Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Oh, a "strange plane". That explains everything </sarcasm>. Now, you intimate that the "strange plane" and the "NASA facility" are related, and I guess we're supposed to believe that the passengers were taken off the plane and herded into the "facility" for ultimate execution. Now, for inconvenient questions. Why do you think these passengers were all taken off the plane in full view of bystanders? They would have had to have been in order for your favorite conspiracist to have observed them. When these passengers "deplaned", were any of them acting in any way like they were being herded by men in black wearing sunglasses? Were any of them asking questions, maybe wondering why they weren't where they expected the plane to land? Was anyone frantically trying to contact loved ones, maybe making a break for it? If they were going to be killed anyway, why not just let them die in the crash? Much neater and simpler than risking exposure this way.

Why, if this was all so mysterious, are there no photos or videos taken of this "strange plane", if it was so strange that your favorite conspiracist made note of it?

See, this is where wild theories usually fall apart, when they get looked at below their shiny surfaces.
There were photos of it, but you never saw them. MSM did mention the incident, but it was quickly swept under the rug to protect the fragile minds of folks like you.
 
One notes that, despite all the bloviating and hand waving, not a single attempt has been made to even address the questions. You tell us how buildings the size of these can be successfully wired for demolition without anyone seeing or hearing anything.

Look, I know it's an article of faith at this point but refusing to even look at inconvenient things like this isn't helping your cause.
My cause is shared by many other independent thinkers. Sadly they and I are a minority in this country of the brainwashed.
 
There were photos of it, but you never saw them. MSM did mention the incident, but it was quickly swept under the rug to protect the fragile minds of folks like you.
If you saw them, put them on here for examination. If you didn't see them, why do you believe in them?
 
My cause is shared by many other independent thinkers. Sadly they and I are a minority in this country of the brainwashed.
Then address the practical implications of your beliefs. If the buildings were wired, how did they manage to do it with no one noticing? In case you're not aware, wiring a building for demolition takes time and walls and floors are torn away so they can access the beams that need to be cut.

When and how was that done in the WTC?
 
No bodies were moved in?
And how would that be accomplished with the eyes of the world watching? That's like saying all traces of explosives were removed from the WTC1 and 2 collapse sites with none of the thousands of people watching seeing a thing.
 
I've noticed that the folks on one side of the issue have posted all the links, but the claims of the shills and spooks have none.

It is like they are leftists, demanding a standard of proof they themselves feel no need to adhere to.

Intelligent folks that read this thread will know the truth.
That is because the links have no evidence at all

How many times have you heard the words " free fall speed "? NONE of the buildings came down at free fall speed
 
That is because yoar views are ultimately, very naive. :lol:

You either have no idea how the deep state works, or you are part of it. I can't think of any other reason you are posting such silly drivel.

If you get educated on this topic, we will talk. Otherwise, I'll just point and laugh.

giphy.gif


Plausible_deniability.png


You are not educated on this topic. You willfully ignore facts and logic and cherry pick which ever soundbytes make you sound smart
 
If you saw them, put them on here for examination. If you didn't see them, why do you believe in them?
As I've mentioned before, I saw those pictures 20 years ago. If you were a curious person seeking the truth, you would have seen them too, but you didn't because you swallow whole with no questions everything your government and its media tells you.
 
As I've mentioned before, I saw those pictures 20 years ago. If you were a curious person seeking the truth, you would have seen them too, but you didn't because you swallow whole with no questions everything your government and its media tells you.
And there it is, the old, "I saw them once but can't find them now", and the inevitably repeated attempts to deflect attention from the issue onto me. Anyone can say anything, and the more outrageous the claim, the more evidence is required.
 
Back
Top Bottom