Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

these guys???>>>



~S~

9ov58q.jpg
 
Last edited:

Bush Relatives SHORTED THE MARKET Right Before 9/11! w/ James Corbett​

Mar 27, 2025



Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money​

by Corbett | Sep 11, 2015 | Documentaries, Podcasts | 52 comments





View attachment 1094078


Was there actually any evidence that Bush relatives shorted the market?
 

Bush Relatives SHORTED THE MARKET Right Before 9/11! w/ James Corbett​

Mar 27, 2025



Episode 308 – 9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money​

by Corbett | Sep 11, 2015 | Documentaries, Podcasts | 52 comments





View attachment 1094078

I find it hard to believe our intel didn't realize what these terrorists were planning after following them through decades of it.....~S~
 
these guys???>>>



~S~

Credible witnesses like these firefighters is too much logic and common sense for the official conspiracy theorists like toofreak to comprehend and Langley agents like nazi and toddsterPARROT do this :scared1:when you show them these videos actually the octal do as well.
 
The Langley agents that have penetrated this site that have posted on this thread they come up with the funniest shit when you post pics like this thst these airliners got damaged like thst from birds and then they ask us to believe thst these airliners were somehow powerful enough to penetrate steel when they could not even sustain damage from mere birds flying and in all cases had to turn back and land but yet they somehow penetrsted steel in their fantasyland they live on,it makes you wonder how much crack these official conspiracy theory apologists smoke everyday,even a child can understand that dog don’t hunt. :rofl:

They also don’t act foolish and juvenile and say the witnesses were lying either when they said they heard explosives go off in the basements before the plane hit to avoid admitting they were checkmated.:rofl:.the plane hit the tower but it only went through it aided by explosives just like witnesses said.
 
and then they ask us to believe thst these airliners were somehow powerful enough to penetrate steel when they could not even sustain damage from mere birds flying and in all cases had to turn back and land but yet they somehow penetrsted steel in their fantasyland

What steel?
 
What steel?
The steel they shipped to China before it could be thoroughly examined for clues.

". . . For some victims’ families, however, the selling of the steel that entombed their loved ones could prove an example of cold-hearted global trade.

The families had made emotional appeals to the city of New York to stop the recycling until further clues could be found about the towers’ collapse. New York officials said the investigation could continue without the physical wreckage. . . ."

proxy-image
 
In order for this theory make sense, it me is required to believe that:

(1) at some point prior to 9/11/2001, somebody wired the internal structure of the metal beams and snide the twin towers with explosives and did so unseen.

(2) and that the ones performing this controlled demolitions coordinated the detonations with the terrorists flying passenger jets were into those buildings n that day (which requires that they have been checked non those terrorist stacks in advance).

(3) and that they were also committing mass murder of the passengers and the occupants of the building on that date in order to achieve their (presumably) financial crimes.

(4) and that the passengers on both other flights were killed as cover for the real targets, the Twin Towers.

(5) and that the conspirators have been able to plan and perpetrate and then cover-up (via silence) the “actual” crime for 23 plus years WITH nobody breaking ranks.

What are the odds of any one of those things happening?

Now, compound that by the odds against each facet of the above having taken place.

It’s ok to question the official story. But for this particular alternative theory to be taken seriously necessarily requires not JUST the suspension of disbelief, but a willingness to be as gullible as all hell.
 
The steel they shipped to China before it could be thoroughly examined for clues.

". . . For some victims’ families, however, the selling of the steel that entombed their loved ones could prove an example of cold-hearted global trade.

The families had made emotional appeals to the city of New York to stop the recycling until further clues could be found about the towers’ collapse. New York officials said the investigation could continue without the physical wreckage. . . ."

proxy-image

You needed a clue about how jets weighing over 100 tons crashed through the steel of the WTC?
 
It’s ok to question the official story.
which makes anyone a conspirator, just for asking BA

but i digress, the 'official story' being jet fuel weakened WTC1 & WTC2 , resulting in the 'pancake collapse' ......

WTC7 suffered the exact same pancake collapse ,and we're told it did so due to seismic activity?

Then why didn't all the WTC buildings even closer go down the same way?

1743159120321.webp
 
The steel they shipped to China before it could be thoroughly examined for clues.

". . . For some victims’ families, however, the selling of the steel that entombed their loved ones could prove an example of cold-hearted global trade.

The families had made emotional appeals to the city of New York to stop the recycling until further clues could be found about the towers’ collapse. New York officials said the investigation could continue without the physical wreckage. . . ."

proxy-image
the 9/11 coverup commission in action.
 
which makes anyone a conspirator, just for asking BA

but i digress, the 'official story' being jet fuel weakened WTC1 & WTC2 , resulting in the 'pancake collapse' ......

WTC7 suffered the exact same pancake collapse ,and we're told it did so due to seismic activity?

Then why didn't all the WTC buildings even closer go down the same way?

View attachment 1094286
:yes_text12::TH_WAY~113::thankusmile:
that will require them to use too much critical thinking and logic and common sense sparky.

that is the SAME EXACT question i have asked the OCTA;S HUNDREDS of times over the years,that if bld 7 came down and collapsed in a pancake style due to fires from the debris of the towers as the two towers also did,then how come the other buildings you posted in that photo that were MUCH closer and had even FAR more extensive fires to them than bld 7 did as other posters have posted pics of over the years,then why did THEY not collapse in the same pancake style as they did?

everytime i ask them that question,THIS-:scared1:is the answer i always get from them EVERYTIME.:abgg2q.jpg:
 
The steel they shipped to China before it could be thoroughly examined for clues.

". . . For some victims’ families, however, the selling of the steel that entombed their loved ones could prove an example of cold-hearted global trade.

The families had made emotional appeals to the city of New York to stop the recycling until further clues could be found about the towers’ collapse. New York officials said the investigation could continue without the physical wreckage. . . ."

proxy-image
Kinda like how in the JFK assassination,you see an FBI agent picking up a bullet in the grass and putting it in his pocket and walking off and how the LIMO was destroyed before it could be examined for evidence yet that FBI man did not get prosecuted for destruction of evidence nor the secret servicemen for destroying evidence,yep no coverup here in either one of these cases.no sirree.bob. :abgg2q.jpg: :cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
which makes anyone a conspirator, just for asking BA

but i digress, the 'official story' being jet fuel weakened WTC1 & WTC2 , resulting in the 'pancake collapse' ......

WTC7 suffered the exact same pancake collapse ,and we're told it did so due to seismic activity?

Then why didn't all the WTC buildings even closer go down the same way?

View attachment 1094286
If we want to pretend that we already have the scientific acumen for answering the physical and material bases for the collapses, under those extreme circumstances, we are free to pretend.

That doesn’t mean that what happened as seen by our own eyes happened due to some incredible conspiracy.

Also, it isn’t quite true that asking questions is the same as being a conspiracy theorist.

The actual meaning of conspiracy does not impute being a tin foil hat wearing imbecile.

There was, after all is said and done, a conspiracy to hijack passenger jets and fly them into various U.S. buildings.
 
Back
Top Bottom