berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 35,936
- 29,213
- 2,820
That, my friend, is the definition of a deflection.You would believe anything that the NYTimes printed. Afterall,they are never wrong, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That, my friend, is the definition of a deflection.You would believe anything that the NYTimes printed. Afterall,they are never wrong, right?
Stating a fact, Berg.That, my friend, is the definition of a deflection.

Their investigation of detailed decades of financial transfers and schemes revealed he inherited "at least" $413M (not $450M, my bad, he inherited at least $413 million equivalent to at least $450 million in today's dollars, adjusted for inflation)). As always you are free to believe what you want.......facts be damned.Fuzzy math by the NYT got it to 450 million.![]()
Nowhere in your post did you state a fact.Stating a fact, Berg.
Damn actual facts when you can spin a yarn.![]()
Might want to use other sources. Oter sources say it wasn't 450 million.Their investigation of detailed decades of financial transfers and schemes revealed he inherited "at least" $413M. As always you are free to believe what you want.......facts be damned.
Meister, do yourself a favor and go to Google and write there what you say to me and my answers to you (do it exactly as they are written), and ask Google who is the biased one. You will be surprised at Google's answers given that those answers will not be coming from me but coming from an unbiased source!Fake news, son.
Your limited sources are so biased to the left. You're brain washed at best.
Meister, do yourself a favor and go to Google and write there what you say to me and my answers to you (do it exactly as they are written), and ask Google who is the biased one. You will be surprised at Google's answers given that those answers will not be coming from me but coming from an unbiased source!
FYI, I am going to stop saying all these negatives about you, given that you are simply ignoring them and not even trying to understand that I am NOT TRYING to debase you, but simply trying to make you look at yourself. Evidently what I am saying is not working because you are not open to looking inside yourself.
It is pitiful, but it is what it is.
and by the way and with you saying "son" to me. Are you older than 100 years? I am 80, so if you call me son, you must be over 100 years old!
Meister, do yourself a favor and go to Google and write there what you say to me and my answers to you (do it exactly as they are written), and ask Google who is the biased one. You will be surprised at Google's answers given that those answers will not be coming from me but coming from an unbiased source!
FYI, I am going to stop saying all these negatives about you, given that you are simply ignoring them and not even trying to understand that I am NOT TRYING to debase you, but simply trying to make you look at yourself. Evidently what I am saying is not working because you are not open to looking inside yourself.
It is pitiful, but it is what it is.
and by the way and with you saying "son" to me. Are you older than 100 years? I am 80, so if you call me son, you must be over 100 years old!
68% is not all that biased. Can you come up with a better research outlet that is less biased?
Like
Dislike
Does Google Lean Left?
Yes — multiple analyses show that Google Search and Google News tend to feature a higher proportion of left-leaning outlets compared to other major search engines.
Empirical evidence
A 2024 AllSides analysis of Google Search results found that 68% of the news sources featured for select search terms were rated “Lean Left” by AllSides, compared to 4% “Left,” 16% “Center,” 11% “Lean Right,” and 9% “Right” AllSides. The top 10 featured outlets in the study included The New York Times, CNN, The Guardian, ABC News, NBC News, Washington Post, Politico, Associated Press, and NPR — all rated Lean Left — with only Fox News (Right) in the mix AllSides. This pattern was consistent with AllSides’ own Google News bias rating.
Have a good day, you're hopeless.68% is not all that biased. Can you come up with a better research outlet that is less biased?
Simply speaking, prove your statements and use a totally unbiased source.
The key to all of this is called "doing research to gain knowledge". where has your knowledge come from and is it from a totally unbiased source?
Having some knowledge is better than not having any! Do you agree?
As far as your posts are concerned, it seems that your source of knowledge is Trump! Am I wrong?
Prove where your information/knowledge comes from!!!!!!!
You criticize but do not offer anything better!

Trump has no trouble destroying his rep.First, your response has nothing to do with my post, secondly the left is obsessed with trying to smear Trump, the nuts have gone so far to claim Trump killed two people in setting up his fake assassination attempts. The stupidity is mind numbing. I do find all the fake outrage to be amusing, however the right’s outrages over Democrats are amusing as well.
How did all that lawfare workout. Trump kicked your assWe are talking a multi times felon, an impeached President (2), and won who has been liable in more than a 1000 civil cases.
Not a good luck on him, Meister.
I love him like you love Bill and Hillary.You are a funny person, and hate DT like Banker/luckyone does.
Not a good look for you either, because you're not stupid.
That was a kangaroo court, and when it goes to the appeals
process, will be thrown out just like the other ones.
Might want to bone up on the lawsuit numbers and their breakdown
of won/loss.
Have a good one JL
And his in return.How did all that lawfare workout. Trump kicked your ass
can't answer can you?Have a good day, you're hopeless.![]()
beyond your ability to respond to a simple and common sense question?Have a good day, you're hopeless.![]()
Hardly.How did all that lawfare workout. Trump kicked your ass
Hardly.
Which far exceeds yours, thanks for the compliment.I see you can cut and paste. Unfortunately, that seems to be the limit of your intellectual skills.