AOC Proposes Cutting US Aid to Israel

[RealDave]

I would rather cut all aid. But cutting aid for partisan reasons is bullshit.

so you bitched about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries? Trump evens cuts aid to Democrat states like the California fires & Puerto Rico,.

So unless you are bitching also about Trump, shut the fuck up.

I am all for cutting aid but not partisan reasons. Maybe you are too dumb to understand what that means.

Well, Mr Avoid the question, did you complain about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries?

 

[TNHarley]

I would rather cut all aid. But cutting aid for partisan reasons is bullshit.

so you bitched about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries? Trump evens cuts aid to Democrat states like the California fires & Puerto Rico,.

So unless you are bitching also about Trump, shut the fuck up.

I am all for cutting aid but not partisan reasons. Maybe you are too dumb to understand what that means.

Well, Mr Avoid the question, did you complain about Trump cutting aid to those Central America countries?

Omg you idiot
That wasnt partisan reasons. Apples and iphones

 

[RealDave]

Huh ? Only you evangelicals, Zionists that have that version of history in the whole entire world.
You want the Zionists 5o prevail, so the messiah can come back and then slaughter the non Christian's (Jews included) you dont give a rat's ass about the Jews.
The Jews fled Christian lands numerous times to seek refuge amongst Muslim...if they didnt teach you that I am happy to educate you.

Only you evangelicals, Zionists that have that version of history in the whole entire world.

Muslims didn't invade any other nation in all of history?

We did.
Let's check south of Europe, we occupied it for more than 800 years, we built cities, hospitals, water system, unervisities, locals kept their churches and synagogues, paid less taxes and also less abuse that they subjected to under the church and the nobles. Were brought out from the dark ages. Muslims left and the nice Christian's started slaughtering non Christians.

We did.

Thanks for admitting your lie.

Muslims left

Left? Why?

Dynasties come and go.

Sounds like the "Palestinian" dynasty in Israel is over.
They should leave. I hear Syria has room.

So, Israel fought for their land where it currently is? Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

 

[RealDave]

Cut all aid then. In a way it would be a blessing for Israel. Let them exercise complete sovereignty over their own nation. Israel will survive...as usual.

The money could have been put to much better uses.

Maybe you’re right, maybe you’re wrong. It seems to me that we’re getting a bargain for what we spend for, but let’s say you’re right for arguments sake. If we stopped aid to Israel what do you think is going to magically change?

If the US were to terminate all military aid to Israel and also refrain from providing diplomatic cover at the UN, I believe the Israeli economy would begin to crater, especially if BDS were to ramp up world wide as a consequence.

Impact

Nothing will happen to Israel no matter what you scheme. Their very existence is proof of God's existence and promises made to them.
Israel will continue to prosper, the desert will bloom, and any Arab coalition of Nations stupid enough to try to destroy Israel will be utterly decimated.

So Trump & Muhammad are like twins.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Only you evangelicals, Zionists that have that version of history in the whole entire world.

Muslims didn't invade any other nation in all of history?

We did.
Let's check south of Europe, we occupied it for more than 800 years, we built cities, hospitals, water system, unervisities, locals kept their churches and synagogues, paid less taxes and also less abuse that they subjected to under the church and the nobles. Were brought out from the dark ages. Muslims left and the nice Christian's started slaughtering non Christians.

We did.

Thanks for admitting your lie.

Muslims left

Left? Why?

Dynasties come and go.

Sounds like the "Palestinian" dynasty in Israel is over.
They should leave. I hear Syria has room.

So, Israel fought for their land where it currently is? Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

The Ottoman Empire gave it to the Allies.
The Allies gave a portion to Israel.
The Arabs kept losing wars, and more territory, to Israel.

Does that clear up your confusion?

 

[Natural Citizen]

I'm tired of the government stealing my wealth an giving to any country. Especially Israel.

Shit like that it why sixtys fan has an Israeli troll thread he and a couple others occupy daily. Who's paying for that program? Ahem.

 

[RealDave]

We did.
Let's check south of Europe, we occupied it for more than 800 years, we built cities, hospitals, water system, unervisities, locals kept their churches and synagogues, paid less taxes and also less abuse that they subjected to under the church and the nobles. Were brought out from the dark ages. Muslims left and the nice Christian's started slaughtering non Christians.

We did.

Thanks for admitting your lie.

Muslims left

Left? Why?

Dynasties come and go.

Sounds like the "Palestinian" dynasty in Israel is over.
They should leave. I hear Syria has room.

So, Israel fought for their land where it currently is? Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

The Ottoman Empire gave it to the Allies.
The Allies gave a portion to Israel.
The Arabs kept losing wars, and more territory, to Israel.

Does that clear up your confusion?

How did the Ottoman Empire get it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

We did.

Thanks for admitting your lie.

Muslims left

Left? Why?

Dynasties come and go.

Sounds like the "Palestinian" dynasty in Israel is over.
They should leave. I hear Syria has room.

So, Israel fought for their land where it currently is? Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

Or did someone take it from someone else & gave it to Israel.

The Ottoman Empire gave it to the Allies.
The Allies gave a portion to Israel.
The Arabs kept losing wars, and more territory, to Israel.

Does that clear up your confusion?

How did the Ottoman Empire get it?

They must have invaded.

 

[BlindBoo]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

 

[georgephillip]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

 

[Kondor3]

]arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny." United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

I'm not interested in a history lesson.

I merely show you where this is going.

As to "international law"... don't hold your breath on that one, Abdul.

When you get the Chinese to give back Tibet, or when you get the Russians to give back Crimea, maybe the Israelis will consider alternatives.

By then, however, the 1922 map will have long-since become a fait accompli.

The 1947-1948 map - and Right of Return - are as dead as Julius Caesar.

You had a chance at serious talks right up to 1967... or 1973 at the latest... and you pi$$ed away the opportunity, as usual.

"The Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity."

The 1922 map will ultimately control; hell, they're most of the way there already.

The next round has already begun... Jerusalem-as-capital, and now the Golan.

Vae victus.

Enjoy.

--------------

Perhaps this thread is more suitable for the Israel-Palestine chat-room.

 

[BlindBoo]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

 

[georgephillip]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

 

[georgephillip]

Consider it payback for the hundreds of thousands of Jews expelled from Muslim-Arab countries in the 1948-1976 time frame.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

Now you know why.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

Now you know why.

Because Arabs are really weak fighters.

 

[BlindBoo]

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan.

The fighting and the Diaspora began soon after the non-binding General Assembly vote on the Parson Plan in 1947 as the Jewish Militia began clearing the Green Zone. Furthermore, several Arab countries sent in unofficial troops to help keep the future Israelis from conquering the entire state of Palestine. They probably would have as the natives had no nation or national defense plan

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

Now you know why.

The US Government didn't start military aid until the 1973 war.

 

[BlindBoo]

"The Plan was accepted by the Jewish Agency for Palestine, despite its perceived limitations.[5][6]Arab leaders and governments rejected it[7] and indicated an unwillingness to accept any form of territorial division,[8] arguing that it violated the principles of national self-determination in the UN Charter which granted people the right to decide their own destiny."

United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine - Wikipedia

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

Woodrow Wilson's King-Crane Commission recognized the Zionist plan to turn Palestine into a Jewish majority state would never happen without military force. The early Zionists admitted as much in their writings of a hundred years ago.

King–Crane Commission - Wikipedia

"Although the commission was sympathetic toward Zionism,[15] it opposed the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine because it conflicted with the Balfour Declaration in respect of the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine.

"The commission found that 'Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine, by various forms of purchase'.[16]

"Nearly 90% of the Palestinian population was emphatically against the entire Zionist program.[16]

"The report noted that there is a principle that the wishes of the local population must be taken into account and that there is widespread anti-Zionist feeling in Palestine and Syria, and the holy nature of the land to Christians and Moslems as well as Jews must preclude solely Jewish dominion.

"It also noted that Jews at that time comprised only 10% of the population of Palestine."

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

It was a non-binding resolution. It had no authority by itself to create any state, much less two. It should have gone back to the Security Council where it should have died. The former World Body, the League of Nations first proposed the Idea. I think it was the Peel Report or Commission that studied the Idea. One of the conclusions as I recall was that the consequence of dividing the land, or the partition, was that they had better be prepared to defend that wall with military force for the foreseeable future, or forever.

They've been beating Arab ass for decades.

Now you know why.

Because Arabs are really weak fighters.

Nah it really came down to a war of attrition. Without Uncle Sam they would have either lost in 1973 or would have used one of the nuclear weapons they had.

 

[BS Filter]

There has never been a Palestine and these Palestinians were killed by their own actions by the Israeli Defense Force.

Non-Jews held legal title to farms, businesses, homes, and bank accounts in PALESTINE prior to 1948 when Jewish terrorists forcibly confiscated those assets.

A 'Catastrophe' That Defines Palestinian Identity

"May 14 marks the 70th anniversary of Israel’s founding; May 15 is a day Palestinians know as their nakba, or 'catastrophe,' the traumatic expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their homes in 1948 by Israelis.

"This event both defined their future of statelessness and occupation, and now forms the basis for their distinct national identity.

"Many of the chief consequences of the nakba, including the displacement of most Palestinians from their ancestral lands and ongoing statelessness, remain unresolved to this day."

Yeah, yeah. I've read the propaganda before. Palestinians came from Jordan after the Israelis settled in Israel. Go peddle your lies elsewhere.

There's no such creature as a Palestinian. What nationality was Yassir Arafat?

 

[georgephillip]

A regime of Jewish supremacy from the River to the sea is apartheid.

Palestinian community in Lydda calls for international protection from Israeli state-sanctioned pogroms | MR Online

"In April, Human Rights Watch (HRW) concluded in an extensive legal analysis that the entire Palestinian people is living under one system of Israeli apartheid.

"HRW has thus joined many Palestinian human rights organizations and advocates who have been exposing this apartheid reality for decades.

"Israel’s leading human rights organization, B’Tselem, had reached a similar conclusion earlier this year in a report titled: A regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea: This is apartheid."