RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
Well, Mr Avoid the question, did you complain about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries?
AOC Proposes Cutting US Aid to Israel
- Thread starter georgephillip
- Start date
Well, Mr Avoid the question, did you complain about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries?
TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 102,304
- 66,084
- 2,605
Omg you idiot
That wasnt partisan reasons. Apples and iphones
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
So, Israel fought for their land where it currently is? Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
So Trump & Muhammad are like twins.Nothing will happen to Israel no matter what you scheme. Their very existence is proof of God's existence and promises made to them.If the US were to terminate all military aid to Israel and also refrain from providing diplomatic cover at the UN, I believe the Israeli economy would begin to crater, especially if BDS were to ramp up world wide as a consequence.
Maybe you’re right, maybe you’re wrong. It seems to me that we’re getting a bargain for what we spend for, but let’s say you’re right for arguments sake. If we stopped aid to Israel what do you think is going to magically change?
Impact
Israel will continue to prosper, the desert will bloom, and any Arab coalition of Nations stupid enough to try to destroy Israel will be utterly decimated.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.
The Ottoman Empire gave it to the Allies.
The Allies gave a portion to Israel.
The Arabs kept losing wars, and more territory, to Israel.
Does that clear up your confusion?
Natural Citizen
American Made
- Aug 8, 2016
- 31,147
- 32,332
- 2,945
I'm tired of the government stealing my wealth an giving to any country. Especially Israel.
Shit like that it why sixtys fan has an Israeli troll thread he and a couple others occupy daily. Who's paying for that program? Ahem.
Shit like that it why sixtys fan has an Israeli troll thread he and a couple others occupy daily. Who's paying for that program? Ahem.
RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,568
- 290
How did the Ottoman Empire get it?
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
They must have invaded.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 59,513
- 18,037
- 2,250
The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.
georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #190
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
I'm not interested in a history lesson.
I merely show you where this is going.
As to "international law"... don't hold your breath on that one, Abdul.
When you get the Chinese to give back Tibet, or when you get the Russians to give back Crimea, maybe the Israelis will consider alternatives.
By then, however, the 1922 map will have long-since become a fait accompli.
The 1947-1948 map - and Right of Return - are as dead as Julius Caesar.
You had a chance at serious talks right up to 1967... or 1973 at the latest... and you pi$$ed away the opportunity, as usual.
"The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity."
The 1922 map will ultimately control; hell, they're most of the way there already.
The next round has already begun... Jerusalem-as-capital, and now the Golan.
Vae victus.
Enjoy.
--------------
Perhaps this thread is more suitable for the Israel-Palestine chat-room.
Last edited:
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 59,513
- 18,037
- 2,250
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #193
Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
They've been beating Arab ass for decades.Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #195
They've been beating Arab ass for decades.Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
Now you know why.
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
They've been beating Arab ass for decades.Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
Now you know why.
Because Arabs are really weak fighters.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 59,513
- 18,037
- 2,250
They've been beating Arab ass for decades.Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
Now you know why.
The US Government didn't start military aid until the 1973 war.
BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 59,513
- 18,037
- 2,250
They've been beating Arab ass for decades.Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.
"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."
United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia
It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.
King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia
"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.
"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]
"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]
"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.
"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."
Now you know why.
Because Arabs are really weak fighters.
Nah it really came down to a war of attrition. Without Uncle Sam they would have either lost in 1973 or would have used one of the nuclear weapons they had.
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 48,601
- 31,432
- 2,615
There's no such creature as a Palestinian. What nationality was Yassir Arafat?
georgephillip
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #200
A regime of Jewish supremacy from the River to the sea is apartheid.
Palestinian community in Lydda calls for international protection from Israeli state-sanctioned pogroms | MR Online
"In April, Human Rights Watch (HRW) concluded in an extensive legal analysis that the entire Palestinian people is living under one system of Israeli apartheid.
"HRW has thus joined many Palestinian human rights organizations and advocates who have been exposing this apartheid reality for decades.
"Israel’s leading human rights organization, B’Tselem, had reached a similar conclusion earlier this year in a report titled: A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid."
Palestinian community in Lydda calls for international protection from Israeli state-sanctioned pogroms | MR Online
"In April, Human Rights Watch (HRW) concluded in an extensive legal analysis that the entire Palestinian people is living under one system of Israeli apartheid.
"HRW has thus joined many Palestinian human rights organizations and advocates who have been exposing this apartheid reality for decades.
"Israel’s leading human rights organization, B’Tselem, had reached a similar conclusion earlier this year in a report titled: A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid."
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Abortion in the USA has risen since Roe was overturned- Started by Dragonlady
- Replies: 0
-
-
France & Other European Countries Reconsider Air Conditioning- Started by Independent thinker
- Replies: 4
