Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,870
- 33,691
- 2,300
How did he not defend the Constitution?
He was trying to stop a LEGAL election and THAT is unconstitutional
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How did he not defend the Constitution?
He was trying to stop a LEGAL election and THAT is unconstitutional
He was whining. There was nothing "legal" about it.He was challenging an election. Perfectly legal.
Whining is illegal? No evidentiary hearings. The courts did nothing.He was whining. There was nothing "legal" about it.
Legal would mean Court cases. Nope
65 court cases...only ONE insignificant one found any wrong doingWhining is illegal? No evidentiary hearings. The courts did nothing.
It was a federal election.
Sorry bout that,
1. Libtards shadow banning another thread i see.
2. They jack around with threads, putting them in other categories to kill threads.
3. Threads are assigned to the conspiracy category to go there to die.
4. Its what Libtards do.
5. I wonder which Libtard put this thread in this shit hole he created?
6. No hell no Brah!!!,....not again!!!!
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
Oh look. A conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory forumSorry bout that,
1. Libtards shadow banning another thread i see.
2. They jack around with threads, putting them in other categories to kill threads.
3. Threads are assigned to the conspiracy category to go there to die.
4. Its what Libtards do.
5. I wonder which Libtard put this thread in this shit hole he created?
6. No hell no Brah!!!,....not again!!!!
Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
No dumbass. The election was illegal.
He was challenging an election. Perfectly legal.
How is a case on the SC docket a conspiracy? The bias here is out of control. Things are not conspiracies that are simply not conspiracies. This case is not conspiracy and this thread belongs in law and justice or politics.Oh look. A conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory forum
When I read the Court doc all I saw was “no standing “How is a case on the SC docket a conspiracy? The bias here is out of control. Things are not conspiracies that are simply not conspiracies. This case is not conspiracy and this thread belongs in law and justice or politics.
No one cares what you saw. And it has standing and merit.When I read the Court doc all I saw was “no standing “
Over and over
Not according to those Court recordsNo one cares what you saw. And it has standing and merit.
There is only one court that counts now and they have not reached a decision yet, have they?Not according to those Court records
It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.
Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Guest post by Tim Canova While there has been much public attention on the U.S.www.thegatewaypundit.com