Biden says “No Amendment to the Constitution is absolute”

[bigrebnc1775]

You can’t yell … ‘fire’ in a crowded movie theater and call it freedom of speech.

Sure you can, 'specially if it's on fire.

You should have quoted the whole post that was a quote from jo and I countered what he said

 

[pknopp]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

Are you retarded?

Grow up.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

 

[pknopp]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

 

[Moonglow]

Well, this could get interesting...

Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures

WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn&#821…

nypost.com

View attachment 478215

As long as you have the votes then what he says is true.

 

[pknopp]

Well, this could get interesting...

Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures

WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn&#821…

nypost.com

View attachment 478215

As long as you have the votes then what he says is true.

The courts can over rule votes.

 

[Moonglow]

Well, this could get interesting...

Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures

WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn&#821…

nypost.com

View attachment 478215

As long as you have the votes then what he says is true.

The courts can over rule votes.

To a degree yes.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

again liable is not protected under the first amendment.
You can't lie to harm another person

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Well, this could get interesting...

Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures

WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn&#821…

nypost.com

View attachment 478215

As long as you have the votes then what he says is true.

no he's wrong

 

[pknopp]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

again liable is not protected under the first amendment.
You can't lie to harm another person

Because a ruling has been made which meant the Amendment wasn't absolute.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

again liable is not protected under the first amendment.
You can't lie to harm another person

Because a ruling has been made which meant the Amendment wasn't absolute.

the ruling was made that liable to harm another person was not protected

 

[pknopp]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

again liable is not protected under the first amendment.
You can't lie to harm another person

Because a ruling has been made which meant the Amendment wasn't absolute.

the ruling was made that liable to harm another person was not protected

That's what I said.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

What a bright future to look forward too...

*****SARCASTIC SMILE*****

 

[InspectorDetector]

Well, this could get interesting...

Biden declares, ‘No amendment to Constitution is absolute’ as he rolls out gun measures

WASHINGTON — President Biden on Thursday announced a slew of new gun control measures after a recent pair of high-profile mass shootings, and insisted the Second Amendment doesn&#821…

nypost.com

View attachment 478215

Dementia Joe Biden is a fucking idiot.........

 

[justinacolmena]

Biden says “No Amendment to the Constitution is absolute”

If no Amendment to the Constitution is absolute, then why is every jot and tittle of 20th-21st century federal laws and regulations so absolute?

 

[Rigby5]

No right is absolute because all rights are a balance between individual freedom and any conflict you might cause in the rights of others.

But that is irrelevant when it comes to the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights is a bad name for it because it contains no rights at all.
It instead only contains restrictions on the federal government.
And restrictions on the federal government most certainly can be absolute.
When the second amendment says there can be no federal infringement on the right to bear arms, then that can and is absolute.
Meaning that only state and local laws can restrict weapons, not any federal legislation.

 

[justinacolmena]

When the second amendment says there can be no federal infringement on the right to bear arms, then that can and is absolute.
Meaning that only state and local laws can restrict weapons, not any federal legislation.

The Second Amendment is absolute: "shall not be infringed" leaves no room for interpretation or weakening.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

No they are not. You can have them all removed through due process and there have been many cases where one conflicts with another and a court has to make a determination.

One of the biggest we have battled with for years is the conflict to the right to life and the right to privacy.

they are absolute until you do the amendment process

Freedom of the Press.

Fort Bend newspaper loses $1 million libel lawsuit

That Freedom is not absolute.

liable is not a protected form of free speech

I didn't mention speech but the 1st Amendment makes no distinction so that ruling meant the right wasn't absolute.

again liable is not protected under the first amendment.
You can't lie to harm another person

Because a ruling has been made which meant the Amendment wasn't absolute.

the ruling was made that liable to harm another person was not protected

That's what I said.

lying not being protected doesn't mean the first amendment is not absolute.

 

[Smokin' OP]

While true its a pretty vague general statement. While no Amendment is absolute there is very little he can do on his own. Maybe nothing.

all amendments are protected rights therefore they are absolute

Who told you that?

The government (politicians) wrote the contents of the constitution, they can change them, with enough support, anytime they wish.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

No right is absolute because all rights are a balance between individual freedom and any conflict you might cause in the rights of others.

But that is irrelevant when it comes to the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights is a bad name for it because it contains no rights at all.
It instead only contains restrictions on the federal government.
And restrictions on the federal government most certainly can be absolute.
When the second amendment says there can be no federal infringement on the right to bear arms, then that can and is absolute.
Meaning that only state and local laws can restrict weapons, not any federal legislation.

The second amendment is cut and dry and to the point
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.