The problem is your hypocrisy. There is no difference between homosexual sex and incest (as described before) by your logic. You're saying this is right because it's right and that is wrong because it's wrong.You did not say an adult son. You said a consenting son, and I am still not OK with it. There are certain lines that should not be crossed in order to maintain our social order. If that were OK, what is not OK?. Sex and marriage should be reserved for consenting adults ( regardless of respective genders) who are not closely related . That is how we maintain a diverse gene pool. In addition, intimacy and marriage create new family structures
And I will add, the point is not well taken. It was a red herring. The discussion is about LGBT children, what they are exposed to and the purpose and value of such events. Do you have anything to contribute to that?
Your reasoning of "social order" is exactly what many who oppose homosexuality say — you don't seem satisfied with their reasoning, but how is it different from yours? It isn't.
Nothing new. It's been said many times. It's sick.