Alter2Ego
VIP Member
- Thread starter
- #241
ding:
It's not my problem that you can't cope with being debunked. None of your cherry-picked verses support Christendom's 3-in-1 god.
Alter2Ego
ding:I'm happy with the record. Your opinion is shared with a tiny number of people. Mine is shared by billions.
I informed you where the word godhead came from and that it showed up in an English translation over 1,500 years after the Bible was written by God's inspiration. That's not my opinion. That's a fact that you're running from. Below is a quotation and weblinks from sources explaining how "godhede" became "godhead" and ended up in the Bible centuries after it was written.
"The ending "-head", is not connected with the word "head". John Wycliffe introduced the term godhed into English Bible versions in two places, and, though somewhat archaic, the term survives in modern English because of its use in three places of the Tyndale New Testament (1525) and into the Authorized King James Version of the Bible (1611). In that translation, the word was used to translate three different Greek words:
"John Wycliffe introduced the term godhede into English Bible versions in two places, and, though somewhat archaic, the term survives in modern English because of its use in three places of the Tyndale New Testament(1525), the Geneva Bible(1560/1599), and King James Version(1611). In that translation, the word was used to translate three different Koine Greek words:
I also gave you a webilink showing that 1 John 5:7 is a fabrication that seens to appear only in the King James Version--a notoriously trinitarian Bible translation. Other Bibles (which are also trinitarian translations) avoid using the fabricated text. In addition, I asked you pointed questions that you dodged. Those are not opinions, those are facts.
Alter2Ego
Last edited: