Is Anthropogenic (Human-Caused) Global Warming/AGW Falsifiable?

[Dagosa]

A theory is a hypothesis that has survived attempts to falsify it and has successfully made predictions. That does not mean that new knowledge might not falsify it. Pappadave1 is correct. Many theories have been falsified.

Theories aren’t falsified. No one of them has ever been. Why ? Because science theories are all subject to change and modifications. That’s why they are called THEORIES.

 

[Dagosa]

Theories are just as prone to falsification as hypotheses. There was once an almost universal "theory' that malaria was caused by "swamp gas miasmas".

Wrong…..hypotheses are untested, unverified statements.

 

[Dagosa]

and according to highly correlated satellite and balloon data, the additional Co2 produced precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere.

Gee, you just admitted the atmosphere gets colder the higher you go. Of course that makes temperature measure pretty fking useless any where except near the surface, dufus.

 

[EMH]

Gee, you just admitted the atmosphere gets colder the higher you go. Of course that makes temperature measure pretty fking useless any where except near the surface, dufus.

It took tens of millions of years of Antarctica's continent specific ice age to get that ice to over 2 miles high. That's what ice cores document.

Earth gets colder the closer one gets to a pole.

One Earth polar circle is 50F colder than the other, and only a tiny part of that is elevation. The real part is 8 million cubic miles of ice.


Google = How cold is it on top of Mount Kilimanjaro?


The temperature at Uhuru Peak, the summit of Kilimanjaro, is always below freezing. It can even drop to -27°C (-17°F) at night! And that's not counting the wind chill.



The lowest temperature ever recorded on Earth was -89.2°C (-128.6°F) at Vostok Station in Antarctica on July 21, 1983


Why is one "two mile high" reading 100F colder than the other???

 

[EMH]

Gee, you just admitted the atmosphere gets colder the higher you go. Of course that makes temperature measure pretty fking useless any where except near the surface, dufus.

Nice try...

satellites and balloons are real data refuting the Co2 FRAUD completely. There is, in fact, NO ACTUAL DATA to support the Co2 FRAUD, just FUDGE.

 

[Dagosa]

A theory is a hypothesis that has survived attempts to falsify it and has successfully made predictions. That does not mean that new knowledge might not falsify it. Pappadave1 is correct. Many theories have been falsified.

Name one and name the science research institution and working scientists that did it.

Nice try...

satellites and balloons are real data refuting the Co2 FRAUD completely. There is, in fact, NO ACTUAL DATA to support the Co2 FRAUD, just FUDGE.

You are so science illiterate you don’t have a fkin* clue what you mean…this why you keep repeating the same babble.

 

[Robert W]

Name one and name the science research institution and working scientists that did it.

You are so science illiterate you don’t have a fkin* clue what you mean…this why you keep repeating the same babble.

In real life, one must believe you whip tots that make you angry.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Many theories have been falsified.

List of superseded scientific theories - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[HikerGuy83]

What does that have to with with AGW PRECISELY.

Does not exist.

 

[ding]

Yes, the geologic record falsifies AGW.

 

[Samofvt]

Theories aren’t falsified. No one of them has ever been. Why ? Because science theories are all subject to change and modifications. That’s why they are called THEORIES.

The Flat Earth Theory? Falsified. Not just modified, falsified. Many men went against the power structures of the time in an attempt to spread the word about their discovery and ended up going to prison or, worse. It took hundreds of years for brave thought leaders to embrace the idea of a round globe, and many brave explorers finally proved it. Does Ferdinand Magellan ring a bell?

Pseudo-science is what you're talking about. It has no place in rational decision-making. As soon as an observation is found which does not support the hypothesis (or theory), One must be forced to reconsider the validity of that theory (or hypothesis).

The only difference between a hypothesis and a theory is the level of acceptance. Theories are more universally accepted.

 

[Dagosa]

The Flat Earth Theory? Falsified. Not just modified, falsified. Many men went against the power structures of the time in an attempt to spread the word about their discovery and ended up going to prison or, worse. It took hundreds of years for brave thought leaders to embrace the idea of a round globe, and many brave explorers finally proved it. Does Ferdinand Magellan ring a bell?

Pseudo-science is what you're talking about. It has no place in rational decision-making. As soon as an observation is found which does not support the hypothesis (or theory), One must be forced to reconsider the validity of that theory (or hypothesis).

The only difference between a hypothesis and a theory is the level of acceptance. Theories are more universally accepted.

There was no flat earth theory……wrong….a hypothesis is just that, a ste ent that has not been tested…..a theory has been thoroughly tested….you’re confused.

 

[Samofvt]

There is very little global warming. It is not caused by CO2.

 

[Dagosa]

There is very little global warming. It is not caused by CO2.

View attachment 1014947

Only the stupid beloved they are smarter than every climate research facility in the entire world, every related corporation and every institute of higher learning in the world. There is no other word to describe deniers, other than stupid.

 

[Dagosa]

The Flat Earth Theory? Falsified. Not just modified, falsified. Many men went against the power structures of the time in an attempt to spread the word about their discovery and ended up going to prison or, worse. It took hundreds of years for brave thought leaders to embrace the idea of a round globe, and many brave explorers finally proved it. Does Ferdinand Magellan ring a bell?

Pseudo-science is what you're talking about. It has no place in rational decision-making. As soon as an observation is found which does not support the hypothesis (or theory), One must be forced to reconsider the validity of that theory (or hypothesis).

The only difference between a hypothesis and a theory is the level of acceptance. Theories are more universally accepted.

Babble.

 

[Samofvt]

Babble.

 

[Dagosa]

More babble.

 

[Pappadave1]

Only the stupid beloved they are smarter than every climate research facility in the entire world, every related corporation and every institute of higher learning in the world. There is no other word to describe deniers, other than stupid.

"Every climate research facility in the entire world" is dependent on government grants for its existence. Therefore, they MUST keep people misinformed in order to keep the money flowing.

 

[Dagosa]

"Every climate research facility in the entire world" is dependent on government grants for its existence. Therefore, they MUST keep people misinformed in order to keep the money flowing.

You have a point ? You mean they are paid to lie foolish ? You mean 30,000 universities and climate research facilities are all lying and YOU HAVE NOT PROVIDED ONE SHREAD OF EVIDENCE.
TRUMP AND YOU MUST BE FKING INCOMPETENT .
Trump was in office. His DOJ did not prosecute one university accepting govt funds and producing false information. Hilarious…..what a lune if bullshit.

Did we pay Russia and China to lie too ?

 

[Dagosa]

"Every climate research facility in the entire world" is dependent on government grants for its existence. Therefore, they MUST keep people misinformed in order to keep the money flowing.

You’re sounding real stupid……