A scam and a disgrace

[postman]

I did not know Trump and Alan are the same person.

Hint. Trump cooked the books, and Alan was the chef.

 

[konradv]

There should never be any grand juries.
They are highly disreputable, since the law is not represented by a judge and the defendant is not allowed to challenge lies.
The only reason grand juries are used is so that the prosecutor is protected from lawsuits for his misconduct.

The origin of grand juries was good, in that anyone could then charge anyone else, if they got enough people to petition for a grand jury of the people.
Current grand juries are entirely from the corrupt prosecutors and not the people, so they are an abuse of precedent.

Itrelevant, since grand juries are legal at the present time in the states in question.

 

[martybegan]

Banks rely on corporate financial statements. They don't often get some sort of independent audit, which again would be based on the companies books, which Trump routinely forged.
Their valuation matched Trumps because they were working off the same set of forged books.
Why do you think Alan Weisenberg went to jail?

Those books and audits are done by independent companies.

 

[Rawley]

Why would we? That’s your job.

LOL Whooosh

 

[postman]

That’s an ad from a lender.

Seven factors that determine your mortgage interest rate | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Understand the key factors that affect your interest rate. Use our Explore Rates Tool to see how they may affect interest rates for loans in your area.

www.consumerfinance.gov

That's from a government agency. The consumer financial protection bureau.

About us
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 21st century agency that implements and enforces Federal consumer financial law and ensures that markets for consumer financial products are fair, transparent, and competitive.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Interesting. So if Trump "incited an insurrection" then why isn't he being charged with doing that? Oh my gosh, Richard! You need to call Jack Smith right now! He somehow neglected to do that! (eye roll)

He was charged with that by the House of Representatives and found guilty by 57 senators.

But you knew that, so cut the BULLSHIT moron!

 

[postman]

I love their argument, that if someone did something illegal, they would have been criminally charged. Or they would be in jail.

That their not being prosecuted is PROOF of their innocence.

 

[Rigby5]

That does not relieve FPOTUS#45 and the Trump Organization from fraudulant and illegal activities as part of their business practices.

WW

View attachment 854637

Wrong.
An evaluation the bank is not allowed to use, can not at all even be remotely "deceptive".
It is utterly and completely impossible for the loan applicant to defraud a bank.

 

[Rawley]

To bad I'm not a lib, I was a loyal GOP voter until Trump rode down the elevator.

But go right ahead with TDS (Trump Devotion Syndrome).

WW

Sure. And I was a Solid Gold Dancer

 

[Rigby5]

He was charged with that by the House of Representatives and found guilty by 57 senators.

But you knew that, so cut the BULLSHIT moron!

Wrong.
The House of Representatives decide if there is probable cause to charge only.
It does NOT at all determine guilt.
That is for the Senate to decide.

 

[Rawley]

He was charged with that by the House of Representatives and found guilty by 57 senators.

But you knew that, so cut the BULLSHIT moron!

LOL Acquitted after trial, but you knew that.

 

[OldFlame]

Nope, what it is is a crook that was a crook for decades and bought off a corrupt system with daddy's money...

Well the crook is getting his comeuppance.

WW

That describes every politician in fucking DC.

So you're willing to corrupt the system and allow your politicians to abuse and corrupt the system to make sure that happens? Zero integrity, and it will come back on you, 100%.

 

[Rigby5]

The point of the prosecution is that he didn’t earn the money/assets.

First of all, from what I have heard, he does know real estate well and does buy and resell or rent for a very good profit.
But whether or not he earned any profits is not up to the prosecution to decide.
The prosecution is criminal.

 

[postman]

Wrong.
An evaluation the bank is not allowed to use, can not at all even be remotely "deceptive".
It is utterly and completely impossible for the loan applicant to defraud a bank.

In an affidavit provided to a Caribbean court before his arrest, Bankman-Fried said he and FTX co-founder Gary Wang together borrowed over $546 million from Alameda via promissory notes in April and May.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Wrong.
An evaluation the bank is not allowed to use, can not at all even be remotely "deceptive".
It is utterly and completely impossible for the loan applicant to defraud a bank.

Nope, not wrong.

FPOTUS#45 has already been found liable for persistent fraudulent business practices.

WW

 

[Rigby5]

Itrelevant, since grand juries are legal at the present time in the states in question.

But the point is even one grand jury is suspicious and should be monitored by regulatory agencies, and that 91 grand jury indictments is way over the top, and clearly illegal.

 

[kyzr]

You mean like Aberdeen Scotland? Mar A Lago?
Actually they are owned by the Trump Organization based in New York. So even though those properties are outside the physical state when they will be handled by the New York 3rd party that will be responsible for liquidation to pay the disengorgement.
Oh - And the Trump Organization has been under court ordered Monitoring for the last year, so he can't dispose of the properties to evade the disengorgement. WW

Celebrating the theft of the multi-$billion Trump Organization?
Because of a misinterpretation of a property value on a form?
When no one was defrauded.
You really think that this "case" will stand up on appeal? This is Banana Republic-101.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/11/06/turley_this_is_a_case_uniquely_created_for_trump_this_crosses_the_line_from_law_to_entertainment.html

Letitia James is going for ‘total annihilation’: Jonathan Turley | Fox News Video

FOX News contributor Jonathan Turley reacts to former President Donald Trump testifying in the New York civil fraud case, calling Attorney General Letitia James’ efforts to sue him ‘disturbing.’

www.foxnews.com

 

[WorldWatcher]

Sure. And I was a Solid Gold Dancer

Cool, sounds like you did something productive with your Saturday nights.

WW

 

[Rigby5]

Nope, not wrong.

FPOTUS#45 has already been found liable for persistent fraudulent business practices.

WW

Found guilty by a judge who clearly is deliberately in violation of the law.
The law is clear, and there is no possible prosecutable offense when applying for a loan.
Especially since it was paid back and there is no victim.

In an affidavit provided to a Caribbean court before his arrest, Bankman-Fried said he and FTX co-founder Gary Wang together borrowed over $546 million from Alameda via promissory notes in April and May.

And what is your point?
A Caribbean court is not a US bank and is not under SEC regulations.
But were they arrested for defrauding on the loan, or was it investors that they defrauded?

 

[Care4all]

I did not know Trump and Alan are the same person.

Tied together like Siamese twins.