BREAKING! Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

[Lesh]

How did he not defend the Constitution?

He was trying to stop a LEGAL election and THAT is unconstitutional

 

[Lastamender]

He was challenging an election. Perfectly legal.

 

[Lesh]

He was challenging an election. Perfectly legal.

He was whining. There was nothing "legal" about it.

Legal would mean Court cases. Nope

 

[XponentialChaos]

Off to the conspiracy theory section you go.

 

[Lastamender]

He was whining. There was nothing "legal" about it.

Legal would mean Court cases. Nope

Whining is illegal? No evidentiary hearings. The courts did nothing.

 

[Lesh]

Whining is illegal? No evidentiary hearings. The courts did nothing.

65 court cases...only ONE insignificant one found any wrong doing

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Libtards shadow banning another thread i see.
2. They jack around with threads, putting them in other categories to kill threads.
3. Threads are assigned to the conspiracy category to go there to die.
4. Its what Libtards do.
5. I wonder which Libtard put this thread in this shit hole he created?
6. No hell no Brah!!!,....not again!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It was a federal election.

There is no such thing.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Sorry bout that,

1. Libtards shadow banning another thread i see.
2. They jack around with threads, putting them in other categories to kill threads.
3. Threads are assigned to the conspiracy category to go there to die.
4. Its what Libtards do.
5. I wonder which Libtard put this thread in this shit hole he created?
6. No hell no Brah!!!,....not again!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

9 pages and 168 replies, stop whining, it is no a good look for you.

 

[Lesh]

Sorry bout that,

1. Libtards shadow banning another thread i see.
2. They jack around with threads, putting them in other categories to kill threads.
3. Threads are assigned to the conspiracy category to go there to die.
4. Its what Libtards do.
5. I wonder which Libtard put this thread in this shit hole he created?
6. No hell no Brah!!!,....not again!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Oh look. A conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory forum

 

[BlindBoo]

No dumbass. The election was illegal.

He was challenging an election. Perfectly legal.

You guys are awesome. First there were 50 elections and all were perfectly legal as the Constitution gives the States the authority to determine the validity of their elections. Second, the founders did not give Congress the authority to overturn the states elections for obvious reasons. Also, each state has codified their own procedures to challenge their elections.

 

[Lastamender]

Again? Why is a case before the SC a fucking conspiracy theory? What kind of bullshit is this. Why is this a conspiracy. Let's have a fucking answer.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. How to put a great thread on the back burner, send it to conspiracy heading.
2. Even when its not.
3. Lets make it one brah!,..lol!!!!!!
4. Its basically maneuvering stories to shut them up.
5. Story Banning.
6. A form of shadow banning.
7. There is one lame libtard here, who does it daily.
8. No brah, not you again??? lol!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Road Runner]

I don't really like Trump all that much anymore, but I would much rather have him than Biden. No contest there.

 

[Lastamender]

Oh look. A conspiracy theory about the conspiracy theory forum

How is a case on the SC docket a conspiracy? The bias here is out of control. Things are not conspiracies that are simply not conspiracies. This case is not conspiracy and this thread belongs in law and justice or politics.

 

[Lesh]

How is a case on the SC docket a conspiracy? The bias here is out of control. Things are not conspiracies that are simply not conspiracies. This case is not conspiracy and this thread belongs in law and justice or politics.

When I read the Court doc all I saw was “no standing “

Over and over

 

[Lastamender]

When I read the Court doc all I saw was “no standing “

Over and over

No one cares what you saw. And it has standing and merit.

 

[Lesh]

No one cares what you saw. And it has standing and merit.

Not according to those Court records

 

[Lastamender]

Not according to those Court records

There is only one court that counts now and they have not reached a decision yet, have they?

 

[Skylar]

It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.

Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Tim Canova While there has been much public attention on the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

A case has been *filed*? Why would the media give a fiddler's fuck about a case being merely *filed*?

A monkey with a coconut, a printer and $300 can file any case.