Using one religion to attack another, what a novel concept ! Nothing gets past you, or does it.All false religions= Babylon the great. The harlot of revelation. Satan does it like this-2Cor 11:12-15
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Using one religion to attack another, what a novel concept ! Nothing gets past you, or does it.All false religions= Babylon the great. The harlot of revelation. Satan does it like this-2Cor 11:12-15
Gods chosen are his witnesses-spiritual Israel are now Gods chosen, not literal Israel.
All false religions= Babylon the great. The harlot of revelation. Satan does it like this-2Cor 11:12-15
I believe Rome is the whore of Babylon, specifically Nero.Israel is the whore of Babylon .. don't change scripture. Throughout the Old Testament Israel is scolded for playing the harlot and whoring after false gods.
You would be wrong.I believe Rome is the whore of Babylon, specifically Nero.
maybeYou would be wrong.
Israel's unfaithfulness to God is one of the major threads running through the Old and New Testaments. If you're not clear on this, then you really don't know the Bible.maybe
At the time Revelation was written, it was Rome that was the problem, not IsraelIsrael's unfaithfulness to God is one of the major threads running through the Old and New Testaments. If you're not clear on this, then you really don't know the Bible.
Where in the New Testament is Rome the antagonist?At the time Revelation was written, it was Rome that was the problem, not Israel
I believe Rome is the whore of Babylon, specifically Nero.
Explicitly saying pagan Rome was an abomination would not have been diplomatic at a time Christianity was working to be accepted in the Roman world.Where in the New Testament is Rome the antagonist?
Explicitly saying pagan Rome was an abomination would not have been diplomatic at a time Christianity was working to be accepted in the Roman world.
Bible scholars have various theories concerning what the whore represents. In ancient times, Tertullian suggested that Babylon was a stand-in for pagan Rome.[2] Like Babylon of Revelation, Rome ruled over the kings of the earth,[3] sat on seven mountains,[4] was the center of the world's merchandise,[5] corrupted nations,[6] and was a persecutor of saints.[7] If Babylon does represent Rome, it follows that the beast represents Emperor Nero and that the whore represents the Jews, who John accuses of collaborating with the Roman authorities against Christians.[8]Nope. Rome wasn't the whore of Babylon until Martin Luther fell out with the Vatican.
maybe
Bible scholars have various theories concerning what the whore represents. In ancient times, Tertullian suggested that Babylon was a stand-in for pagan Rome.[2] Like Babylon of Revelation, Rome ruled over the kings of the earth,[3] sat on seven mountains,[4] was the center of the world's merchandise,[5] corrupted nations,[6] and was a persecutor of saints.[7] If Babylon does represent Rome, it follows that the beast represents Emperor Nero and that the whore represents the Jews, who John accuses of collaborating with the Roman authorities against Christians.[8]
Some of them, yes.In the OT-- The tetragrammoton appeared in Hebrew scripture nearly 7000 x. This was the 4 constenants of Gods personal name--YHWH--( Jehovah)- After God inspired his writers to put his name in those places, wicked men with no right to do so, removed it and replaced it with-GOD or LORD( all capitols)-- Which caused much confusion on earth. God put his name there because he wants it there. The wicked keep it out and condemn to the core the bible translators who put it back--figure that one out. Their scholars know 100% it belongs there. It altered ones reading.
Trinity translation-Greek lexicon.-- At John 1:1 in the second line-The Logos was with HO Theos, ( 3rd) and the Logos was Theos.-- The true living God called-Ho Theos in the NT. Jesus( Logos) was not called HO Theos in the last line--just plain Theos--he was not being called The God. a god( small g) is 100% correct.--Other translations in history did not call Jesus God capitol G in their translations, but trinity scholars reject those translations because it exposes them as blind guides.
God worship history undeniable Facts= From Moses on up until this very day--The Israelite religion-teach, serve and worship-YHWH(Jehovah) a single being God. The same God that was taught to Jesus and every bible writer while they attended those places of worship.
A man called-Terrillion was considering God being a trinity in the 2nd century while the true God -a single being God was being served by all claiming to follow Jesus.
Then the religion that came out of Rome held councils, At the first council of Nicea-NO trinity was being taught. It was added at another council. In their own encyclopedia it states--The assimilation of a trinity in a christians life happened near the end of the 4th century.
The religion that came out of Rome--Would not let anyone but upper clergy read the written word of God until about the 1500,s. It was kept in latin until then. Once men were allowed to read Gods written word, they clearly saw something wrong in that religion, for centuries have been trying to make corrections to the errors allowed in but failed because the translations were altered, now we have 34,000 different trinity based religions= a mass of confusion. Gods word clearly teaches--Unity of thought-no division.( 1Cor 1:10)= a single religion on earth has the real Jesus.
Do you know these facts?
Can't find any pertinent passages, eh.Explicitly saying pagan Rome was an abomination would not have been diplomatic at a time Christianity was working to be accepted in the Roman world.
The tribulation was over by the time of Domitian's reign.Nero is the beast.. or later Domitian.
The tribulation was over by the time of Domitian's reign.
Rome was one of the beasts, not the antagonistic one from the point of view of the New Testament.