Enter the Age of Censorship, FCC circumvents Congress to classify internet as Public Utility

[Pogo]

So two posts, no answer. I'll keep a running tally.

Pogo... really?

Do you remember this?

"If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor, period." - obama

Net Neutrality is the ACA for the internet.

Now think...

ACA has nothing to do with FCC.
That's three.

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

 

[007]

There's ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX MILLION DOLLARS of GEORGE SOROS MONEY behind the OBAMA FORCED, DONE IN SECRET, OBAMA INSTIGATED internet take over.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

"NET NEUTRALITY?" You've GOT to be fucking JOKING!

 

[007]

So two posts, no answer. I'll keep a running tally.

Pogo... really?

Do you remember this?

"If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor, period." - obama

Net Neutrality is the ACA for the internet.

Now think...

ACA has nothing to do with FCC.
That's three.

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

 

[ClosedCaption]

There's ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX MILLION DOLLARS of GEORGE SOROS MONEY behind the OBAMA FORCED, DONE IN SECRET, OBAMA FORCED internet take over.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

"NET NEUTRALITY?" You've GOT to be fucking JOKING!

Except it wasnt done in secret the proposal has been out there since May 2014. But you claimed it was secret.

What does that say about you?

 

[Pogo]

So two posts, no answer. I'll keep a running tally.

Pogo... really?

Do you remember this?

"If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor, period." - obama

Net Neutrality is the ACA for the internet.

Now think...

ACA has nothing to do with FCC.
That's three.

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

That's seven.

 

[007]

Pogo... really?

Do you remember this?

"If you like your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor, period." - obama

Net Neutrality is the ACA for the internet.

Now think...

ACA has nothing to do with FCC.
That's three.

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

That's seven.

Yup, seven times it has been explained to you and you played ignorant.

 

[007]

There's ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX MILLION DOLLARS of GEORGE SOROS MONEY behind the OBAMA FORCED, DONE IN SECRET, OBAMA FORCED internet take over.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

"NET NEUTRALITY?" You've GOT to be fucking JOKING!

Except it wasnt done in secret the proposal has been out there since May 2014. But you claimed it was secret.

What does that say about you?

You're a bald, faced LIAR.

The FCC chairman was even CALLED TO TESTIFY IN FRONT OF CONGRESS to tell them what was in this, AND HE IGNORED CONGRESS.

Now go fucking LIE somewhere else, JACK ASS.



The so-called net neutrality proposal has been the subject of fierce debate, in part because the 332-page plan is being kept from public eyes. President Obama's vocal push for aggressive Internet rules also has raised questions on Capitol Hill over undue influence by the White House -- but House Republicans who had planned a hearing on that very subject said Wednesday they would postpone after Chairman Tom Wheeler allegedly refused to testify.

Locked and Loaded FCC primed for vote on Internet regs amid 11th-hour drama

 

[Pogo]

ACA has nothing to do with FCC.
That's three.

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

That's seven.

Yup, seven times it has been explained to you and you played ignorant.

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?

I got no answers. All I get is

. Doesn't impress me.

Eight.

 

[OnePercenter]

Keep in mind that anything Republicans are 'for' is bad for the working class.

 

[ClosedCaption]

There's ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX MILLION DOLLARS of GEORGE SOROS MONEY behind the OBAMA FORCED, DONE IN SECRET, OBAMA FORCED internet take over.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

"NET NEUTRALITY?" You've GOT to be fucking JOKING!

Except it wasnt done in secret the proposal has been out there since May 2014. But you claimed it was secret.

What does that say about you?

You're a bald, faced LIAR.

The FCC chairman was even CALLED TO TESTIFY IN FRONT OF CONGRESS to tell them what was in this, AND HE IGNORED CONGRESS.

Now go fucking LIE somewhere else, JACK ASS.

eCFR Code of Federal Regulations

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2014/db0515/FCC-14-61A1.pdf

"Full of sound and fury signifying nothing"

Now that you see it are you going to put your apology in bolded caps?

 

[007]

Oh my God... are you going to play this? Did I say it DID have something to do with the FCC?

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

Now having to REPEAT myself, I SAID... "net neutrality is the ACA for the internet," MEANING, that now the government can REGULATE, HOW, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY... WHATEVER THEY WANT about the internet, JUST LIKE THE ACA CAN REGULATE HEALTH CARE, and if you think that they won't do it with PREJUDICE, then you need your head examined, brother. That's why I said "THINK."

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

That's seven.

Yup, seven times it has been explained to you and you played ignorant.

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?

I got no answers. All I get is

. Doesn't impress me.

Eight.

That's just incredibly dumb to think that's not what this is all about, and that they won't.

Why else do you think George Soros pumped $196,000,000.00 into getting this rammed though? You think he wants FREE SPEECH? Seriously, you can't be that ignorant. The entire WORLD knows Soros is all about.

 

[007]

Keep in mind that anything Republicans are 'for' is bad for the working class.

That's just stupid, and nothing more than leftist, progtard hack bull shit and dumbfuckery.... which is what we expect from you.

 

[Stephanie]

Call your worthless Congresspeople for all it's worth

They have let themselves become nothing but show stooges. and I vote they all (Dem/rep/socialist/commies) just go find another circus to join. WHY ARE WE PAYING them?

 

[ClosedCaption]

There's ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY SIX MILLION DOLLARS of GEORGE SOROS MONEY behind the OBAMA FORCED, DONE IN SECRET, OBAMA FORCED internet take over.

WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?

"NET NEUTRALITY?" You've GOT to be fucking JOKING!

Except it wasnt done in secret the proposal has been out there since May 2014. But you claimed it was secret.

What does that say about you?

You're a bald, faced LIAR.

The FCC chairman was even CALLED TO TESTIFY IN FRONT OF CONGRESS to tell them what was in this, AND HE IGNORED CONGRESS.

Now go fucking LIE somewhere else, JACK ASS.

eCFR Code of Federal Regulations

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2014/db0515/FCC-14-61A1.pdf

"Full of sound and fury signifying nothing"

Now that you see it are you going to put your apology in bolded caps?

I'm waiting for my apology in big bolded "hair on fire" font. Did you see it says May 2014? Much Secret huh?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?.

Who do you think determines what can be shown on television or what can be played on the radio. Where do you think the movie rating system comes from, G, PG, PG-13, R?

 

[RDD_1210]

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?.

Who do you think determines what can be shown on television or what can be played on the radio. Where do you think the movie rating system comes from, G, PG, PG-13, R?

Yup, thats it. Obama is going to censor conservative websites.

Solid analysis.

 

[Pogo]

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?.

Who do you think determines what can be shown on television or what can be played on the radio. Where do you think the movie rating system comes from, G, PG, PG-13, R?

Did you really post that?

Operators of television and radio stations determine what "can" be played. Or rather, what "will" be played. The FCC has no hand in that. Never has.

And movies? Really dood? The FCC has absolutely zero to do with movies. The ratings come from the MPAA -- the movie industry itself.

Oh that was baaaad.

I think that's nine.

 

[Pogo]

No, the OP did. That's the question he can't answer.

FCC is not "da gubmint".
And it has never censored anything. So I'm still looking for the basis of this speculation.

OK... whatever... I never knew you you were dense, or such a leftist hack, sorry.

Enjoy your apathy.

That's seven.

Yup, seven times it has been explained to you and you played ignorant.

I'm simply asking where in any of this is any indication of "censorship"; where has the FCC ever censored anything; and how is FCC -- which is a creation of Congress itself -- "circumventing" Congress?

I got no answers. All I get is

. Doesn't impress me.

Eight.

That's just incredibly dumb to think that's not what this is all about, and that they won't.

Why else do you think George Soros pumped $196,000,000.00 into getting this rammed though? You think he wants FREE SPEECH? Seriously, you can't be that ignorant. The entire WORLD knows Soros is all about.

"Everybody knows" (argumentum ad populum) fallacy, coupled with speculation fallacy as a delicious chewy caramel center.

Didn't see this before -- it makes ten.

 

[OnePercenter]

Keep in mind that anything Republicans are 'for' is bad for the working class.

That's just stupid, and nothing more than leftist, progtard hack bull shit and dumbfuckery.... which is what we expect from you.

Except you can't post one program authored by Republicans that benefits the working class.

 

[g5000]

Blaaaaarggggggghhhh...

There is so much bloviation on both sides of this issue.

Here's the thing. I don't know if you guys know this, but the internet has had a "net neutrality" rule in effect for something like the past 15 years. Net neutrality is not some new beast, and the world didn't end with it.

However, an appeals court struck down the last net neutrality rule, stating the FCC did not have the authority to make such a rule. The FCC makes a net neutrality rule, someone (Verizon) challenges it, the courts strike the rule down. Rinse, repeat.

So now the FCC is classifying the internet as a utility, and this will give it the authority it needs to make net neutrality rules.

However, as a regulator of a utility, this also gives the FCC a whole new range of regulatory powers over the internet far in excess of just ruling on net neutrality. This reclassification means they can now set prices, for example.

This is extreme overkill. A huge government power expansion. And the government never fails to exercise the powers it gives itself. With these new powers it has given itself over the internet, the FCC is not going to stop at net neutrality.

And now big money is going to be capturing that regulatory power.

Here's another thing. "Net neutrality" is actually a bandwidth issue. Internet Service Providers want to be able to control which web sites get faster speeds due to the current limitations in bandwidth.

Key word: current.

Technology is going to solve this problem, not the government.

And the government just grabbed a shit ton of power that far exceeds the ability to regulate "net neutrality".

So long after technology has made the net neutrality issue obsolete, the government will retain today's new powers.

Bogus.

Bogus, bogus, bogus.