Ok, I read about half of that, but I get the idea.
First…daily kos…which is just a far left site, of course they are going to believe the country is a democracy…they know they have a statistical majority so they favor “majority rules”. I bet, however, if the repubs had the majority, that article would have been written quite differently.
Now, the cotus says that we are promised a “republican form of government”, article 4 section 4. Now, you are disagreeing with the term “republican”. I’ve always been of the understanding that we have a democratically elected republic, meaning, the “democracy begins and ends at the ballot box”. Our leaders are democratically elected, but operate under a republican form. In other words, we elect people (democratically) and bestow them power to operate on our behalf, but the power ultimately should be with the people (republic).
Now, the left typically wants a majority rule, because obviously that favors them, but, our system of government was set up so that everyone has a say, in the form of the electoral college. I mean, it would seem that the EC was set up to prevent the “majority rule” of a nation. It allows even the small states to have weight, and some input. Otherwise, if we ran on majority rule, every state would be subject to the whims of the majority, even if they don’t live in that state.
Why should all the dems that live in cali and New York have more say about what goes on in a red state, I’ve the people who live in thsg state. With your idea, everyone in the smaller red states would get no representation and would always have to do whatever the majority wants across the country. I call that tyranny.
Also, you have to remember that the federal government was never supposed to operate as it does, which is why we have so many disagreements as to how it should operate. Remember, the cotus specifies specific things the federal government is supposed to do, everything else is supposed to be with the states, and the people. If we stuck to that, there wouldn’t even need to be having this discussion.
The states are supposed to directly elect their leaders to represent those people of that state, but the EC is used to elect the leaders of the nation….in other words, when it comes to who’s going to lead the nation, everyone gets a say, not just the majority.
I know the left would love a true democracy, because that means they would hold power 99% of the time, and the rest of the people would always be under a form of government they disagree with.
Do you think this country would be in a good place if the government was held permanently by democrats?