BREAKING! Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election

[Skylar]

No one cares what you saw. And it has standing and merit.

Says who? Not the Supreme Court.

You do understand that YOU merely saying it has standing and merit has no relevance to any court ruling, yes?

 

[Lastamender]

Says who? Not the Supreme Court.

You do understand that YOU merely saying it has standing and merit has no relevance to any court ruling, yes?

Open and shut case. Those members of Congress violated their oath of office.

 

[candycorn]

So when was this supposed to happen? The testimony...when will it take place?

 

[Lastamender]

So when was this supposed to happen? The testimony...when will it take place?

Jan.6th, 2023. No testimony is needed. The vote is a matter of record.

This is not conspiracy. Why hasn't it been moved?

 

[candycorn]

Jan.6th, 2023. No testimony is needed. The vote is a matter of record.

This is not conspiracy. Why hasn't it been moved?

You're right , this thread should have been locked, trashed and burnt.

How can something be a "matter of record" if it hasn't happened yet?

Arguments are going to be heard on the 1/6/23? That would be unusual since it is a Friday.

 

[Lastamender]

You're right , this thread should have been locked, trashed and burnt.

How can something be a "matter of record" if it hasn't happened yet?

Arguments are going to be heard on the 1/6/23? That would be unusual since it is a Friday.

That is the day they take the case or not. It takes four justices. I think they will hear it. If they don't they better have a good reason not to.

 

[Toro]

This shit is still going on?

LOL

Cults gonna cult, and rubes gonna rube!

 

[Lastamender]

This shit is still going on?

LOL

Cults gonna cult, and rubes gonna rube!

You are shit, and you are still here.

 

[dblack]

It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.

Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Tim Canova While there has been much public attention on the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[Toro]

You are shit, and you are still here.

Keep clinging, Lastdeadender.

LOL

 

[candycorn]

That is the day they take the case or not. It takes four justices. I think they will hear it. If they don't they better have a good reason not to.

Or what?

 

[Likkmee]

It's about damn time. The media is completely silent on this. It's time to put the real winner of the 2020 election back into the White House.

Tim Canova: Supreme Court Considers Case Seeking to Overturn 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft

Guest post by Tim Canova While there has been much public attention on the U.S.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Hillary is dressed ?

 

[Skylar]

Open and shut case. Those members of Congress violated their oath of office.

Open and shut case....says who?

That would be you, citing yourself. And didn't you say the same thing about the election denier suit that Texas levied to the Supreme Court in 2020.....which was dismissed a day later?

 

[Lastamender]

Open and shut case....says who?

That would be you, citing yourself. And didn't you say the same thing about the election denier suit that Texas levied to the Supreme Court in 2020.....which was dismissed a day later?

That case was dismissed because that case would have overturned the election. The SCOTUS was intimidated by the Deep State or whatever you want to call the the criminals running this country.

 

[Skylar]

That case was dismissed because that case would have overturned the election. The SCOTUS was intimidated by the Deep State or whatever you want to call the the criminals running this country.

Again, says you......citing your imagination.You simply have no idea what you're talking about. Your predictions of 'Big Lie' legal outcomes has been one of perfect failure. You've literally never been right on how one of your 'Big Lie' cases is going to turn out.

You're making up pseudo-legal fan fiction, imagining motivations, imagining outcomes, imagining legal remedies for which no constitutional provision exist.

Back in reality, Brunson v. Adams hasn't even managed a writ of certiorari.

 

[Lastamender]

Again, says you......citing your imagination.You simply have no idea what you're talking about. Your predictions of 'Big Lie' legal outcomes has been one of perfect failure. You've literally never been right on how one of your 'Big Lie' cases is going to turn out.

You're making up pseudo-legal fan fiction, imagining motivations, imagining outcomes, imagining legal remedies for which no constitutional provision exist.

Back in reality, Brunson v. Adams hasn't even managed a writ of certiorari.

You back the big lie. The fraud in 2020 was obvious.

 

[Skylar]

You back the big lie. The fraud in 2020 was obvious.

I back the actual election outcome. You back your fantasy. Its been years....and your ilk are still begging for 'investigations' to help them find the evidence that they don't have.

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about. You have never once managed an accurate predictions of legal outcomes in your delusional Big Lie. Every time you've told us how a case was going to turn out, you've been wrong.

But this time is different, huh?

Can we point and laugh at you if this case predictably fails to gain a writ?

 

[bodecea]

Open and shut case. Those members of Congress violated their oath of office.

And what three would that be, sweetie?

 

[Lastamender]

And what three would that be, sweetie?

388 voted not to investigate the election. 147 patriots voted to investigate. Those 388 took the side of alleged fraud over defending the Constitution. FACT.

 

[Skylar]

388 voted not to investigate the election. 147 patriots voted to investigate. Those 388 took the side of alleged fraud over defending the Constitution. FACT.

What fraud? Your ilk wouldn't be begging for investigations if they had the evidence to back the claim.

You started with the accusation, and have been desperately scrambling to find evidence to back it up ever since.

And failing spectacularly. You've literally never been right on any Big Lie legal prediction you've ever made. Your record of failure....is perfect.