Don't Ever Forget What Kamala Harris Did

[pknopp]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

So why didn't she bail out those who rioted in 2015-2016?
She was weaponising the BLM riots to overthrow Trump. Sedition, I bleieve it's called.

I answered this already. She's a major hypocrite but I'm not going to condemn her if she helped out the protesters.

I'm never going to personally support her but if she wants to support what I support, well, OK.

 

[hadit]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2015.........32
Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2020..........10.
Wow, who was in power in 2015??

 

[MadDog]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

Impeached means nothing now. dems trivialised it.
Nobody in Team Trump gives a shit.

Is there anyone left on Trump’s team? And after stiffing Giuliani, do you think an defense lawyers are anxious to join (unless he pays in advance).

 

[irosie91]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

So why didn't she bail out those who rioted in 2015-2016?
She was weaponising the BLM riots to overthrow Trump. Sedition, I bleieve it's called.

You obviously don’t know what sedition means.

I do know what sedition is----its filthy, bloody name is BLM

 

[conserveguy877]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

House impeachment means nothing at this point. But I guess it's something to brag about?

I told you he’d be impeached. You said I was wrong . I told you so.

Again, House impeachment charades mean nothing. Is he still at the White House finishing his first term?

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

Impeached means nothing now. dems trivialised it.
Nobody in Team Trump gives a shit.

Is there anyone left on Trump’s team? And after stiffing Giuliani, do you think an defense lawyers are anxious to join (unless he pays in advance).

He got more legal votes than any President in history.
That's Team Trump.

 

[pknopp]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

 

[MadDog]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

So why didn't she bail out those who rioted in 2015-2016?
She was weaponising the BLM riots to overthrow Trump. Sedition, I bleieve it's called.

You obviously don’t know what sedition means.

I do know what sedition is----its filthy, bloody name is BLM

So what dictionary offers that as the definition of sedition? Or did you just make it up for another rant.

 

[22lcidw]

She also sucked Willie Brown's dick to get a job...

It was her vaccine. Jit bag Joe given his unity speech with the masks...bwhahhaa! People should spread it on purpose.

 

[irosie91]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

So why didn't she bail out those who rioted in 2015-2016?
She was weaponising the BLM riots to overthrow Trump. Sedition, I bleieve it's called.

You obviously don’t know what sedition means.

I do know what sedition is----its filthy, bloody name is BLM

So what dictionary offers that as the definition of sedition? Or did you just make it up for another rant.

Webster

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

So why didn't she bail out those who rioted in 2015-2016?
She was weaponising the BLM riots to overthrow Trump. Sedition, I bleieve it's called.

You obviously don’t know what sedition means.

I do know what sedition is----its filthy, bloody name is BLM

So what dictionary offers that as the definition of sedition? Or did you just make it up for another rant.

I just made it up, like you people describe what happened in Washington.

 

[hadit]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Far from it. The protests of 60 years ago were about being legally forced to use separate facilities, about being legally forced into being second class citizens, about being legally kept out of jobs, made to ride in the back of the bus, etc. etc. The protests this year were about unequal treatment at the hands of the police. IOW, there's been a lot of progress made already, or do you honestly believe Obama would have had a prayer to become president in the 60's?

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Bullshit.
A thug swallowed a bag of drugs and died. He's turned into a Saint, and (mainly white, middle class kids) riot for 200 nights.

 

[MadDog]

Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2015.........32
Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2020..........10.
Wow, who was in power in 2015??

I believe you’re mistaken. Apparently the count for 2020 are considerably higher than that. And it will probably be higher than that eventually since death stats aren’t tabulated in real time. The lag can possibly be several months.

People shot to death by U.S. police, by race 2024 | Statista

The trend of fatal police shootings in the U.S. seems to only be increasing each year, with 1,097 civilians, 225 of whom were Black, killed by police in 2022.

www.statista.com

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

A white man is 20 times more likely to be killed by a black man than vice versa.
A white woman is 200 times more likely to be raped by a black man, than a black woman raped by a white man.
Yeah, just like 60 years ago. Sure.

 

[MadDog]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Bullshit.
A thug swallowed a bag of drugs and died. He's turned into a Saint, and (mainly white, middle class kids) riot for 200 nights.

I must have missed that incident. Do you have a link?

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2015.........32
Number of unarmed blacks shot dead by cops in 2020..........10.
Wow, who was in power in 2015??

I believe you’re mistaken. Apparently the count for 2020 are considerably higher than that. And it will probably be higher than that eventually since death stats aren’t tabulated in real time. The lag can possibly be several months.

People shot to death by U.S. police, by race 2024 | Statista

The trend of fatal police shootings in the U.S. seems to only be increasing each year, with 1,097 civilians, 225 of whom were Black, killed by police in 2022.

www.statista.com

I specifically mentioned unarmed blacks. It was 32 in 2015, and as of November 2020 it was around 10 in 2020..
More blacks die falling out of bed than being shot unarmed by cops.

 

[irosie91]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Far from it. The protests of 60 years ago were about being legally forced to use separate facilities, about being legally forced into being second class citizens, about being legally kept out of jobs, made to ride in the back of the bus, etc. etc. The protests this year were about unequal treatment at the hands of the police. IOW, there's been a lot of progress made already, or do you honestly believe Obama would have had a prayer to become president in the 60's?

lots and lots of people would not have had a chance
in the 50's and 60's----JFK almost did not ----Ramesh
Singh would not have a chance

 

[pknopp]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Far from it. The protests of 60 years ago were about being legally forced to use separate facilities, about being legally forced into being second class citizens, about being legally kept out of jobs, made to ride in the back of the bus, etc. etc. The protests this year were about unequal treatment at the hands of the police. IOW, there's been a lot of progress made already, or do you honestly believe Obama would have had a prayer to become president in the 60's?

Obama forgot all about the works of those who came before him as president. He had the opportunity to transform the country and stayed on the sidelines.

He made a big deal about taking over the Eric Garner prosecution and then did nothing. He left it for Trump to deal with.

Screw Obama.