How Many People Would Still Believe the 9/11 Official Story if They Knew Jet Fuel Was Only Kerosene? Because That's What It Is

OMG. Vaporized fuel burns or evaporates instantly. I didn't see any jet engines blasting exhaust at the towers.
:rolleyes: That's some low IQ nonsense right there buddy. :cuckoo:

It's called vaporized fuel because it's already evaporated, you moron.

You clearly have no clue what you are talking about.
 
One more time: the way the WTC was designed, when these jets exploded, they blew off the insulation designed to protect the floor spans, and the resulting jet fire was more than hot enough (1500°F) in order to weaken and soften said spans enough that they sagged under their own weight, pulled free of their supports, and collapsed.

Once the floors began collapsing, it quickly became a runaway condition leading to total structural failure.
/-----/ THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. I've been saying that for 25 years. But the die-hard conspiracy nuts refuse to believe it. I've posted images of bridges that collapsed because a tanker fire beneath them softened the steel.
1776511488895.webp

Then there's Rosie.
1776511372720.webp
 
We used to have fire training at work. What did we light for the fire? Kerosene. It got extremely hot.



Why do people believe that for the first time in the history of high-rise fires, three towers fell flat in seconds, including one (WTC7) not even hit by a plane? Because JET FUEL! THIS WAS DIFFERENT! This stuff pushes hundred ton monster jetliners across oceans at 500 MPH! That must be some hot stuff!

But guess what? It's only kerosene, a little higher grade with some anti-freeze and other minor additives. Burns at roughly the same temperature when spilled into open air. Which is what the 9/11 fires were.

Remember how the shills who control you yelled "But that was JET FUEL you idiot!" Saying "That was kerosene!" just doesn't have the same ring. But yep that's what jet fuel is. For all you have heard. Nothing to make two skyscrapers fall flat (and WTC7? A whole other question.)

Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

Man plays with jet fuel, does not explode:



Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?




NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: On Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

I've worked as a fireman/paramedic before. IIRC kerosene will burn at 3,800 degrees F under stoichiometric conditions.

Back then kerosene space heaters were in widespread use and caused several housefires every winter. We had a lot of training on kerosene fires.
 
Last edited:
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what caused WTC7 to collapse. And then there is the velocity that all three towers fell, which was close to freefall. As an engineer, that speed of collapse defies natural physics. I really don't care what or who brought the towers down, I just need to understand the true science without the political spin.

I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what caused WTC7 to collapse.

It was heavily damaged by debris from WTC 1.
And then it burned for 7 hours before it collapsed.

And then there is the velocity that all three towers fell, which was close to freefall.

Close, but no cigar.
 
Mossad job #1, always troll 911 truth....


When will you fly a 757 at 530 mph with nose 8 feet above ground?

When will you stop whining long enough to pull your head out of your ass and provide actual back up?
 
The most obvious controlled demolition in human history
How does controlled demolition work?

Yeah. They blow the supports and let the weight of everything above squash everything below

When the planes hit where thy did that allowed the floors above to crash down.

How much does one floor weigh? How much do twenty floors weigh?

How much force is generated when that amount of weight falls 10 feet? How about 100 feet?

No engineer in world would consider that kind of load

It would have to be almost solid structure
 
One more time: the way the WTC was designed, when these jets exploded, they blew off the insulation designed to protect the floor spans, and the resulting jet fire was more than hot enough (1500°F) in order to weaken and soften said spans enough that they sagged under their own weight, pulled free of their supports, and collapsed.

Once the floors began collapsing, it quickly became a runaway condition leading to total structural failure.

Im thinking that the design team was all jooos and they were in on it.

Jooos be planners.
 
15th post
Oh yeah

Kerosene actually has more available energy in terms of BTUs than gasoline
 
I challenge anyone to jump in a commercial airliner filled with kerosene and its impurities. I would say let us know how that works out but................................
 
Look, stupid, you are just being silly or deliberately obtuse--- floors are designed to support the load of their own weight plus the weight of office furniture and people, etc. When the two floors above suddenly drop on top of you and you are already weakened, you only add to the collapse, and every subsequent floor after that is only overburdened more and more.

That is a basic runaway condition in mechanical engineering every student learns on their first day, and the WTC design was particularly prone to it since the floor spans themselves added essentially nothing to the overall strength of the building as all of the actual strength was in the central core and the outer skin was basically just held in place by the interlinking floor spans which only served to stabilize the outer skin.

Soon as a few floor spans let go, the entire integrity of the building designed in the 1960s was gone. It was a cost-saving design.

All because the original designers never considered the possibility of someone deliberately flying a jumbo jet into them, so never intended the thermal insulation of the spans to withstand such a serious airblast.

I think that we are discovering that there is a ton of propaganda being pushed by Iranian money to grow discord in the US.
 
Mossad job #1, always troll 911 truth....


When will you fly a 757 at 530 mph with nose 8 feet above ground?

The govt took all relevant video in the area. So what happened to AA flight 77 then? That was a legitimate flight. I have lots of question marks as to how or if the govt was involved since they do continually lie all the time. Also, it was quite interesting that the pentagon couldn't account for 2 trillion dollars but after 911, no one else ever said a thing about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom