shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 45,149
- 44,214
- 3,605
Look at the images of these people and ask yourself "are these the people concerned with the future of America, your democracy and your youths future"?
There can be no greater example of the problems in the U.S than ALL of the Dems, plus these four to vote against an exceptionally popular SAVE Act. Popular with voters of all stripes.
Tell me what could someone possibly argue their logic is for such a vote? Who are they assisting? What constituents? What American Values?
To be honest, the status of these people as the most entrenched Establishment creatures voting in this way is going to do far more damage to citizens trust in elections. Essentially as bad if not worse with the lengthy process to count mail-in ballots in California.
Do these people realize the risk in the world of China sinking America?
In my opinion, and I have studied the collapse of the Soviet Unions system, the East Germans and other states which hobbled until they became insignificant in history: "if you do not get money out of politics and term limits in your congress the chances of America remaining in their position within 50 years is slim".
I try to be objective. Honest and truthfully as I can be, sometimes brutally honest. This votes makes absolutely no sense to me.
\
Someone please explain to me the reason ANYONE would vote against this Act
www.foxnews.com
Four Senate Republicans broke ranks to kill another effort to pass President Donald Trump's marquee voter ID and election integrity legislation as the GOP marches to fund immigration enforcement.
Just like last time, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Thom Tills, R-N.C., joined all Democrats to thwart the move.
It’s the second attempt by Republicans to attach the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to their budget reconciliation package, and the second time that they’ve failed to get the legislation across the line months after launching a quasi-floor takeover to debate the bill.
There can be no greater example of the problems in the U.S than ALL of the Dems, plus these four to vote against an exceptionally popular SAVE Act. Popular with voters of all stripes.
Tell me what could someone possibly argue their logic is for such a vote? Who are they assisting? What constituents? What American Values?
To be honest, the status of these people as the most entrenched Establishment creatures voting in this way is going to do far more damage to citizens trust in elections. Essentially as bad if not worse with the lengthy process to count mail-in ballots in California.
Do these people realize the risk in the world of China sinking America?
In my opinion, and I have studied the collapse of the Soviet Unions system, the East Germans and other states which hobbled until they became insignificant in history: "if you do not get money out of politics and term limits in your congress the chances of America remaining in their position within 50 years is slim".
I try to be objective. Honest and truthfully as I can be, sometimes brutally honest. This votes makes absolutely no sense to me.
\
Someone please explain to me the reason ANYONE would vote against this Act
Four Senate Republicans again unite with Dems to block Trump's SAVE America Act
Four Senate Republicans joined Democrats to kill the SAVE Act voter ID amendment for a second time, blocking it from the budget reconciliation package.
Four Senate Republicans broke ranks to kill another effort to pass President Donald Trump's marquee voter ID and election integrity legislation as the GOP marches to fund immigration enforcement.
Just like last time, Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Thom Tills, R-N.C., joined all Democrats to thwart the move.
It’s the second attempt by Republicans to attach the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act to their budget reconciliation package, and the second time that they’ve failed to get the legislation across the line months after launching a quasi-floor takeover to debate the bill.