Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Concludes That 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

[munkle]

Thre firefighters are the ones who were closest. This could be trouble.

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

WTC 7, the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11, was located about 100 yards (91.4m) north of WTC 1, was a 47-story steel building, stood 610 ft. (186 m),

fireandsafetyjournalamericas.com

"“Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.”

NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

 

[MisterBeale]

duh.

If it weren't, NIST would make public the models they used, rather than keeping them classified.

 

[jc456]

Then they would have fallen from the bottom and they didn’t.

 

[munkle]

Then they would have fallen from the bottom and they didn’t.

The Twin Towers were banana peel demolitions which are used for tall narrow buildings that could tip over if there is a misfire. Bottom -up implosions are more common.

example

You can see the Twin Towers are getting blown to fuk. This is not a "collapse."

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition

By "James Madison" #howtheydid911 NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING As public awareness grows...

911explained.blogspot.com

 

[jc456]

The Twin Towers were banana peel demolitions which are used for tall narrow buildings that could tip over if there is a misfire. Bottom -up implosions are more common.

example

You can see the Twin Towers are getting blown to fuk. This is not a "collapse."

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition

By "James Madison" #howtheydid911 NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING As public awareness grows...

911explained.blogspot.com

I watched them fall, I saw structure damage at the top and the weight shift on the upper floors above the damage collapsed. I watched

 

[munkle]

I watched them fall, I saw structure damage at the top and the weight shift on the upper floors above the damage collapsed. I watched

Yes that was a nice touch. You saw the weight shift around the floors where you saw the molten steel dripping out the sides, exactly what steel-melting thermite charges would do. The melting core columns shifted weight to the perimeter columns so they bowed outwards, and gave the impression of an impending gravity collapse. But all the 70 floors beneath that were perfectly intact and undamaged.

No one is saying 9/11 was not an amazing piece of work.

German Minster of Defense Andreas Von Bulow:

"Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry." Tagesspiegel, 13. Jan. 2002 German Minster of Defense Andreas Von Bulow

 

[jc456]

Yes that was a nice touch. You saw the weight shift around the floors where you saw the molten steel dripping out the sides, exactly what steel-melting thermite charges would do. The melting core columns shifted weight to the perimeter columns so they bowed outwards, and gave the impression of an impending gravity collapse. But all the 70 floors beneath that were perfectly intact and undamaged.

No one is saying 9/11 was not an amazing piece of work.

German Minster of Defense Andreas Von Bulow:

"Planning the attacks was a master deed, in technical and organizational terms. To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry." Tagesspiegel, 13. Jan. 2002 German Minster of Defense Andreas Von Bulow

Never saw molten steel and neither did you

 

[munkle]

Never saw molten steel and neither did you

This is well established.

Firefighters report Molten steel

9-11 Research: Molten Metal

 

[jc456]

This is well established.

Firefighters report Molten steel

9-11 Research: Molten Metal

View attachment 1245002

Running down steel beams? Where’d it come from?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Those Muslims have to be really pissed off now. Wasting a bunch of perfectly good suicide bombers on a couple of buildings that were already gonna be blown up by Elvis.

 

[munkle]

Running down steel beams? Where’d it come from?

"If you really want to know the answers to your questions, and you are not just talking shit, I recommend you read:

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition​

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition

By "James Madison" #howtheydid911 NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING As public awareness grows...

911explained.blogspot.com

"As public awareness grows about the truth about 9/11, it serves to point out that many features of the towers' destruction fit perfectly with standard patterns of demolition. Evidence which at first seems puzzling is in fact consistent with known demolition techniques.


WTC 7 differed from Towers One and Two in that WTC7 was a traditional "bottom-up" implosion. The Twin Towers, on the other hand, exhibited the more unfamiliar pattern of a "banana peel" demolition, which starts at the middle or the top of a building and progresses downward. The below demolition in China shows the pattern of streamers of arcing debris that we see coming from the Twin Towers, as the cutting of supports begins high above ground level and works its way down.

Banana Peel Demolition in China next to Twin Towers


Banana peel demolitions are used for taller, narrower buildings, where there is danger of the building tipping over should the bottom be cut and the rest of the sequence not execute perfectly.

But first, just how does a demolition work? Students of the truth about 9/11 will not be surprised to learn that it is essentially the art and science of causing to happen what cannot happen without careful engineering: all structural supports in a building must be cut at essentially the same time, so that all pieces are falling at free-fall acceleration through thin air. It is a difficult undertaking to remove all supports nearly simultaneously in redundantly engineered modern high-rises, with extensive cross-bracing which transfers load from compromised members to sound ones. Even then, failed demolitions are not uncommon.

In the below images we see the principle support columns in the "core" of WTC 1, an extensively cross-braced steel assembly which served as the backbone of the towers, and held 70% of the weight.

Twin Tower core backbone under construction




Illustration of main support columns





One standard technique is the use of "cutter' and "kicker" charges, in which the first set of charges, the cutters, cut the steel beam supports at precisely timed intervals, and the kicker charge "kicks" the cut piece outward. In all the film evidence of the Towers' destruction, straight, cleanly cut pieces of steel beam can be seen spinning outward from the Towers at explosive speeds, across an area at least three times as long as the Towers are wide. Thirty foot, multi-ton pieces of steel beam and perimeter assembly were found nearly three football fields away from the nearest tower, and windows were blown out across the WTC. These startling facts cannot be overstated.


Cut Steel Being Hurled Laterally at Speeds up to 80 MPH

"

...MORE

 

[sparky]

now you know why the FF's were under gag order.......~S~

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Those Muslim terrorists have to be really pissed that they wasted perfectly useful suicide bombers on a couple of buildings that were already being bombed by the US government.

 

[jc456]

"If you really want to know the answers to your questions, and you are not just talking shit, I recommend you read:

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition​

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition

By "James Madison" #howtheydid911 NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING As public awareness grows...

911explained.blogspot.com

"As public awareness grows about the truth about 9/11, it serves to point out that many features of the towers' destruction fit perfectly with standard patterns of demolition. Evidence which at first seems puzzling is in fact consistent with known demolition techniques.


WTC 7 differed from Towers One and Two in that WTC7 was a traditional "bottom-up" implosion. The Twin Towers, on the other hand, exhibited the more unfamiliar pattern of a "banana peel" demolition, which starts at the middle or the top of a building and progresses downward. The below demolition in China shows the pattern of streamers of arcing debris that we see coming from the Twin Towers, as the cutting of supports begins high above ground level and works its way down.

Banana Peel Demolition in China next to Twin Towers


Banana peel demolitions are used for taller, narrower buildings, where there is danger of the building tipping over should the bottom be cut and the rest of the sequence not execute perfectly.

But first, just how does a demolition work? Students of the truth about 9/11 will not be surprised to learn that it is essentially the art and science of causing to happen what cannot happen without careful engineering: all structural supports in a building must be cut at essentially the same time, so that all pieces are falling at free-fall acceleration through thin air. It is a difficult undertaking to remove all supports nearly simultaneously in redundantly engineered modern high-rises, with extensive cross-bracing which transfers load from compromised members to sound ones. Even then, failed demolitions are not uncommon.

In the below images we see the principle support columns in the "core" of WTC 1, an extensively cross-braced steel assembly which served as the backbone of the towers, and held 70% of the weight.

Twin Tower core backbone under construction




Illustration of main support columns





One standard technique is the use of "cutter' and "kicker" charges, in which the first set of charges, the cutters, cut the steel beam supports at precisely timed intervals, and the kicker charge "kicks" the cut piece outward. In all the film evidence of the Towers' destruction, straight, cleanly cut pieces of steel beam can be seen spinning outward from the Towers at explosive speeds, across an area at least three times as long as the Towers are wide. Thirty foot, multi-ton pieces of steel beam and perimeter assembly were found nearly three football fields away from the nearest tower, and windows were blown out across the WTC. These startling facts cannot be overstated.


Cut Steel Being Hurled Laterally at Speeds up to 80 MPH

"

...MORE

what is it you think this proves?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Thre firefighters are the ones who were closest. This could be trouble.

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

WTC 7, the third high-rise to collapse on 9/11, was located about 100 yards (91.4m) north of WTC 1, was a 47-story steel building, stood 610 ft. (186 m),

fireandsafetyjournalamericas.com

NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

dude thats OLD news,there have been MANY threads of this made here in the last couple decades on this.a really good poster that used to be here named EOTS had some really great stuff on this in the past.

incredible that the idiots around here thay say no explosives were used ignore the testimonys of MANY of these very credible firefighters who heard explosives and were experienced in the sound of explosives plus the fact witnesses said they saw flashes of lights inside the towers.

now you know why the FF's were under gag order.......~S~
yep.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Those Muslim terrorists have to be really pissed that they wasted perfectly useful suicide bombers on a couple of buildings that were already being bombed by the US government.

coming from a trollboy who believes in the magic bullet theory of the warren commssion,we should ALL listen to you that 19 muslims pulled off 9/11 you kill me with your no end to comedy .

thanks for proving as always you NEVER read facts that prove you wrong.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Twin Towers were banana peel demolitions which are used for tall narrow buildings that could tip over if there is a misfire. Bottom -up implosions are more common.

example

You can see the Twin Towers are getting blown to fuk. This is not a "collapse."

9/11: How it Was Done, the Science of Demolition

By "James Madison" #howtheydid911 NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING As public awareness grows...

911explained.blogspot.com

not only that but besides the very credible firefighters testimonys we have witnesses that saw flashes of lights in the towers and hearing explosives going off shortly before they came down as well as the fact we have witnesses that said they head explosives go off in the BASEMENT of the towers BEFORE the plane struck above and the video footage of the towers lobby backs them up. yet we have people like Roswan Markerr saying muslins did it and the fires brought them down,dont they EVER get tired of embarrassing themselves with shit on their face in defeat?

but then again,he also belives in magic bullets that oswald shot kennedy so what else do you expect? I cant make that shit up that he has said that,everybody that knows him knows he HAS said that MANY times in the past. its almost always paid shills like him that are paid to troll these boards that deny reality,he proved that in spades that he did not even watch the videos.

 

[sparky]

What we don't want to admit is, we've allegiances with some rather nasty factions

When their machinations surface our government does it's best Baghdad Bob

But you're not interested in any of that......jingo's never are

What you should be interested in is how our government became less transparent, less clarity

This goes back to possibly EO 10501

Executive Order 10501—Safeguarding Official Information in the Interests of the Defense of the United States | The American Presidency Project

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

~S~

 

[toobfreak]

You saw the weight shift around the floors where you saw the molten steel dripping out the sides, exactly what steel-melting thermite charges would do.

If I wait until midnight tonight and light my electric arc torch up, it will light my room up exactly like a sun rising, but that sill doesn't make it a star, nor morning.

What you saw there was obviously a pooling of molten or semi-molten metal products which had pooled within the most intensely hot areas of the fire until they found a natural escape running out a window. Just because it might appear somewhat like the result of thermite doesn't mean there was thermite used in the building. It takes INTENSE HEAT to even start a thermite reaction.

Since you are implying the building was destroyed deliberately by set demolition fires, anyone doing that would have tried to conceal the effort by setting the thermite to run down the central core inside the building where it couldn't be seen.

Better still, they would have arranged to fly jets into the buildings that were already carrying the needed explosives, maybe for military use, to justify the collapse, and they would have evacuated the buildings knowing full well in advance of their pending collapse.

In a funny sort of bass-ackward kind of way, you just disproved your own theory.

 

[sparky]

Better still, they would have arranged to fly jets into the buildings that were already carrying the needed explosives, maybe for military use, to justify the collapse

The tin hat brigade has consistently insisted normal jets were not employed Mr Toob

Further, we were told there was a complete and total incineration of passengers, including the 'terrorists' .......yet they found>>>

~S~