“Dictator” Trump Forcefully Re-Affirms First Amendment Free Speech in Historic Manifesto, Outlaws Government Censorship

To be a dictator, wouldnt TRUMP be using the government to censor the left?

HE IS GOING TO OUTLAW GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP.

Weird for a DICTATOR, huh?
 
To be a dictator, wouldnt TRUMP be using the government to censor the left?

HE IS GOING TO OUTLAW GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP.

Weird for a DICTATOR, huh?

These people are fucking nuts...

Telling them that they can't control other people is being a dictator? Fucking insane goddamned control freaks....
 

“Dictator” Trump Forcefully Re-Affirms First Amendment Free Speech in Historic Manifesto, Outlaws Government Censorship​

Is Trump going after his new best friend Elon Musk first?



X owner Elon Musk is the world’s wealthiest flag-bearer for free speech, but under his leadership the social media platform is acceding to government requests to take down or withhold user content at a significantly higher rate than it did in the years leading up to his 2022 purchase.

The site acted on 71 percent of the legal requests it received to remove content in the first half of this year, up 20 percent from the last time it reported the figure in 2021 and more than double the rate in preceding years, according to a new transparency report X published Wednesday and a Washington Post review of past disclosure data.

As in past years, most of the removal demands came from a handful of countries, including Japan, South Korea and Turkey, which have each submitted thousands of requests. Much more often than not, they have been successful in persuading Musk’s X to remove or restrict content on the platform, the data show.

The findings highlight that while Musk has decried government attempts to “censor” content and blasted X’s previous ownership for buckling to political pressure, the platform since his takeover appears to be complying with such demands even more frequently. The disclosures are consistent with past media reports finding higher government compliance rates under Musk.


 
To be a dictator, wouldnt TRUMP be using the government to censor the left?

HE IS GOING TO OUTLAW GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP.

Weird for a DICTATOR, huh?
You do realize Trump called for CBS to have their license revoked because he did not like how they edited their interview of Harris, right?

RIGHT?!?

Even though Fox deleted seven minutes of Trump's rambling response to a simple question and only left a single sentence intact.

RIGHT?!?
 
To be a dictator, wouldnt TRUMP be using the government to censor the left?

HE IS GOING TO OUTLAW GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP.

Weird for a DICTATOR, huh?
He’s the guy that called for the government to punish CBS and ABC because they weren’t nice enough to him.

That’s called censorship.
 
That's the thing about dictators. They want the opposition media shut down.

Every dictator does this. Just ask the Russian people. Just ask Alexei Navalny.
 
That's the thing about dictators. They want the opposition media shut down.

Every dictator does this. Just ask the Russian people. Just ask Alexei Navalny.
7 more paids to go for today
 
More than anything else that might happen, libs FEAR a return to honesty in media the most. Illegals and their other woke jokes are not even close
Without media creating lies for them and then providing cover, libs are sunk
So Right needs said Twice
 
You do realize Trump called for CBS to have their license revoked because he did not like how they edited their interview of Harris, right?

RIGHT?!?

Even though Fox deleted seven minutes of Trump's rambling response to a simple question and only left a single sentence intact.

RIGHT?!?

What they did violated the equal time principles.
 
You couldn't have written anything more ironic if you tried.
Thank goodness I wasn't writing ironically. I don't see how anyone can think that was ironic, it was so far from that.
 
What they did violated the equal time principles.
Ha! Trump was too scared to be interviewed and refused to go on 60 minutes.

You guys need better talking points.

Fact is Trump called for censorship.
 
Ha! Trump was too scared to be interviewed and refused to go on 60 minutes.

You guys need better talking points.

Fact is Trump called for censorship.

What Trump turned down was not an interview.
It was an ambush.... That's completely unrelated to the editing. That type of service provided by a privateer for a political campaign is a violation of campaign laws.
 
Is Trump going after his new best friend Elon Musk first?



X owner Elon Musk is the world’s wealthiest flag-bearer for free speech, but under his leadership the social media platform is acceding to government requests to take down or withhold user content at a significantly higher rate than it did in the years leading up to his 2022 purchase.

The site acted on 71 percent of the legal requests it received to remove content in the first half of this year, up 20 percent from the last time it reported the figure in 2021 and more than double the rate in preceding years, according to a new transparency report X published Wednesday and a Washington Post review of past disclosure data.

As in past years, most of the removal demands came from a handful of countries, including Japan, South Korea and Turkey, which have each submitted thousands of requests. Much more often than not, they have been successful in persuading Musk’s X to remove or restrict content on the platform, the data show.

The findings highlight that while Musk has decried government attempts to “censor” content and blasted X’s previous ownership for buckling to political pressure, the platform since his takeover appears to be complying with such demands even more frequently. The disclosures are consistent with past media reports finding higher government compliance rates under Musk.



Sounds like Musk needs the new law. Of course it's only for the US...

There are whole segments of X dedicated to FUCK TRUMP ...
I don't see anyone interfering.
 
Ha! Trump was too scared to be interviewed and refused to go on 60 minutes.

You guys need better talking points.

Fact is Trump called for censorship.
Too scared fraidy cat Trump
Speech pattern of mentally disabled OR 12 year old
 
What Trump turned down was not an interview.
It was an ambush.... That's completely unrelated to the editing. That type of service provided by a privateer for a political campaign is a violation of campaign laws.
Paranoia is a clear sign of dementia.

Still doesn’t change the fact that he called for censorship.
 
Bu bu bu I thought bad orange man was Hitler!




In a speech and policy initiative ignored by the major media, President-elect Donald Trump has outlined far-reaching legislation which prohibits government and Big Tech-run social media, an increasingly important avenue for the dissemination of news and information, from ‘censoring, limiting, categorizing, or impeding the lawful speech of American citizens.’

Trump announced his Free Speech Policy Initiative on December 15, 2022, to little notice by a media which was gleefully repeating Democratic accusations that he had “dictatorial” tendencies:

within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding with any organization, business, or person, to censor, limit, categorize, or impede the lawful speech of American citizens. I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as “mis-” or “dis-information”. And I will begin the process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship—directly or indirectly—whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health and Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are.

Trump called for Congress to:

enact new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureaucrats who partner with private entities to do an end-run around the Constitution and deprive Americans of their First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights.

Trump said:

when users of big online platforms have their content or accounts removed, throttled, shadow-banned, or otherwise restricted no matter what name they use, they should have the right to be informed that it’s happening, the right to a specific explanation of the reason why, and the right to a timely appeal.

Below: President Donald J. Trump — Free Speech Policy Initiative (View at Rumble)

In today’s Alice in Wonderland inverted political universe, examples abound of the Democratic Party showing precisely the dictatorial tendencies it accuses Trump off, such as when AOC called for more censorship this October.

This even though Democrats are the ones who have been caught in blatant lies, such as accusing Trump of saying that Neo-Nazis are “very fine people,” taking Trump’s words badly out of context. In Trump’s famous exchange with reporters after Charlottesville he said:

“they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group. But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides…

I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally – but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people, but you also had troublemakers and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats – you had a lot of bad people in the other group too.”


Nevertheless, knowing the full context, media and Democratic politicians even now continue to repeat that Trump sympathizes with Nazis.

AOC advocates for more censorship (view at Rumble)

FULL TRANSCRIPT

President Donald J. Trump — Free Speech Policy Initiative

“If we don’t have FREE SPEECH, then we just don’t have a FREE COUNTRY. It’s as simple as that. If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then the rest of our rights and liberties will topple just like dominos one by one. They’ll go down.

That’s why today, I am announcing my plan to shatter the left-wing censorship regime, and to reclaim the right to Free Speech for all Americans. And reclaim is a very important word in this case because they’ve taken it away.


In recent weeks, bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister group of Deep State bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left-wing activists, and depraved corporate news media have been conspiring to manipulate and silence the American People. They have collaborated to suppress vital information on everything from elections to public health.

The censorship cartel must be dismantled and destroyed — and it must happen immediately. And here is my plan:

FIRST, within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding with any organization, business, or person, to censor, limit, categorize, or impede the lawful speech of American citizens. I will then ban federal money from being used to label domestic speech as “mis-” or “dis-information”. And I will begin the process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has engaged in domestic censorship—directly or indirectly—whether they are the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health and Human Services, the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are.

SECOND, I will order the Department of Justice to investigate all parties involved in the new online censorship regime, which is absolutely destructive and terrible, and to aggressively prosecute any and all crimes identified. These include possible violations of federal civil rights law, campaign finance laws, federal election law, securities law, and anti-trust laws, the Hatch Act and a host of other potential criminal, civil, regulatory, and constitutional offenses. To assist in these efforts, I am urging House Republicans to immediately send preservation letters — and we have to do this right now — to the Biden administration, the Biden campaign, and every Silicon Valley tech giant, ordering them not to destroy evidence of censorship.

THIRD, upon my inauguration as president, I will ask Congress to send a bill to my desk revising Section 230 to get big online platforms out of censorship business. From now on, digital platforms should only qualify for immunity protection under Section 230 if they meet high standards of neutrality, transparency, fairness, and non-discrimination. We should require these platforms to INCREASE their efforts to take down UNLAWFUL content, such as child exploitation and promoting hadoterrorism, while dramatically curtailing their power to arbitrarily restrict lawful speech.

FOURTH, we need to break up the entire toxic censorship industry that has arisen under the false guise of tackling so-called “mis-” and “dis-information.” The federal government should immediately stop funding all non-profits and academic programs that support this authoritarian project. If any U.S. university is discovered to have engaged in censorship activities or election interferences in the past—such as flagging social media content for removal [and] blacklisting—those universities should lose federal research dollars and federal student loan support for a period of five years, and maybe more. We should also enact new laws laying out clear criminal penalties for federal bureaucrats who partner with private entities to do an end-run around the Constitution and deprive Americans of their First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights. In other words, deprive them of their vote. And once you lose those elections and once you lose your borders like we have, you no longer have a country. Furthermore, to confront the problems of major platforms being infiltrated by legions of former Deep Staters and intelligence officials, there should be a 7-year cooling-off period before any employee of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DNI, DHS, or DOD is allowed to take a job at a company possessing vast quantities of U.S. user data.

FIFTH, the time has finally come for Congress to pass a digital Bill of Rights. This should include a right to digital due process—in other words, government officials should need a COURT ORDER to take down online content, not send information requests such as the FBI was sending to Twitter.

Furthermore, when users of big online platforms have their content or accounts removed, throttled, shadow-banned, or otherwise restricted no matter what name they use, they should have the right to be informed that it’s happening, the right to a specific explanation of the reason why, and the right to a timely appeal. In addition, all users over the age of 18 should have the right to opt-out of content moderation and curation entirely, and receive an unmanipulated stream of information if they so choose.

The fight for Free Speech is a matter of victory or death for America—and for the survival of Western Civilization itself. When I am President, this whole rotten system of censorship and information control will be ripped out of the system at large. There won’t be anything left.

By restoring free speech, we will begin to reclaim our democracy, and save our nation. Thank you, and God Bless America
.”

/—-/ Normally, I look forward to Christmas and New Yeas, but I wish we could fast forward to Jan 20, 2025.
 
Back
Top Bottom