 and 2 that caused structural damage.

And again, there is no such thing as silent explosive demolition. Any explosion sufficient to sever structural steel beams is sufficient to make noise.

WTC 7's collapse began in silence. Excluding explosive demolition as the cause.

You can't get around that.

A false narrative you offer sir. Countless people including firemen reported hearing explosions. Former congressman Curt Weldon, himself a fireman, just mentioned that last night on Tucker. It was an inside job, and not only that, it was a nuclear event. Thank Israel for it.

 

[hadit]

There is no such things as a cascade failure. That is why no high rise has ever collapsed to the ground in seconds until 9/11 unless they were prepped and wired to do so for months prior. Nor has it happened since.

Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee

Did you know that 3 towers fell on 9/11? World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed on 9/11 after the Twin Towers but was never hit by a plane. How?...

www1.ae911truth.org

Tom Sullivan grew up with the son of Jack Loizeaux, president and founder of CDI,and a pioneer in the controlled demolitions industry. In an interview with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Sullivan stated:


Sullivan said:

Given that such prep not only takes a long time but is very visible, and the fact that those buildings were all heavily used and had foot traffic around the clock, here are the questions you need to address:

1. If all three buildings were indeed wired with explosives, when were they so wired without anyone noticing anything at all?
2. How did the demolition teams manage to get in and out without arousing so much as a peep of suspicion, with absolutely no one coming forward after the event to say that they saw or heard suspicious activity with people tearing up floors and drilling holes in walls? That is, after all, what demolition teams do. No security guards, no cleaning teams, no late-night workers, no one at all said they heard or saw anything at all.
3. If the buildings were supposed to appear to collapse naturally, why would the explosives teams take all that time and so precisely place the explosives so as to make the collapse appear unnatural and risk drawing attention from conspiracy theorists? It would make more sense to be sloppy.
4. We know that secrets held by more than one person inevitably surface. Why has absolutely no one come forward in over 20 years even hinting that he/she was involved in secret drilling, tapping, and setting explosives to kill American citizens? Not even crackpots, and crackpots will falsely confess to murder. No deathbed confessions, nothing.

It's all fine and dandy to insist there were explosives, but they don't materialize from nothing with no one noticing anything.

 

[hadit]

I am quite surprised that so many respondents appear to accept the official line that office fires caused the collapse of WTC 7 on 9-11. I was watching live TV news when Larry Silverstein, WTC owner, stated that the Fire Dept. had just informed him that they were going to "pull" WTC 7. "Pull" is the term building demolition contractors use to describe the controlled demolition of a building. This is only one of the discrepancies which belie the official account. Many more questions are covered in the five minute video which appears at:

Demolition contractors and fire fighters do not necessarily mean the same thing when they say "pull" a building.