Mr. Friscus
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2020
- 5,930
- 6,272
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #101
Did she break the law?
No, but nor did Trump.
Unless he's being arrested..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did she break the law?
And what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
Why do you think the 2nd Amendment was created? For hunting?
By that logic, you should be in full support of the Capitol Riots.
It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
Tulsi Gabbard eviscerated her on her record as a prosecutor against African Americans. It was all over the news. Maybe if you read books instead of burning them you would be better informed?No, that came out of conservative media -- I don't recall anyone on the debate stage calling her "Fake black"That came out of the Democrat party debates. Blaming Trump for that too? Sad.But I thought she was a fake black woman who was so racist against black people that she put 48828727 of them in prison....
Remember all of the Kamala Is A Cop memes??
Now just like that, she is an anarchist mastermind?? Cool!
and as for her record as attorney general -- none of it showed that she is some radical anarchist anti-police terrorist like you dic suckers are trying to make her...
But Trumpers are not know for having coherent arguments...just desperate flailing like the hurt bitches they are
Enjoy your medal
It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
Were they just protesting you'd have a point.
Can you show us a post where you CONDEMNED Commie Harris on this?No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.
Your ability to think is pretty lacking.
I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?
That's how principles are rewarded in the Demon PartyAnd look where they are now. Gabbard couldn't be elected to clean the toilets in her home state and Harris is VP
Can you show us a post where you CONDEMNED Commie Harris on this?No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.
Your ability to think is pretty lacking.
I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?
Or do you only say this NOW after being challenged?
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.
That's how principles are rewarded in the Demon PartyAnd look where they are now. Gabbard couldn't be elected to clean the toilets in her home state and Harris is VP
EXACTLY. This is why you have no credibility in this argument.Can you show us a post where you CONDEMNED Commie Harris on this?No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.
Your ability to think is pretty lacking.
I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?
Or do you only say this NOW after being challenged?
On what? Arguing to help bail people out? I didn't and don't condemn that.
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
EXACTLY. This is why you have no credibility in this argument.Can you show us a post where you CONDEMNED Commie Harris on this?No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.
Your ability to think is pretty lacking.
I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?
Or do you only say this NOW after being challenged?
On what? Arguing to help bail people out? I didn't and don't condemn that.
THE SOON TO BE VP HAS BAILED OUT KNOWN CRIMINALS AND YOU DO NOT CONDEMN THAT
Regardless of who signed what, the fact cannot be altered that the Pennsylvania constitution stated its election rules, yet these rules were changed 3 weeks prior to election. We are either a nation that follows the laws on the books (including states following their own state constitution) or we ignore laws on the books to pick and choose which ones we don’t want to follow at election time. Three weeks.... good grief.Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.
There was due process. The REPUBLICAN Senator from Pennsylvania correctly argued why there was.
The election rules were changed in a bi-partisan manner. The Republican governor signed them. No one said a word until Trump lost. Anyone could have sued at any point.
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
So how does a 50" TV stolen from best buy reform our justice system?
Please go into detail.
Regardless of who signed what, the fact cannot be altered that the Pennsylvania constitution stated its election rules, yet these rules were changed 3 weeks prior to election. We are either a nation that follows the laws on the books (including states following their own state constitution) or we ignore laws on the books to pick and choose which ones we don’t want to follow at election time. Three weeks.... good grief.Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.
There was due process. The REPUBLICAN Senator from Pennsylvania correctly argued why there was.
The election rules were changed in a bi-partisan manner. The Republican governor signed them. No one said a word until Trump lost. Anyone could have sued at any point.
Sorry, but you can't change a fox by donning him with a pigskin.One and two have nothing in common as far as intent and political planning to keep someone in power who had zero proof of his false claims to overthrow a legal election. Versus a riot over police brutality.
Of course they do, you just can't answer without being blatantly hypocritical, so you're bailing.
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
So how does a 50" TV stolen from best buy reform our justice system?
Please go into detail.
The violence worked, didn't it? I don't need any more detail than that.
Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.
That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.
So how does a 50" TV stolen from best buy reform our justice system?
Please go into detail.
The violence worked, didn't it? I don't need any more detail than that.
Please define "worked."
And use detail. What came about that benefitted blacks from their violence? Be specific.