Don't Ever Forget What Kamala Harris Did

[Foreigner Looking In.]

If Joe wanted to destroy, Trump's legacy, he could have encouraged a 2-3 day audit of votes in the contested States.
Thats what a real leader would do, But he didn't. Now we're stuck with 4 years of division and a cloud of doubt over the whole legitimacy over the POTUS

Joe didn't have to do that, the courts did.

Joe could have supported the call. That would have alleviated people's doubts. Calmed tension. He didn't.
Mainly because he knew there was massive fraud.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Far from it. The protests of 60 years ago were about being legally forced to use separate facilities, about being legally forced into being second class citizens, about being legally kept out of jobs, made to ride in the back of the bus, etc. etc. The protests this year were about unequal treatment at the hands of the police. IOW, there's been a lot of progress made already, or do you honestly believe Obama would have had a prayer to become president in the 60's?

Obama forgot all about the works of those who came before him as president. He had the opportunity to transform the country and stayed on the sidelines.

He made a big deal about taking over the Eric Garner prosecution and then did nothing. He left it for Trump to deal with.

Screw Obama.

Okaaaaay, but that doesn't address what I said. You said the protests were about the same thing that they were 60 years ago and I pointed out that you are wrong. Are you going to admit that you are wrong or persist?

It's all the same. Racism.

Most hate crime is black on white.

I used to work with an older black man. He told me he was racist. I told him I found that to be counter productive and not helping.

He then told me about how it was his daughter than integrated the local school system. She was in elementary school. He would go to the school every day to have lunch with her because none of the other kids would and he would hear the names they called her.

He told me that was something he would never be able to get over. I understood.

Most hate crime has not been black on white. Some things which are crimes are not prosecuted.

Wow. Touching.
I've been sucker punched and beaten up by a gang of blacks and called racial slurs as it happened.
A close friend was raped by one.
Spare me.

No you weren't.

Nice talking to you. You're gone.

 

[MadDog]

If Joe wanted to destroy, Trump's legacy, he could have encouraged a 2-3 day audit of votes in the contested States.
Thats what a real leader would do, But he didn't. Now we're stuck with 4 years of division and a cloud of doubt over the whole legitimacy over the POTUS

There have been audits in Georgia and Wisconsin. Explanation and results of the statewide Georgia Audit is available online at the Georgia Secretary of State’s website. I haven’t looked specifically at the Wisconsin audit results but I do know that the counties audited were specifically selected by Republicans, not Democrats. The state of Wisconsin, by law, conducts an audit after each election.

in fact, most states conduct post-election audit after every election. This one is no different.

 

[OldLady]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

Impeached means nothing now. dems trivialised it.
Nobody in Team Trump gives a shit.

I hope it's another hundred years before Congress has to use it again. This time, we had to; first time--could have been left to slide after their investigation, making sure all the information came out. Give him a censure. Same with Clinton. Nixon had committed actual crimes, so yeah, he had to be impeached. No idea about Johnson; I was only a kid at the time.

 

[Flash]

Everybody is trying to cover it up but we can't forget that the Democrats stole the 2020 Presidential and the Georgia Senate elections by the scam of unverified mail in ballots in the swing Democrat controlled districts.

The refusal to allow an audit is an admission of guilt.

If they had nothing to lose they would welcome the audit but we all know they were scared shitless of a real audit and that is why China Joe will never be a legitimate President.

Shame on Pence for going to the inauguration!

 

[MadDog]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

Impeached means nothing now. dems trivialised it.
Nobody in Team Trump gives a shit.

I hope it's another hundred years before Congress has to use it again. This time, we had to; first time--could have been left to slide after their investigation, making sure all the information came out. Give him a censure. Same with Clinton. Nixon had committed actual crimes, so yeah, he had to be impeached. No idea about Johnson; I was only a kid at the time.

i doubt you were a kid when Andrew Johnson was impeached. That was in the late 1860’s.

 

[Flash]

Do you have a receipt of her donation?
Because all that she did was support it with a word or two..

1. Do you support her support of the organization? or do you not think it's a big deal?
2. Would you support or not care if Trump supported an organization that tried to bail out these Capitol protesters?

Trump already said he would bail out any of his supporters that knock the crap out of Protesters at his rallies, so he can probably just bail out his Power Boys and not ask for donations.

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Protests are legal when they are peaceful. There’s nothing peaceful about thugs who steal from others and vandalize their property.
So you support criminal activity and thug-like behavior because they are pro left is that what you are saying? Yikes.

I'm not stuttering. I support what they were protesting. I understand that when peaceful protest is ignored, the next step is violent protest.

It worked.

Violent acts create a great deal of negative blowback. Non violent acts of civil disobedience will garner broader support in the long run.

People want people to behave so they can ignore them.

Define "behave". There is violent behavior and there is non-violent disobedient behavior. A sit-in at a lunch counter is non-violent civil disobedience. It gets the point across, cannot be ignored, but no one needs to be hurt and nothing needs to be destroyed. IOW, there are effective means of protest that do not involve violence, which only hardens opposition.

Are you denying that there was violence after the sit ins? The dogs and the water hoses didn't come out?

People tried to peacefully protest. Trump called them SOB's and said they should be fired. Pence turned his back on them. Reforms happened after the violence.

Of course there was violence, and who committed it, the protestors or those who reacted to them? See, that's how you gain sympathy for your cause, you don't do anything wrong, and when the reaction is over-reaction, people don't like it. And reforms DID happen, because people didn't like seeing non-violent people getting blasted with hoses or chased by dogs. Had the protestors gone in smashing windows, burning buildings and assaulting innocent bystanders, many would have found themselves at the end of a rope. Not today, though. Today they get encouraged by the authorities and left alone to do whatever they want.

60 years later and the protests were still over the same things. Enough.

Far from it. The protests of 60 years ago were about being legally forced to use separate facilities, about being legally forced into being second class citizens, about being legally kept out of jobs, made to ride in the back of the bus, etc. etc. The protests this year were about unequal treatment at the hands of the police. IOW, there's been a lot of progress made already, or do you honestly believe Obama would have had a prayer to become president in the 60's?

Obama forgot all about the works of those who came before him as president. He had the opportunity to transform the country and stayed on the sidelines.

He made a big deal about taking over the Eric Garner prosecution and then did nothing. He left it for Trump to deal with.

Screw Obama.

Okaaaaay, but that doesn't address what I said. You said the protests were about the same thing that they were 60 years ago and I pointed out that you are wrong. Are you going to admit that you are wrong or persist?

It's all the same. Racism.

Most hate crime is black on white.

Most violent crime is Black on Black or Black on White.

 

[Yarddog]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.

That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.

Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.

There was due process. The REPUBLICAN Senator from Pennsylvania correctly argued why there was.

The election rules were changed in a bi-partisan manner. The Republican governor signed them. No one said a word until Trump lost. Anyone could have sued at any point.

Regardless of who signed what, the fact cannot be altered that the Pennsylvania constitution stated its election rules, yet these rules were changed 3 weeks prior to election. We are either a nation that follows the laws on the books (including states following their own state constitution) or we ignore laws on the books to pick and choose which ones we don’t want to follow at election time. Three weeks.... good grief.

The elections rules were changed long before the election. You can make up whatever you want.

How long is "long before the election"?

In Michigan they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED during the summer and fall.
November 3rd is the fall.

Wr ALL understand WHY they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED (without the state legislatures)

You can claim anything you want. The courts have been completely involved and have dismissed everything. Even Trump appointed judges.

You believe state governors and Secretary of State have the right to make law? Or operate outside of the law?

You believe courts have the right to side with far left governors to make state legislators non essential to government?

Trump appointed judges all threw the cases out. Trump judges on the Supreme Court rejected him. Trump lost.

that doesn't take away the right of Americans to have a problem with these actions and protest.
Especially if we feel these actions have diminished our votes. The fact that Judges threw cases out means nothing in that respect. Judges can also feel intimidated and take the easiest less painful route.

 

[MadDog]

Everybody is trying to cover it up but we can't forget that the Democrats stole the 2020 Presidential and the Georgia Senate elections by the scam of unverified mail in ballots in the swing Democrat controlled districts.

The refusal to allow an audit is an admission of guilt.

If they had nothing to lose they would welcome the audit but we all know they were scared shitless of a real audit and that is why China Joe will never be a legitimate President.

Shame on Pence for going to the inauguration!

Well, you get your wish. Most states conduct an audit after each election. Georgia and Wisconsin already have. I don’t know the status of some of the others.

Besides, what’s the point of another audit. Screamers like you would never accept a results that doesn’t fit your narrative.

 

[OldLady]

It sucks, but the Fake News and swamp democrats are good at looking the other way at things like this. Sad!

Even Fox News has said Trump was impeached. I told you so.

Trump impeached by House over Capitol riots, becomes first president to face rebuke twice

The House of Representatives Wednesday made history by voting to impeach President Trump for a second time in his presidency.

www.foxnews.com

Impeached means nothing now. dems trivialised it.
Nobody in Team Trump gives a shit.

I hope it's another hundred years before Congress has to use it again. This time, we had to; first time--could have been left to slide after their investigation, making sure all the information came out. Give him a censure. Same with Clinton. Nixon had committed actual crimes, so yeah, he had to be impeached. No idea about Johnson; I was only a kid at the time.

i doubt you were a kid when Andrew Johnson was impeached. That was in the late 1860’s.

It was a joke.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Judges can also feel intimidated and take the easiest less painful route.

Shamefully, this is EXACTLY what happened

 

[OldLady]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.

That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.

Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.

There was due process. The REPUBLICAN Senator from Pennsylvania correctly argued why there was.

The election rules were changed in a bi-partisan manner. The Republican governor signed them. No one said a word until Trump lost. Anyone could have sued at any point.

Regardless of who signed what, the fact cannot be altered that the Pennsylvania constitution stated its election rules, yet these rules were changed 3 weeks prior to election. We are either a nation that follows the laws on the books (including states following their own state constitution) or we ignore laws on the books to pick and choose which ones we don’t want to follow at election time. Three weeks.... good grief.

The elections rules were changed long before the election. You can make up whatever you want.

How long is "long before the election"?

In Michigan they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED during the summer and fall.
November 3rd is the fall.

Wr ALL understand WHY they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED (without the state legislatures)

You can claim anything you want. The courts have been completely involved and have dismissed everything. Even Trump appointed judges.

You believe state governors and Secretary of State have the right to make law? Or operate outside of the law?

You believe courts have the right to side with far left governors to make state legislators non essential to government?

Trump appointed judges all threw the cases out. Trump judges on the Supreme Court rejected him. Trump lost.

that doesn't take away the right of Americans to have a problem with these actions and protest.
Especially if we feel these actions have diminished our votes. The fact that Judges threw cases out means nothing in that respect. Judges can also feel intimidated and take the easiest less painful route.

So focus on making sure YOUR state's voting laws and rules make the vote secure. If everyone did that, there would be no huge question of fraud next time.

 

[pknopp]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Protest is one thing, commit acts of violence and destruction is another. No one was arrested for peacefully protesting.

That's the cost of fighting against a fair justice system.

Without a fair election system you wont end up with a fair justice system. People also have the right to protest the fact that election rules were changed without due process in the respective states. Not violence, but protest.

There was due process. The REPUBLICAN Senator from Pennsylvania correctly argued why there was.

The election rules were changed in a bi-partisan manner. The Republican governor signed them. No one said a word until Trump lost. Anyone could have sued at any point.

Regardless of who signed what, the fact cannot be altered that the Pennsylvania constitution stated its election rules, yet these rules were changed 3 weeks prior to election. We are either a nation that follows the laws on the books (including states following their own state constitution) or we ignore laws on the books to pick and choose which ones we don’t want to follow at election time. Three weeks.... good grief.

The elections rules were changed long before the election. You can make up whatever you want.

How long is "long before the election"?

In Michigan they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED during the summer and fall.
November 3rd is the fall.

Wr ALL understand WHY they were ILLEGALLY CHANGED (without the state legislatures)

You can claim anything you want. The courts have been completely involved and have dismissed everything. Even Trump appointed judges.

You believe state governors and Secretary of State have the right to make law? Or operate outside of the law?

You believe courts have the right to side with far left governors to make state legislators non essential to government?

Trump appointed judges all threw the cases out. Trump judges on the Supreme Court rejected him. Trump lost.

that doesn't take away the right of Americans to have a problem with these actions and protest.
Especially if we feel these actions have diminished our votes. The fact that Judges threw cases out means nothing in that respect. Judges can also feel intimidated and take the easiest less painful route.

You can feel however you want.

 

[Foreigner Looking In.]

If Joe wanted to destroy, Trump's legacy, he could have encouraged a 2-3 day audit of votes in the contested States.
Thats what a real leader would do, But he didn't. Now we're stuck with 4 years of division and a cloud of doubt over the whole legitimacy over the POTUS

There have been audits in Georgia and Wisconsin. Explanation and results of the statewide Georgia Audit is available online at the Georgia Secretary of State’s website. I haven’t looked specifically at the Wisconsin audit results but I do know that the counties audited were specifically selected by Republicans, not Democrats. The state of Wisconsin, by law, conducts an audit after each election.

in fact, most states conduct post-election audit after every election. This one is no different.

You do know the difference between a recount and an audit.
Link to the audits you mention.
Were Republican observers allowed to witness this "audit". Why the media blackout.

 

[pknopp]

If Joe wanted to destroy, Trump's legacy, he could have encouraged a 2-3 day audit of votes in the contested States.
Thats what a real leader would do, But he didn't. Now we're stuck with 4 years of division and a cloud of doubt over the whole legitimacy over the POTUS

There have been audits in Georgia and Wisconsin. Explanation and results of the statewide Georgia Audit is available online at the Georgia Secretary of State’s website. I haven’t looked specifically at the Wisconsin audit results but I do know that the counties audited were specifically selected by Republicans, not Democrats. The state of Wisconsin, by law, conducts an audit after each election.

in fact, most states conduct post-election audit after every election. This one is no different.

You do know the difference between a recount and an audit.
Link to the audits you mention.
Were Republican observers allowed to witness this "audit". Why the media blackout.

Historic First Statewide Audit Of Paper Ballots Upholds Result Of Presidential Race | Elections

.

 

[Flash]

Don't forget that the Chinese bastards have killed two million people (maybe more) to get their man in the White House.

Great scam. Unleash a virus that causes a world wide pandemic that destroys Trump's great economy and gives the Democrats the opportunity to steal the election through unverified mail in ballots counted in Democrat swing districts.

Well, at least Trump will not be around to get America good trade deals. We will get the trade deals with China that China wants because their man in the White House owes them. Hunter Biden had a big cocaine bill and it wasn't going to pay itself.

 

[MadDog]

Don't forget that the Chinese bastards have killed two million people (maybe more) to get their man in the White House.

Great scam. Unleash a virus that causes a world wide pandemic that destroys Trump's great economy and gives the Democrats the opportunity to steal the election through unverified mail in ballots counted in Democrat swing districts.

Well, at least Trump will not be around to get America good trade deals. We will get the trade deals with China that China wants because their man in the White House owes them. Hunter Biden had a big cocaine bill and it wasn't going to pay itself.

You’re obviously QAnon. Enough said.

just wondering though. Trump said China wanted him to win. Are you telling us now that Trump lied?

 

[MadDog]

Don't forget that the Chinese bastards have killed two million people (maybe more) to get their man in the White House.

Great scam. Unleash a virus that causes a world wide pandemic that destroys Trump's great economy and gives the Democrats the opportunity to steal the election through unverified mail in ballots counted in Democrat swing districts.

Well, at least Trump will not be around to get America good trade deals. We will get the trade deals with China that China wants because their man in the White House owes them. Hunter Biden had a big cocaine bill and it wasn't going to pay itself.

You’re obviously QAnon. Enough said.

If Joe wanted to destroy, Trump's legacy, he could have encouraged a 2-3 day audit of votes in the contested States.
Thats what a real leader would do, But he didn't. Now we're stuck with 4 years of division and a cloud of doubt over the whole legitimacy over the POTUS

There have been audits in Georgia and Wisconsin. Explanation and results of the statewide Georgia Audit is available online at the Georgia Secretary of State’s website. I haven’t looked specifically at the Wisconsin audit results but I do know that the counties audited were specifically selected by Republicans, not Democrats. The state of Wisconsin, by law, conducts an audit after each election.

in fact, most states conduct post-election audit after every election. This one is no different.

You do know the difference between a recount and an audit.
Link to the audits you mention.
Were Republican observers allowed to witness this "audit". Why the media blackout.

Yes, I’m aware of the difference. I’ve been auditor in the past.

Historic First Statewide Audit Of Paper Ballots Upholds Result Of Presidential Race | Elections

There were no blackouts. I saw reports of BOTH recounts and the auditor as they were being conducted.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

It's one of the few things in her entire life that I support. You act like people should be embarrassed that she would support those who were arrested for protesting for a just, justice system. Hardly, the anger should be towards those who fight against that.

Curious, would you support Trump if he bailed out these Capitol rioters?

Here's your chance to be consistent.

No. You are unable to use basic common sense. I don't support what these people protested over so why would I support Trump bailing them out? I support what the others protested over.

Your ability to think is pretty lacking.

I can be consistent only if I support things I don't support? Does that really somehow make sense to you?

Yes., you support violence, looting and burning when is suits your agenda. That some strong common sense you have there.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

But I thought she was a fake black woman who was so racist against black people that she put 48828727 of them in prison....

Remember all of the Kamala Is A Cop memes??

Now just like that, she is an anarchist mastermind?? Cool!

That came out of the Democrat party debates. Blaming Trump for that too? Sad.

No, that came out of conservative media -- I don't recall anyone on the debate stage calling her "Fake black"

and as for her record as attorney general -- none of it showed that she is some radical anarchist anti-police terrorist like you dic suckers are trying to make her...

But Trumpers are not know for having coherent arguments...just desperate flailing like the hurt bitches they are

Tulsi Gabbard eviscerated her on her record as a prosecutor against African Americans. It was all over the news. Maybe if you read books instead of burning them you would be better informed?

Enjoy your medal


View attachment 443265

So in other words, nothing in her record says anything about her being some anti-cop black panther style radical anarchist??

Got it!

Again this came out from your own party. LOL. Are you just trolling now?

So again....this means Kamala isn't some radical black panther style anti-cop crusader then right??

And why do you goofy muthafuckas aint like an AG who prosecutes black defendants is such a horror??

You probably mad that she didnt put even more in there

Please employ an interpreter for future posts.
Thank you.