9/11 Firefighters Trash Official 9/11 Story, Say Obvious Demolition, Documentary "Calling Out Bravo 7"

Cellblock2429

We're both stuck on conspiracies CB. You're stuck, 24 years later, on an Official Conspiracy Theory that is contradicted by all facts and the laws of physics. Why do you think so many architects and engineers, people with REAL physics degrees and experience, have called bullshit on your theory? Get back to your cellblock inmate, you're way out of your league.
 
Cellblock2429

We're both stuck on conspiracies CB. You're stuck, 24 years later, on an Official Conspiracy Theory that is contradicted by all facts and the laws of physics. Why do you think so many architects and engineers, people with REAL physics degrees and experience, have called bullshit on your theory? Get back to your cellblock inmate, you're way out of your league.
/-----/ You mean experts like this? But I doubt if you have read any of the info I posted. I'm done with this.
 
Oh, OK. And I guess that means the same fire can blow vertical pieces of the exoskeleton 600 feet laterally. You must be a physics graduate from one of these woke colleges.
your comment makes no sense-----did you pass high school physics? Do you believe that the buildings were struck by planes? Have you ever met a NYC fire fighter?
 
Yeah, from office fires. NIST fools are so common. The American people are so well brainwashed they need no proof for anything the government tells them to think.
your post is incomprehensible. ??? "yeah from office fires" ???? I do not need the government to tell me what to think of the event of 9-11-01-----I witnessed it and its idiot aftermath of insane propaganda up close. I have also witnessed a few events of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION-----
did your high school physics teacher ever tell you anything about implosion?
 
your post is incomprehensible. ??? "yeah from office fires" ???? I do not need the government to tell me what to think of the event of 9-11-01-----I witnessed it and its idiot aftermath of insane propaganda up close. I have also witnessed a few events of CONTROLLED DEMOLITION-----
did your high school physics teacher ever tell you anything about implosion?
You're so ignorant Rosie you don't even know what the NIST report claims.
 
of course I know--the NIST guidelines do not refer to office fires
They are not guidelines silly woman, it is a report that is 20 years old. A report just like the official narrative--completely contradicted by facts and the laws of physics.
 
They are not guidelines silly woman, it is a report that is 20 years old. A report just like the official narrative--completely contradicted by facts and the laws of physics.
to what imaginary law of physics do you refer?
 
Last edited:
They are not guidelines silly woman, it is a report that is 20 years old. A report just like the official narrative--completely contradicted by facts and the laws of physics.
Where are these facts and which specific law of phsyics are you talking about?
 
Cellblock2429

We're both stuck on conspiracies CB. You're stuck, 24 years later, on an Official Conspiracy Theory that is contradicted by all facts and the laws of physics. Why do you think so many architects and engineers, people with REAL physics degrees and experience, have called bullshit on your theory? Get back to your cellblock inmate, you're way out of your league.
It is not contradicted by any such gfacts or laws of physics.

You cannot name any such facts or laws of physics.

So many architects and engineers have not called bullshit. AE911 truth is a collection of frauds POSING as architects and Engineers. That is proven as njone of them were ever vetted or required to show evidence fo expertise.

You are long since defeate and proven a liar
 
Yes it does



It does in fact go into great detail about the fires which were burning in the offices withing WTC.

Which in turn weakened the steel supports which were already overstressed because many of them wre severed on impact.
SO? the term "office fire" conjures up in my mind-----'someone threw a cigarette in the
trash can and we had a little fire' In the case of the WTC----of course OFFICES were on fire.
The STUFF in offices----when it BURNS can achieve a VERY VERY VERY high temperature---not
the paper in the trash can----but all sorts of PLASTIC stuff----computers and other plastic
fixtures-----and that's what created enough heat to weaken the metal supports. Metal fatigue
HAPPENS
 
SO? the term "office fire" conjures up in my mind-----'someone threw a cigarette in the
trash can and we had a little fire' In the case of the WTC----of course OFFICES were on fire.
The STUFF in offices----when it BURNS can achieve a VERY VERY VERY high temperature---not
the paper in the trash can----but all sorts of PLASTIC stuff----computers and other plastic
fixtures-----and that's what created enough heat to weaken the metal supports. Metal fatigue
HAPPENS
An office fire is merely a fire in an office.

That is what they went into detail about
 
15th post
Laws that you are ignorant of, those regarding the collapse of structures.
Soo no answer because you are full of shit

The collapse of the towers and # 7 were all perfectly in keeping with the laws of physics and that is fact you CANNOT dispute
 
Laws that you are ignorant of, those regarding the collapse of structures.
I am "ignorant" of your imaginary laws of collapse? I am fascinated---tell
me all about (to the extent of your extensive knowledge) IMPLOSION
 
Cellblock2429

We're both stuck on conspiracies CB. You're stuck, 24 years later, on an Official Conspiracy Theory that is contradicted by all facts and the laws of physics. Why do you think so many architects and engineers, people with REAL physics degrees and experience, have called bullshit on your theory? Get back to your cellblock inmate, you're way out of your league.
you owned him and took him to school,this paid shill also ignores how witnesses said they heard explosions in the baement BEFORE the plane struck above,these witnesses have NOTHING to gain by lying and they would be risking going to prison by doing so as well.

Yeah, from office fires. NIST fools are so common. The American people are so well brainwashed they need no proof for anything the government tells them to think.

you nailed it. :yes_text12:
 
Bin Laden denied involvement in 9/11 many times.

"I have already said that I am not involved in the September 11 attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. "

"Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. "


:yes_text12:
so much for the ramblings of these paid shills Bin Laden did it,they also ignore how oswald denied he shot the president which contradicts the official version of the warren commission he was trying to make his mark on history,you dont go and DENY you do it if you are seeking fame as the warren commission cliamed,you proudly boast of it,so much for the myth that bin laden and oswald admitted they did it.
 
Back
Top Bottom