Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

I kind of figured it had to have been hit and damaged by the main tower collapses.


Yep. I've seen a lot of buildings dynamited; the twin towers collapsed from the top down--- there was no failure of the ground floors integrity until the upper sections hit it, it was not like the whole building dropped as one like in a demolition.

In fact, people in the fire escapes and ground floors were still running down them and out the doors as the buildings collapsed.

People who survived inside the buildings could hear the floors collapsing on top of them even as the part of their building was steady and stable--- no one reported seeing or hearing explosions going off in the central tower or saw or felt the building moving or collapsing around them until the structure above them came down on them.

That rules out a man-made demolition.

I once asked a conspiracy theorist where would they hide that much explosives. He didn't have an answer and the conversation ended on that note.
 
I once asked a conspiracy theorist where would they hide that much explosives. He didn't have an answer and the conversation ended on that note.

Well, I know where they would hide the explosives, the thing is, to install them would require closing these buildings for weeks, evacuating all people, and tearing stuff apart--- walls, decks, flooring, etc., drilling, running wires, etc., then repairing all the damage, patching holes, painting, cleaning up, and putting everything back. It is insane to think no one would notice, not to mention why these buildings had been closed.

Oh, the other thing--- even if all of this had been planned, the initial point of collapse for the Towers was at the points of impact; how could anyone have possibly known where the jets would hit the buildings to know where to set the detonations in advance?

They couldn't. The more you know, the more it is obvious that the conspiracy theories on 9/11 don't hold water.
 
Well, I know where they would hide the explosives, the thing is, to install them would require closing these buildings for weeks, evacuating all people, and tearing stuff apart--- walls, decks, flooring, etc., drilling, running wires, etc., then repairing all the damage, patching holes, painting, cleaning up, and putting everything back. It is insane to think no one would notice, not to mention why these buildings had been closed.

Oh, the other thing--- even if all of this had been planned, the initial point of collapse for the Towers was at the points of impact; how could anyone have possibly known where the jets would hit the buildings to know where to set the detonations in advance?

They couldn't. The more you know, the more it is obvious that the conspiracy theories on 9/11 don't hold water.

I see holes in the story this thread was created from. Both writers were firefighters and one calls himself a 9/11 activist which is a polite way to say conspiracy theorist.
 
I once asked a conspiracy theorist where would they hide that much explosives. He didn't have an answer and the conversation ended on that note.
This particular article deals with WTC 7 but if Seven was wired for demolition then they all were.


FSJA Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas: "Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?"


"Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition."



Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job - "Calling Out Bravo-7" Documentary.


I’m afraid you are making far too much sense for the coincidence theorists on here to comprehend,just look at their replys.logic and common sense that these were not regular explosives that brought down the towers is too complicated for them to understand I’m afraid.the overwhelming evidence thst explosives brought the towers down such as witnesses saying they heard explosives going off,many being very credible being firefighters experiened in the sound of explosives,that the survivors in the lower lobby heard explosives going off in the basement 10 seconds or so before the plane struck above,and that the best architects and engineers in the world have said explosives brought the towers down,all thst logic and common sense is too much for them to comprehend so they don’t try to comprehend it knowing it will fry their brains and they will have to go to the hospital from a nervous breakdown. :rofl:

Good job owning and taking toofreak to school checkmating him. :thup:
 
I am quite surprised that so many respondents appear to accept the official line that office fires caused the collapse of WTC 7 on 9-11. I was watching live TV news when Larry Silverstein, WTC owner, stated that the Fire Dept. had just informed him that they were going to "pull" WTC 7. "Pull" is the term building demolition contractors use to describe the controlled demolition of a building. This is only one of the discrepancies which belie the official account. Many more questions are covered in the five minute video which appears at:


WTC 7 was struck by debris from the north tower when it collapsed and that's what started the fires. The collapse of the of south tower is on video from a lot of angles and there is no smoke anywhere near the bottom when it collapses. Dynamite kind of leaves evidence of smoke when it explodes.
That could have caused the fires but the fires sure as hell did not cause them to collapse,anybody who thinks thst has been smoking too much crack. :rofl: What nobody has ever been able to explain is that there were other buildings much closer to the towers with ten times far more extensive damage done to them and far much worse severe fires yet those buildings remained standing so so much fornthe fires causing the collapse theory,again someone would have to be on crack to believe thst sense witnesses heard explosives from the basement same with the towers and the best architects and engineers in the world along with demolition experts said explosives brought them down.:rofl:
 
This particular article deals with WTC 7 but if Seven was wired for demolition then they all were.


FSJA Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas: "Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?"


"Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition."



Firefighters Call 9/11 an Inside Job - "Calling Out Bravo-7" Documentary.


The official conspiracy theory apologists will never watch your videos of course sense as we know,they only see what they WANT to see.there s also a 30 year captain who represents the best pilots in the world at pilots for 9/11 truth who have said no plane struck the pentagon or crashed in shanks villa either but the occasional here have the hysterical funny logic those expert pilots voices don’t count,only what the media and our government institutions say count or matter. :rofl:
 
I’m afraid you are making far too much sense for the coincidence theorists on here to comprehend,just look at their replys.logic and common sense that these were not regular explosives that brought down the towers is too complicated for them to understand I’m afraid.the overwhelming evidence thst explosives brought the towers down such as witnesses saying they heard explosives going off,many being very credible being firefighters experiened in the sound of explosives,that the survivors in the lower lobby heard explosives going off in the basement 10 seconds or so before the plane struck above,and that the best architects and engineers in the world have said explosives brought the towers down,all thst logic and common sense is too much for them to comprehend so they don’t try to comprehend it knowing it will fry their brains and they will have to go to the hospital from a nervous breakdown. :rofl:

Good job owning and taking toofreak to school checkmating him. :thup:
What’s really comical more than anything else when I tell trolls about witnesses said they heard explosives go off in the basements in the towers before the plane struck above,they always run off,the only time I ever saw someone reply to it he came up with the most comedy reply ever,thst the witnesses were lying.I can’t make this shit up,he really said thst honest. :rofl: :laughing0301: Never mind the fact witnesses being interviewed on the spot have NOTHING to gain by lying,man these handlers will tell these paid shills to say ANYTHING at these forums.:rofl: :laughing0301:
 
no one reported seeing or hearing explosions

witnesses saying they heard explosives going off

credible being firefighters experiened in the sound of explosives,
Many prominent structures have FD pre plans , mostly how to evacuate and contain a fire. Part of this is shutting down any potential fuel or hazards such as electricity ,gas, etc accelerants . Whatever is a 'fire load' and/or hazmat is also a consideration.

That said, there are plenty of things that 'go boom', ammo for one is a rather unnerving sound , a BBQ gas tank as well, that said FF's know what they're hearing.

The reports from those FF inside the twin towers took them totally by surprise, it was nothing close to the norm

explain that......

~S~
 
I’m afraid you are making far too much sense for the coincidence theorists on here to comprehend,just look at their replys.logic and common sense that these were not regular explosives that brought down the towers is too complicated for them to understand I’m afraid.the overwhelming evidence thst explosives brought the towers down such as witnesses saying they heard explosives going off,many being very credible being firefighters experiened in the sound of explosives,that the survivors in the lower lobby heard explosives going off in the basement 10 seconds or so before the plane struck above,and that the best architects and engineers in the world have said explosives brought the towers down,all thst logic and common sense is too much for them to comprehend so they don’t try to comprehend it knowing it will fry their brains and they will have to go to the hospital from a nervous breakdown. :rofl:

Good job owning and taking toofreak to school checkmating him. :thup:
There is no evidence whatsoever that explosives brought it down dumbass
 
15th post
The reports from those FF inside the twin towers took them totally by surprise, it was nothing close to the norm

News to me. Link me to one of the reports.
 
News to me. Link me to one of the reports.

9/11 records everything said Toob, but this is not all public info, so unless you caught it on a scanner at the time (and could decipher 10 codes) it would need to be legally requested.

FWIW, this is where my claim of gag order comes from , along with the fact there were no direct statements from any fire chief and/or FD liaison in the 'official report'>


further, the WTC was 'bombed' in '93 , seems they (the terrorists) snuck it all right on by and in then......

and then there's the time line>>>>



we're told jet fuel was the collapse culprit, which (watching the vids) burnt up within minutes of impact. One would think the level of damage would have left nothing alive, yet>>>



somehow this resulted in the collapse of 3 structures via 2 planes in exactly the same manner???

~S~
 
Last edited:
9/11 records everything said Toob, but this is not all public info, so unless you caught it on a scanner at the time (and could decipher 10 codes) it would need to be legally requested.

Sorry, but that was a whole lot of nothing. I saw nothing there to corroborate the claim of unusual detonations, in fact, video in "The Waving Woman" only further supports the fact that the buildings burned for an hour until they weakened and collapsed at the point of plane impact.
 
I’m afraid you are making far too much sense for the coincidence theorists on here to comprehend,just look at their replys.logic and common sense that these were not regular explosives that brought down the towers is too complicated for them to understand I’m afraid.the overwhelming evidence thst explosives brought the towers down such as witnesses saying they heard explosives going off,many being very credible being firefighters experiened in the sound of explosives,that the survivors in the lower lobby heard explosives going off in the basement 10 seconds or so before the plane struck above,and that the best architects and engineers in the world have said explosives brought the towers down,all thst logic and common sense is too much for them to comprehend so they don’t try to comprehend it knowing it will fry their brains and they will have to go to the hospital from a nervous breakdown. :rofl:

Good job owning and taking toofreak to school checkmating him. :thup:
The fact Langley agent toddsterPARROT who can’t stand toe to toe in a debate same as all Langley shills out a fake news,mean I hit a home run. :rofl: Langley agent toddsterPARROT is like Alex Jones controlled opposition,
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom